You guys have yourself a gem.
My favorite prospects are the ones that outshine the 1st rounders.
Like that little 4th round gem on the Flames.![]()
You knew where I was getting with that.
Back to the Flyers' prospect, is he playing in the NCAA for another year? Or will he be getting some AHL time?
He left college and signed with the Flyers. He will be in the AHL.
Could be the next Brian Campbell if things go right
I really don't see that comparison. Ghost is a much more aggressive player.
In term of what? Physicality? I employ you to go look at the umberger hit. If your talking offensively then I disagree. Brian Campbell is a very good puck mover
In term of what? Physicality? I employ you to go look at the umberger hit. If your talking offensively then I disagree. Brian Campbell is a very good puck mover
He was noticeable every shift he was on! Flyers could have a nice crop of D coming with a Ghost, Morin, Hagg, Sanheim, and Alt. Three guys who have the potential to be #1 Dmen.
I like all of your prospects, but I think you're fanboying too hard.
I hate the word potential. It's impossible to say how good a human can be. In theory anyone could raise there game to x levelThey have the potential, it doesn't mean it's likely they'll reach it
I like all of your prospects, but I think you're fanboying too hard.
I hate the word potential. It's impossible to say how good a human can be. In theory anyone could raise there game to x level
Which is obviously not how the terms "potential", "ceiling", and "floor" are used in the context of hockey players, as they're used to indicate the speaker's perceived realistic approximations of those attributes. I'm sure this doesn't need to actually be explained further and you're just playing devil's semantic advocate.