I think Treliving is kinda average too, but there's an underlying theme in this thread, and on Twitter, that I'm not understanding.
The theme is that Treliving is who he is while Dubas learned the ropes in Toronto and will now go onto Pittsburgh and have great success.
Hmmmm........not sure about this. Treliving has a little more experience as GM, but they both started in managerial roles at roughly the same time. What evidence is there that Treliving can't change for the better and Dubas can? Dubas's last trade deadline? We still don't know how much of that was Spezza's or Shanny's influence. He was still making some controversial moves as early as last summer (Murray). Whether Dubas makes the right decisions or not, you can argue he's not that "forward thinking" and pretty rigid in many ways. For example, not budging on the core 4 and coach, as well as his Soo obsession. I just don't see enough evidence that Dubas is open-minded and growing while Treliving is just stuck where he is and will not grow. Treliving is a smart man and I haven't heard the term "stubborn" used to describe him. Is this an age thing? Older man can't change his thinking? I'm confused.