Confirmed with Link: Leafs acquire Dzingel, Lyubushkin from ARI for Ritchie, c.2nd... Dzingel on waivers &claimed

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Would like to see an all-time Paper Leafs only roster. Goaltending looks good to start (Kolzig, Lehner). Dzingel, McCann, Skoula...I know there's more. Anyone?
 
Would like to see an all-time Paper Leafs only roster. Goaltending looks good to start (Kolzig, Lehner). Dzingel, McCann, Skoula...I know there's more. Anyone?
Nathan Horton - can't remember if he played? Marc Savard or was that a rumour? These paper Leafs ugh.
 
Last edited:
I swear players are 90% more likely to be claimed on waivers if it's a Leaf player
 
Symptom of running a short roster. We probably waive more players than anyone else. For several year we've run 21-22 man rosters, while most other teams budget for 23. If management doesn't want to risk losing 14th forwards for nothing, they can always budget accordingly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Golden_Jet
I swear players are 90% more likely to be claimed on waivers if it's a Leaf player
Honestly if you're an NHL/AHL tweener why wouldn't this be your first call looking for a job in free agency.

Both clubs in the same city.

higher AHL salary than most teams can afford.

If you don't stick you're chances of being claimed and staying in the league is much higher.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rdogg
Symptom of running a short roster. We probably waive more players than anyone else. For several year we've run 21-22 man rosters, while most other teams budget for 23. If management doesn't want to risk losing 14th forwards for nothing, they can always budget accordingly.
You're better off using that money to top load your roster than carry an extra league min salary player.
 
You actually think this is a plot rather than them just liking our players?

It's not a plot.

It's just that Leafs are on display like no other. And there are more teams that like to stick it to the Leafs than any other team.

Do you really think that list of players there is a list of more valuable players than other teams have waived?
 
You're better off using that money to top load your roster than carry an extra league min salary player.

Sure, but paying Matthews and Marner 11.5 & 10 instead of 11.64 & 10.9 is the difference between losing almost a dozen guys on waivers. You can still be the most top-heavy team in the league and not lose guys for nothing.
 
It's not a plot.

It's just that Leafs are on display like no other. And there are more teams that like to stick it to the Leafs than any other team.

Do you really think that list of players there is a list of more valuable players than other teams have waived?
Geez, get over yourself.
 
Sure, but paying Matthews and Marner 11.5 & 10 instead of 11.64 & 10.9 is the difference between losing almost a dozen guys on waivers. You can still be the most top-heavy team in the league and not lose guys for nothing.
This is not and has not been an issue.

Why waste cap space on players sitting in the pressbox? That would be an obvious sign of poor management. They can't play no matter what happens that game.
 
This is not and has not been an issue.

Why waste cap space on players sitting in the pressbox? That would be an obvious sign of poor management. They can't play no matter what happens that game.

At the very least it would spare us the fan temper tantrums and conspiracy theories over losing guys on waivers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad