Confirmed with Link: - Leafs acquire Darren Raddysh for 2026 5th | Raddysh signs, 8 years, $8.5M AAV | Page 48 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Confirmed with Link: Leafs acquire Darren Raddysh for 2026 5th | Raddysh signs, 8 years, $8.5M AAV

  • If you are having issues logging in, we have found opening the log in page in a new tab/window rather than using the pop out should resolve these issues. We are working to get this resolved and thank you for patience.
  • Congrats to our latest Sportsbook winners - GOLD MEDAL kihei, SILVER MEDAL fish7 and BRONZE MEDAL Sammy Kat - new tournament begins today 6/15


Not even Mirtle can get this right.

In the article it says.

Raddysh’s extension will carry an average annual value of $8.5 million a season, a league source said. The contract includes a full no-trade clause for the first six years and a 16-team no-trade clause for the last two years.

Sounds like first six years -> NMC , last two years -> NTC (16 team list).
 
Sounds like first six years -> NMC , last two years -> NTC (16 team list).
My interpretation, can't be waived for entire contract, but can be traded to 15 teams in year 7&8.

Capwages:

Clause Details: Full No-Move Clause for the entire contract; full No-Trade Clause for the first six seasons; Modified No-Trade Clause with a 16-team list for the final two seasons.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Budz and sxvnert
Raddysh is a luxury for Tampa since they already have Hedman, McDonagh, Moser and Cernak all signed. If you look at their lineup, they need scoring.
It signifies Hedman is going to play next season. Had they not changed the LTIR playoff rules I bet they would have re-signed Raddysh and signed Carlson, LTIR Hedman until there was cap space and went into the playoffs with all three.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sxvnert and Brobust
Have to admit, I like the confidence Chayka is displaying. No hesitation to diving right back into the business of human being transactions.
It is refreshing to see Chayka not be terrified and go out and make some riskier moves...I just sit back and think "What were we thinking?" when it comes to Tre and his ability to actually build a team. His low risk-low reward trades like Joshua and Maccelli seem so bland and predictably bad in hindsight.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: PanniniClaus
It is refreshing to see Chayka not be terrified and go out and make some riskier moves...I just sit back and think "What were we thinking" when it comes to Tre and his ability to actually build a team. His low risk-low reward trades like Joshua and Maccelli seem so bland and predictably bad in hindsight.
Absolutely.

Seems like there is cohesion from the C suite to to the ice. I don’t know if it’ll work but it’s a prerequisite to winning, so there’s that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: usernamezrhardtodo
His title says it’s 6 years NMC then 2 years 16 team NTC

The article says 6 years full NTC then 2 years 16 teams NTC.

Which is right? You don’t get both a NMC and NTC.
I think the NMC can carry into the last 2 years in the sense that he can't be dropped into the AHL. His 16 team no trade clause kicks in after year 6. He just worded it strangely.
 
Don't want Stecher back with Villeneuve ready.

Would run:

McCabe Raddysh
OEL Tanev
Andrae Villeneuve/Danford 50/50 split
Went to the Marlies game last night and now I understand why they never really brought up Villeneuve. He was not good. Like at all. He kept fumbling the puck and is pretty slow on top of it. That's not even critiquing his play to lose the game in overtime. I don't think he holds a candle to Danford when it comes to skating or even moving the puck. I am actually pretty impressed with Danford. I think he will be a solid 2nd pair guy like McCabe.
 
Absolutely.

Seems like there is cohesion from the C suite to to the ice. I don’t know if it’ll work but it’s a prerequisite to winning, so there’s that.
I would rather go down swinging for the fences than just sit in the mushy middle hoping that lightning will strike.

I keep picturing Tre walking around with an aluminum ladder in a thunderstorm....
 
The only counter to that is that Kuch is such a wizard on the half board, he has the abilty to hold space and slow time down.

I'd say both are probably true though. Raddy got a boost from being on a PP with Kuch, but he still has a bomb and is a big threat.
Personally I would be putting McKenna on the half boards, Raddysh on the point, Matthews in the bumper, Knies at the net front, and Nylander on the other flank. I think McKenna should be in that Kane/Kucherov role along the half wall. He has that elite vision.

tempImageH0mbdL.jpg
 
You know... in a down year for the Leafs, they had a higher PP success rate than Tampa did.... That's without a setup forward, and without a good D to man the PP... Add McKenna, and now Raddysh to some combo of Matthews + Nylander and Knies/Tavares, and there is no question in my mind, that this years version of Toronto's PP will be improved over last years, which was already more successful that Tampa's.
Raddysh has a powerful point shot, and that is something Leafs have been missing,

Morgan Rielly's point shot on the PP was not going to get things done.

I'd have preferred Raddysh at 5 years term but not 8.
 
My interpretation, can't be waived for entire contract, but can be traded to 15 teams in year 7&8.

Capwages:

Clause Details: Full No-Move Clause for the entire contract; full No-Trade Clause for the first six seasons; Modified No-Trade Clause with a 16-team list for the final two seasons.

6 years of full NMC is not great, but to be expected in an age where everyone outside of AHL mid-season call-ups get full NMCs.

The flexibility in the last 2 seasons is critical. If his contract is an anchor by then or he's just extra baggage, 16 potential trading partners without asking for his sign-off is a whole lot better than zero and trying to convince him to give at least 1 team he'll waive for.

In future, I hope Chayka and any other Leafs GM insists on a team list in the final years of long-term contracts vs full end-to-end NMCs, specifically for those contracts that will stretch well into the player's 30s, regardless of how big of star they are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ULF_55
Sounds like first six years -> NMC , last two years -> NTC (16 team list).
I suppose I am nitpicking, that is one more year than I was hoping but with a 16 team list basically if he is still a sought after D Man by that point that one of the teams would be interested than the contract aged well.

NMC are the bane of my existence and I don't even sign the cheques.
 
Not to burst your bubble but the leafs have Matthews, Nylander, Tavares and now PP magician McKenna on the PP1 unit. Raddysh will get his cookies.

Are we sure Raddysh is not a 1 year wonder or just a late bloomer??

1781916817146.png


Prior to last year his career best was 6 goals and 37 points, and 6 goals and 33 points in the 2 prior years with TB.

Hopefully at midnight he doesn't turn back into a pumpkin. :wg:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad