hockeyes
Registered User
- Jun 15, 2013
- 5,158
- 3,098
What duo is better? Hughson and Simpson or the guys calling the game on SN west/pacific?
The guys on pacific are a million times better.
What duo is better? Hughson and Simpson or the guys calling the game on SN west/pacific?
you mst have short term memory haha I was more embarrassed last year. I was at that zambonie gameWe're tied with a shitty team 48 hours after the most embarassing loss of our lives.
We could be better.
What duo is better? Hughson and Simpson or the guys calling the game on SN west/pacific?
Leafs need to start hitting. create some energy.
The fact they play so soft, is why they look lifeless half the time
Exactly!He's a good Bogo replacement given he can log big PK time
It proves that you don't need to have a heavy shot from the pt.The Canucks generate so much offense from the point compared to us
I guess so. He probably should have played goalie too.When you do both poorly that'll happen
Should be common knowledge he's only been with the club for 5 yearsWas born in Calgary then the USA until 14 until moved to Sweden. He spent summers in Sweden during his childhood as well. Had to google some knew was born Canadian but lived in Sweden.
Bogo isn’t coming back
Guess it's worth a shot.I guess so. He probably should have played goalie too.
Because it's hockey and odd man rushes happen? I think he went on a 3 game stretch where he faced odd man rushes and they all ended up in his net. 1 of which he was the only D on the ice.Odd question nobody seems prepared to answer. If Rielly is the weak link, why is he somehow always the one caught in the 2 on 1s?
Yeah I didn't mean to say Rielly was being useless and just watching. Just the whole PP vibe changed when the puck stopped going through him and it became a 4 on 4 instead. As you can tell I'm just not a fan of him on pp1 running point . I like him otherwiseApologies then, the ones it refers to know who they are.
The Canucks generate so much offense from the point compared to us