GDT: Leafs at Habs (Now, Saturday)

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/
Status
Not open for further replies.

tinyzombies

Registered User
Dec 24, 2002
16,926
2,393
Montreal, QC, Canada
Team isn't THAT far off....

1. Go with Guhle-Matheson and get a vet for the second pair?

2. And we need someone to win the 2RW job whether Dach moves to the top line or not. So, Gallagher needs a resurgence basically. If Dach is a center, Monahan moves to wing.

Barron needs to go down unless he rights the ship- meaning in an hour. Mailloux could be on our third pairing now, but probably better to get badly needed reps running things in Laval. I wouldn't be surprised if he's up soon tho.

As for bottom 6, if we can't put together a good bottom 6 with all these bodies...

I think that puts us on the bubble if we get health.

Montembault/Allen is good enough to get us to the bubble. And Dobes is intriguing.

People are yapping about Ottawa and Buffalo, but we have way better team defense. I think we'll be in the mix with the Detroits and Floridas.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Habs Icing

HabsWhiteKnightLOL

Registered User
Apr 29, 2017
35,550
47,176
Somewhere on earth in a hospital
I’m talking about the opposition. Where facing AHL teams, hard to evaluate any players
We struggled to beat an almost full ahl roster against Ottawa while we had our 2 best players who once again carried us to victory against goons.

You don't need to ice big quality to beat us , the second Suzuki and Caufield are well guarded , rest crumbles most of the time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Canad13ns

morhilane

Registered User
Feb 28, 2021
7,840
10,325
We struggled to beat an almost full ahl roster against Ottawa while we had our 2 best players who once again carried us to victory against goons.

You don't need to ice big quality to beat us , the second Suzuki and Caufield are well guarded , rest crumbles most of the time.
That Ottawa roster was about the quality of what the Habs had in yesterday game against the Leafs, with more experienced Ds (Ottawa had better D).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: HabsWhiteKnightLOL

ChesterNimitz

governed by the principle of calculated risk
Jul 4, 2002
5,687
12,327
Xhekaj has not looked good so far either... def don't want him on his off-hand. Laval might be good for him too. Maybe trade for Deslauriers if they send him down, but I doubt they do.

If Mailloux is ready, they need to make room is my point.
If these first few exhibition games have shown anything, though possessing significant potential, Mailloux is not ready for prime time. Rushing this promising young player is not good for either Mailloux or the team.
 
Last edited:

tinyzombies

Registered User
Dec 24, 2002
16,926
2,393
Montreal, QC, Canada
If these first few exhibition games have shown, though possessing significant potential, Mailloux is not ready for prime time. Rushing this promising young player is good for neither Mailloux nor the team.
I think Mailloux is ready for the third pair, because that's mostly mano-a-mano on the wall and he can do that now. Positioning though, he likes adventure. I like his aggressiveness, he just needs minutes. I think he's a top 4 though, for sure. And soon. But I agree, the third pair won't teach him what he needs - he needs to play a big role in Laval to prepare him for his ceiling. I mean, unless he continues to progress right now...
 

montreal

Go Habs Go
Mar 21, 2002
58,503
43,596
www.youtube.com
Just my opinion, but as a coach in a training camp, you would want the struggling guys in uncomfortable situations. You are not there to help with confidence right now. There is another time for that. You are there to see if they can get out of the shits by themselves.
To me, this means they are not sure they believe Barron has it in him. They are testing him.

Not sure he’ll be part of the starting lineup if Matheson is healthy to start. Again, he’s slow out of the gate.

it doesn't make sense to me. I wouldn't put Mesar with 2 guys that can't score in the AHL as what kind of test is that, what do you learn from that as it's not like he's likely to ever really be in the situation long term in the NHL if he were to make it.

If you see a player is struggling with confidence, no matter when you need to work with them as they aren't seasoned vets that know how to handle this.

But the Habs have been making many poor decisions with development over the years so every little mistake gets highlighted more until we start to see these guys do in fact know how to develop these kids or not.
 

MadMslm

Registered User
Jun 16, 2018
2,105
2,525
If it's all Norlinder again I'll be pretty upset yeah

I didn’t mind them putting Norlinder in the spotlight to show his abilities. He did alright on the powerplay. But you’re right, they should have split it and gave Guhle some reps.

We usually bury those player with nobodies with limited ice time and then act surprise when they don’t use their strengths.

It’s just Guhle never gets that chance to shine. Since last year I’ve been hearing “yeah we know Guhle is good but we want to try this guy”. When does he actually get a chance especially in a game where he was displaying his playmaking ability and he’s never scared to activate deep in the zone.

Last night, Mailloux should have had that chance over Beaudin.
 

HabsWhiteKnightLOL

Registered User
Apr 29, 2017
35,550
47,176
Somewhere on earth in a hospital
If these first few exhibition games have shown, though possessing significant potential, Mailloux is not ready for prime time. Rushing this promising young player is good for neither Mailloux nor the team.
Mailloux is not making it , he had 100 games like in the last 3 years. He needs to go to the AHL with Barron and perhaps JackEye if he doesnt get his shit up
 

tinyzombies

Registered User
Dec 24, 2002
16,926
2,393
Montreal, QC, Canada
I think they are pretty far off, this year will tell us more though since now we will have so many prospects in the AHL.
I think the vets are taking it easy because they are coming off injury. But this team is deep and can play a two-way game. Caufield is pretty much the only guy who isn't a two-way. And we are deep down the middle. There's also size sprinkled in there. Also, our powerplay should be much improved if we are healthy. Guhle and Matheson need to have big years. If that happens, I think we are a bubble team.
 

montreal

Go Habs Go
Mar 21, 2002
58,503
43,596
www.youtube.com
I think the vets are taking it easy because they are coming off injury. But this team is deep and can play a two-way game. Caufield is pretty much the only guy who isn't a two-way. And we are deep down the middle. Also, our powerplay should be much improved if we are healthy. Guhle and Matheson need to have big years. If that happens, I think we are a bubble team.

for sure the vets are taking it easy as that's what you do in preseason. I don't think this team is deep at all, I'd say the exact opposite, we have almost no high end talent and that is highly troubling.

I also don't agree at all that the PP should be much improved, it will suck donkey balls again.
 

tinyzombies

Registered User
Dec 24, 2002
16,926
2,393
Montreal, QC, Canada
for sure the vets are taking it easy as that's what you do in preseason. I don't think this team is deep at all, I'd say the exact opposite, we have almost no high end talent and that is highly troubling.

I also don't agree at all that the PP should be much improved, it will suck donkey balls again.
Define donkey balls.
 

tinyzombies

Registered User
Dec 24, 2002
16,926
2,393
Montreal, QC, Canada
What stands out to me is the center depth and the number of forwards who can play d. We need Guhle-Matheson to play together if we want a top pair (altho neither guy is really a playmaker, Guhle does find guys and is a great breakout passer). That leaves a gaping hole on the second pair though. I think that's really the only major problem.

You can move these guys around until you find something that clicks. Newhook probably too small to be on the top line, so... But as a 3C he'd be outstanding. If Monahan refinds his touch around the net...

1696112040082.png
 

MadMslm

Registered User
Jun 16, 2018
2,105
2,525
What stands out to me is the center depth and the number of forwards who can play d. We need Guhle-Matheson to play together if we want a top pair (altho neither guy is really a playmaker, Guhle does find guys and is a great breakout passer). That leaves a gaping hole on the second pair though. I think that's really the only major problem.

You can move these guys around until you find something that clicks. Newhook probably too small to be on the top line, so... But as a 3C he'd be outstanding. If Monahan refinds his touch around the net...

View attachment 747742

This team will be competitive most games, but It’s hard to believe it will translate to the standings.

The Atlantic division is too strong and you have other powerhouses in the Metropolitan.

There’s also multiple question marks throughout the line up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Runner77

tinyzombies

Registered User
Dec 24, 2002
16,926
2,393
Montreal, QC, Canada
This team will be competitive most games, but It’s hard to believe it will translate to the standings.

The Atlantic division is too strong and you have other powerhouses in the Metropolitan.

There’s also multiple question marks throughout the line up.
Boston is due for a dip, Florida screwed up a bit with their roster, Tampa just lost Vasi for two months (and who knows - back surgery) and have an aging Stamkos they might not re-sign... and have lots of miles....

We really need to catch Detroit who loaded up on vets and maybe Florida for a wild card spot. Ottawa and Buffalo have great offensive potential, but can they stop the puck from going in?

But again- we have a second pairing problem on D. We have boatloads of third pairing guys, but need a solid second pairing vet - another Matheson (or a Petry...).
 

Habs Icing

Formerly Onice
Jan 17, 2004
19,924
11,756
Montreal
Team isn't THAT far off....

1. Go with Guhle-Matheson and get a vet for the second pair?

2. And we need someone to win the 2RW job whether Dach moves to the top line or not. So, Gallagher needs a resurgence basically. If Dach is a center, Monahan moves to wing.

Barron needs to go down unless he rights the ship- meaning in an hour. Mailloux could be on our third pairing now, but probably better to get badly needed reps running things in Laval. I wouldn't be surprised if he's up soon tho.

As for bottom 6, if we can't put together a good bottom 6 with all these bodies...

I think that puts us on the bubble if we get health.

Montembault/Allen is good enough to get us to the bubble. And Dobes is intriguing.

People are yapping about Ottawa and Buffalo, but we have way better team defense. I think we'll be in the mix with the Detroits and Floridas.
And I suspect Tampa will be seriously affected with their world-class goalie out for 8 to 10 weeks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Runner77

Gustave

Registered User
Feb 15, 2007
8,467
5,867
Here
@tinyzombies I appreciate the analysis and your take. I am taken aback by your feelings that this team isn’t that far off… to the point of getting a 2D this season to help the team right away.

I think last year’s team paints a picture that’s very similar to this year; Young D, unexperienced, team on the whole is soft to a fault, G’s that aren’t all that to be honest. Also… our special teams were a mess, and nothing has changed so far in my eyes on that front.

I can see that you feel that growth might take care of those issues with the personnel in place, but I’m wary of the second year slump for our rookies. It might be a wash between some growth while others regress.

Your positive input is cool though, I won’t complain if the players actually do carry the weight into March, will make it a bearable winter time :laugh:
 

Frankenheimer

Sir, this is an Arber
Feb 22, 2009
3,949
1,715
MTL
Maybe we'll even get a first for Dvorak... a man can dream.

I think it’s a possibility but has to be on last year of contract as most playoff teams are at cap limit. And yes, he’s the kind of player who could add depth for a playoff run. We’ve lost a sense of what it’s like to compete for cup and what sacrifices may be needed when the time comes. It’s almost impossible in this cap world to build a sustainable, constant playoff contender, so we will spend firsts too.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad