Crysis
Registered User
- Jun 28, 2015
- 1,144
- 296
he was good enough to make Team sweden last year. Some people were upset that he wasnt invited to camp.
Ahhh okay. Thought you meant Babcock is an idiot. lol
he was good enough to make Team sweden last year. Some people were upset that he wasnt invited to camp.
Ahhh okay. Thought you meant Babcock is an idiot. lol
nah. It's Amazing how overlooked he is though. You dont Always need size to be a star in this League. Martin St Loius type of player?
nah. It's Amazing how overlooked he is though. You dont Always need size to be a star in this League. Martin St Loius type of player?
St-Louis was an amazing skater with one of the best work ethics in the entire NHL. Heart of a lion and just a great player at both ends of the ice. He also had a great shot.
Timashov plays an entirely different game.
The only thing they have in common is that they are considered undersized for NHL standards.
and yet he was waived by flames.That's a lofty comparison, St. Louis was fearless, played with a serious edge.
I am just saying that plenty of players get passed on in the draft because they dont have size.
I don't disagree there.
I think Timashov falling in the draft is also due to his skating and upper body strength. He's not the fastest guy on the ice and when you're considered undersized, it can be tough to make it as a pro if you can't move fast. His edging and lateral movement though are really good and that makes him a very slippery player, which is why he's able to control the puck incredibly well.
That's why it's never a bad thing to take a chance on these highly skilled players, no matter how big they are. Great value pick and Timashov will have a lot of time to develop over the next 3 to 5 years.
I was wondering if Hemsky may be a good comparison for Timashov, or Tanguay.
I don't disagree there.
I think Timashov falling in the draft is also due to his skating and upper body strength. He's not the fastest guy on the ice and when you're considered undersized, it can be tough to make it as a pro if you can't move fast. His edging and lateral movement though are really good and that makes him a very slippery player, which is why he's able to control the puck incredibly well.
That's why it's never a bad thing to take a chance on these highly skilled players, no matter how big they are. Great value pick and Timashov will have a lot of time to develop over the next 3 to 5 years.
What current or former player would you compare him to?
Wellwood had 83 assists his draft year, but did score 35 goals.
Both are 5'10".
I thought of Wellwood while watching last night's game, as Timashov found stick after stick through legs and skates.
Of course Antropov was an adept passer as well, but 6'6", 240 lbs.
What you describe there is actually what most would call the characteristics of good agile skating. It's very encouraging because it's probably much easier to increase your foot speed than become a more agile skater.
Ulf mentioned Kyle Wellwood as a pretty solid comparable that I tend to agree with. Not the fastest guy but very slippery with his edging, vision and great hands. Wellwood fell off badly due to poor conditioning and of course Timashov is a different person and likely not going to go through the same off ice issues as Wellwood. Probably the lower end of his ceiling though.
If he develops at a high level, Nicklas Backstrom plays a similar game. Not a top goal scorer but a fantastic playmaker that can dominate with the right linemates. Backstrom is bigger though and a faster skater. This is not likely for Timashov, but he develops at a high level then maybe there's a very slight chance.
David Desharnais from the Habs is also a player Timashov plays similarly too. Probably the middle ground between Wellwood and Backstrom.
It really depends on how he develops.
Playing style and talent, I think Wellwood wouldn't be a bad comparison, although Timashov seems more dialled in and hopefully willing to work off the ice
I wonder where Timashov goes? SHL? Q?
Timashov's point production and overall performance wasn't as good at the end of the season and in the playoffs last season, that might explain why he fell. However, with the pre-season, season, playoffs and Memorial Cup, he played just over 100 games. That's a lot for a first year euro who's not used to that kind of calendar.
Hopefully he doesn't have the baggage Wellwood was carrying around.
I'd like to see him back in Sweden to be honest. I would love to watch him more closely in the Q but I think the SHL would be really good for his development. He would need to find a SHL team that he could be play top 6 minutes though. Tuck him away for 2 years until he's AHL eligible, then he makes his way to the Marlies.
Why is he not AHL eligible now? Has he signed a CHL deal? If not, then he should be good to join the Marlies. If he has, doesn't he need to go to the CHL if he's not on our roster?
Why is he not AHL eligible now? Has he signed a CHL deal? If not, then he should be good to join the Marlies. If he has, doesn't he need to go to the CHL if he's not on our roster?
He was drafted out of the CHL, therefore his eligibility is of the right of a CHL player.
His current CHL contract is expired however, therefore his choices are NHL, CHL (Quebec still has his rights I do believe) or Europe.
So would the Europeans need to knowingly enter the CHL import draft? What if he didn't want to be drafted by the CHL (so that the AHL could remain a possibility)?
Edit: \Got Timashov and Dzerikals confused. I see. My bad. Carry on!