Personally I don’t think it should even cost Pesce but sometimes you gotta give. If this is becoming a circus or was one the whole time just get out. We don’t need Karlsson. I’d like us to have a little more Vegas in us but this is a pretty big change for this team.
Fabbro would be a good piece to flip to the Sharks as part of the deal. But I think you would have to make this a three way instead of taking the risk of two separate deals in series and then have the second part fall through.Pagnotta saying they had the press release ready for Tarasenko lends some credence to the thought that the agent was perhaps doing a bit too much for the player and got fired for basically agreeing to a deal prior to getting the player’s buy in.
I bet the holdup with Nashville is that they want to include Fabbro or similar salary coming back and the Canes just want futures to flip for Karlsson or another player.
They are two separate things but one is driving the other.Are the canes really going to be THAT much better adding karlsson and subtracting Pesce+ whatever else they give up? I guess if Pesce leaving is a foregone conclusion they want to maximize the opportunity but if karlsson plays like he did in the last few years instead of this most recent one I’m not sure we are in a better position
Yea, if he comes really cheap or for minor assets, WITH 50% RETENTION? I'm all for it. If it's going to cost us real assets to acquire a player who would be a luxury we really don't need? Hard pass, use those assets on a scoring forward that we've been crying we needed for years. And again, with Orlov as 2LD and Nikishin 2 years away from potentially replacing him, Skjei should be the one to go first.Can I just say, I have mixed feelings about acquiring Karlsson if it requires assets.
Dude won the Norris last year... and was basically considered an unmovable asset 8 months before. 4 years left even at 50% retained is still a risk to take on. A risk I'm willing to take, but if we're also talking about a king's ransom worthy of acquiring a Norris trophy winner... that changes the equation a bit. I'm surprised to see the type of return packages I'm seeing from a "mock trade" perspective. I don't think it should take a good roster player, a 1st, a prospect, a 2nd, etc. I would've hoped this was more of a net neutral cap dump situation. If we need to add in order to get the retention, I get it. But even then, it should probably cost less than or equal to whatever a return for Pesce would look like. Idk. Mixed feelings. All dependent on which Karlsson we get at the end of the day, of course.
So our subtractions:
A 6/7 defenseman who didn't play in the playoffs.
A defensemen on LTIR
A 6th defensemen who was a deadline pickup and didn't add much.
A forward who played 5 games (and left 2 early)
A deadline pickup with bum hips that played little and contributed even less
2 over the hill 4th liners.
IF they were expecting to add Tarasenko anywhere b/t $3-5M per year and Karlsson, they'd still have a heck of a lot of work to do.
W/ TDA added and a 22 man roster (Drury, Ponomarev and Coghlan up, Kochetkov buried), looks like they have them w/ $5.2M in space based on some crude CapFriendly-ing
I’m still curious to know will you guys want to acquire both TDA and Karlsson or just one
I don't think that's right. He's on IR and his cap hit is counted for.Add Svechnikov‘s $7m back in. He’s on LTIR on CapFriendly I think.
hoping just one (TDA) but would not be surprised if we get EK as well. Just seems redundant at this point and TDA comes at less than 1/4 EK's current hit since it's confirmed that the Flyers are retaining 50%. Not to mention the acquisition price is likely only a prospect we weren't signing anyway for TDA.I’m still curious to know will you guys want to acquire both TDA and Karlsson or just one