ijuka
Registered User
- May 14, 2016
- 23,187
- 16,414
It puzzles me why you're confused about people taking things personally when you yourself constantly make it personal. Still, let me tell you about it since you yourself brought it up.Also - ijuka - weird that you were following an 11 year old. Thats really weird.
Every year, I scan through Finnish junior leagues for well-performing underagers who I've not seen before. Double underagers generally, but 1 age group underagers who do very well will do as well. If I find one, I try and watch one game and decide if they're worth paying attention to. Most years, I don't find anyone.
For Kiviharju, it was D2 juniors(Finnish u13 league) - double underager defenseman. 14 games, 47 points - second on team has 38 points. League lead was 52 points in 25 games. Now, even double underagers at that level, very very rare. There have been a couple though, like Frans Karjalahti more recently. But none have lead their team in scoring. And as a defenseman? See, even leading a team in scoring as a defenseman at all is extremely rare, no matter the age, no matter the age group. Even if it's the best player on the team by a good margin. It's not like a forward, at least in Finnish hockey. You practically never see such a thing. But I never follow players off scoring alone, it requires what we call "eye test". So I look at the games he's played.
This, the first shift of the first game I ever watch, right off the first faceoff at the game's start(#11):
How common would you say it is being able to do that at 10 against players 2 years older? Well I can tell you, at least in Finland, it is not. Like I've said, most "eye tests" amount to nothing.
So that's when I decided to start following him.
Last edited: