- Dec 12, 2017
- 25,466
- 12,045
Of course notI'd love to have him back, but not willing to give him the money + term he will be seeking
Of course notI'd love to have him back, but not willing to give him the money + term he will be seeking
Mirtle more so than Jonas, but both of them are generally pro-Dubas or pro-Leafs.Is it Jonas or Mirtle that’s big pro Dubas fan? I always mix them up on the podcast but one of them is always going out of there way to defend Dubas?
Thanks for sharing that s/s, was wondering exactly who was up, knowing it was a good amount. ROR did not seem to indicate any interest in returning but he and Schenn are the only ones I'd want back, at discounts.View attachment 709730
Videos - NHL, NBA, NFL, Super Bowl, CFL, MLB, Golf, Tennis, Soccer
TSN's latest highlights and features from around the sporting world. NHL, NBA, NFL, CFL, MLB, PGA, LPGA, MLS, EPL, Bundesliga, Ligue 1, La Liga, Serie A, FIFA World Cup, Euro, ATP Tennis, WTA Tennis, Curling, Scotties, Brier, World Juniors.www.tsn.ca
Thanks for sharing that s/s, was wondering exactly who was up, knowing it was a good amount. ROR did not seem to indicate any interest in returning but he and Schenn are the only ones I'd want back, at discounts.
I hope to hell we are spared another minute of Kerfoot or Holl, use that 5.5m much better
Hopefully it's somewhere else.I wouldn't be surprised to see Matthews become the league's highest paid player on a deal of longer term either. I felt more frustration with the lack of term from the previous contract than I did the AAV. It sounds as though this could be more of the same.
I know Kerfoot has positive analytics, but our bottom six is too easily manhandled and he scored just 10 goals, really doesn't have any ability to drive offensive play and doesn't forecheck at all. We need to move away from players like that, too many of them and I prefer Lafferty over him for his bigger size and better physicality.Kerfoot is useful on a cheap deal. I'd like to move away from Holl and re-sign Schenn, maybe push Gio out and Brodie play the left.
ROR I have no interest in since he was terrible and will be overpaid.
Aciarri I'd like back for the 4th line, something like Lafferty - Holmberg - Acciari would have some forechecking ability, be defensively responsible, and has an offensive touch.
I can't say the same quite as easily without knowing how the rest of the team might look.Hopefully it's somewhere else.
Just read on MSN sports that insiders report O Reilly won’t sign with the Leafs. Not a big deal prob best for both sides. He wants to go deep in post season and Leaf’s need to do a retool at the very least.
Both CJ and Kypreos have come out and said he wasn’t crazy about his time here.Interesting!
If true just goes on to show what ROR thinks of Leafs' chances of going deep in post season with this core.
Both CJ and Kypreos have come out and said he wasn’t crazy about his time here.
Probably all of the above. Marner playing with his Pokémon cards, Tavares eating his food through a straw and Dubas hangin out with his boys in the locker room, towel fightIf there is an ounce of truth to this... Thank you for your services Auston. Good luck with your new team (except against the Leafs when Leafs aren't tanking)
WOW. Any more story about why that might have been the case?
Media? Locker Room? Culture? Coach? Playing Role? Minutes? Anything else?
???
Excellently said.As the owner of a business for the over 30 years, I would have a real problem with what Dubas is doing here, assuming of course that the media reports are true.
Assuming they are true, I look at this situation this way.
The context here is that I’m offering an employee, who has achieved what I would consider to be pretty average results, a contract extension for the job they are already doing. I’m moving forward on the premise that the employee’s performance will hopefully continue to improve with additional experience in the role. The position being offered is considered to be one of the most high profile and desirable positions in the industry, and I’m offering the employee a higher compensation package. Something I assume the Leafs are offering.
So on that basis, I make an offer and the employee’s response is to go public, tell other people, including other employees, that they’re not sure they want to continue in the role as it’s been very demanding, very taxing and that they will need extended time to think whether they want to commit to continuing in the role.
As an employer, I would hear and see that response and say; I would like to thank for your previous service as well as your consideration. However, I expected a much more enthusiastic and positive response to my offer. Given your comments about your reservations about continuing in the role, I’m going to have to politely withdraw my offer. I thank you for your previous service, but at this point I need to look for someone who is ready to fully embrace and commit to this opportunity and is enthusiastic to fill this role.
Thank you once again for your service and best of luck with your future endeavours.
Thank you.Excellently said.
Is it Jonas or Mirtle that’s big pro Dubas fan? I always mix them up on the podcast but one of them is always going out of there way to defend Dubas?
As the owner of a business for the over 30 years, I would have a real problem with what Dubas is doing here, assuming of course that the media reports are true.
Assuming they are true, I look at this situation this way.
The context here is that I’m offering an employee, who has achieved what I would consider to be pretty average results, a contract extension for the job they are already doing. I’m moving forward on the premise that the employee’s performance will hopefully continue to improve with additional experience in the role. The position being offered is considered to be one of the most high profile and desirable positions in the industry, and I’m offering the employee a higher compensation package. Something I assume the Leafs are offering.
So on that basis, I make an offer and the employee’s response is to go public, tell other people, including other employees, that they’re not sure they want to continue in the role as it’s been very demanding, very taxing and that they will need extended time to think whether they want to commit to continuing in the role.
As an employer, I would hear and see that response and say; I would like to thank for your previous service as well as your consideration. However, I expected a much more enthusiastic and positive response to my offer. Given your comments about your reservations about continuing in the role, I’m going to have to politely withdraw my offer. I thank you for your previous service, but at this point I need to look for someone who is ready to fully embrace and commit to this opportunity and is enthusiastic to fill this role.
Thank you once again for your service and best of luck with your future endeavours.
I'm not a fan of any of those moves, if you are trading Marner you need to get a young top pairing D, IMO. It's way easier to find top 6 wingers in UFA with the cap space the Leafs will save.
That's the best approach. You only get one childhood team. Anyone suggesting to adopt a new team either never had one or never tried. Just have to ride it out.Personally, I'm not changing teams because I dislike the GM, I've been a Leaf fan longer than he's been on this planet, I just don't support the team under his direction. The last couple of season's I only add posts here when there's a hope he'll be replaced, once it's confirmed he's still the GM I crawl back into my hole. There's no sense point incessantly repeating that you can't win paying half your cap to 4 players all year long, therefore I let his lack of success speak for itself..........
I'd love to have him back, but not willing to give him the money + term he will be seeking