ER89
Registered User
- Jul 25, 2018
- 4,827
- 4,913
Surely you mean give him three breaks.Morgan Rielly just came back from injury, give him a break.
Surely you mean give him three breaks.Morgan Rielly just came back from injury, give him a break.
47. I actually came by to say that I sat in the handicap overflow, in the corner, upper level with the Leaf scouts and execs on my left. Really nice, friendly, decent people. But jeez, some of you have a lot to live up to. For them, I wish the team a world of success.All 46 Arizona fans got their money's worth!
All we needed was one goal from one of the 28 million dollars worth of forwards we had to gain a point in this game. But yeah let's focus on Rielly, who just came back from lengthy injury.Surely you mean give him three breaks.
He was one of the leafs best players vs Tampa... Check advanced stats.I love Mo. He's a Leaf legend. But, is a safer defensive minded defensive approach without him and a tighter forward group a better game plan? They played so good defensively without him, but you could notice his benefits offensively with him involved.
Imagine if the Coyotes were somehow contenders and there was the potential of at least 2 Stanley cup final games being played in that arena??I cannot emphasize this enough.
Watching this game, from that camera view, with one team consistently gaining the zone by skating around the outside of a much slower D, felt like watching a Bantam House League game from the 12th row of the stands at Forest Hill Arena.
Fourth goal was caused by Rielly’s poor play. He’s just not a very good defender who gambles way too much and is caught out of position as a result. For someone who gambles so much you’d think he’d have a goal after 20 games played.
It was a terrible gamble at that, in what world does that puck get through on the boards when there's two Coyotes on the wall? Even if they both fail to block the pass, the guy receiving it now has two Coyotes forwards within 5 feet of him and a defenseman coming to close him off, there's nowhere good to go with that puck.
0 upside big downside gamble at a crucial time.
trade him!, the team was way better off without him.. hell he was the cause of one of those goals tonight, but Murray had a bad night tonight..0-1 with Reilly
Rielly puckin sucks and ruins the team chemistry, man! Make a blockbuster at the deadline for a solid foward... puck this clown, he sucks, the team was SO GOOD when he wasn't in the lineup.Feels bad man
close your mouth!So, I have some bad news...
no, he had a bad game, Murray that is...and yes, Rielly puckin sucks and I hope Dumbass has the balls to trade him before or at trade deadline. we don't need him, the team was firing on all cylinders before he came back.exactly.
Murray didnt give up any stinkers.
Rielly caused 2 goals.
Matthews offensive game really shan't been there all season though. I know him and Nylander / JT and Marner have led to wins but maybe you see if Mitch can get Matthews going again and Nylander can try and get JT out of this slump.It's not the losses, it's the type of game opponents play that the Leafs top talent have trouble.with.
They have as much talent as any team in the league but noone would compare this teams talent as driven as that of Boston or Tampa.
Matthews has played a smart two way game this year but something is up with him. My guess is he is playing through an injury like a good soldier, wanting to will himself to assure the team makes the playoffs. Sundin, Clark and Gilmour all did the same at times.
They've played well all season, not with this defensive effort though. Defense and goaltending has been their strength. Not tonight.
They were noticeable,don't even know how many shots they rang off the post or missed the net, but yeah looking at the boxscore you wouldn't believe none of them put up a single point with3 goals scored.Did mathews marner Nylander and tavares play?
A legend?? Don't diminish history of Salming, Sittler, Baun, Kennedy, Conacher, Bower etc by calling this guy a legend just yet. Maybe he will be, not now.I love Mo. He's a Leaf legend. But, is a safer defensive minded defensive approach without him and a tighter forward group a better game plan? They played so good defensively without him, but you could notice his benefits offensively with him involved.
We will NEVER win anything of note with him as our supposed #1 D. I have been saying it for years now and always get lambasted. The guy just Cannot play DEFENSE period. He's very low IQ, muffin shot, dosent block shots etc etc....He skates like the wind is tantamount to saying he's all dressed up with no where to go....clueless....this team and the mgmt DISGUST ME....and I've been following them for more than 50 years...oh, how I miss the good old days when players had heart, played with heart & HATED TO LOSE....these prima donnas are going no where....I hope everyone gets canned!He can be the top 6 LW we are looking for
How you can even begin to think about pointing the finger at Liljegren amazes me. Rielly laid out pizza to the other team, made an ill advised, half ass pinch along the boards, leaving Liljegren to defend an ensuing 2 on 1. If Rielly is going to keep playing the most minutes every night, this team will continue to go nowhere.I mean Liljegren didn't help matters. What was he doing there?
The curse of Arizona is catching up with the curse of Buffalo
Did mathews marner Nylander and tavares play?