Speculation: Larry Brooks: Canucks possibly going to make a run at Lafreniere

bernmeister

Registered User
Jun 11, 2010
28,712
4,234
Da Big Apple
They had a Eichel-sized cap hole the entire offseason.
not if you recognize Eich is 5 yrs obligation, so it is not just this yr to make cap fit and also, they knew at some pt they were gonna get hit w/heavy #s for both Fox and Zib.

Eich should not have been considered by NY due to risk w/neck issues, at least not until after seeing him healed and how effective then; but pretty much only way to add at 10m or so size deal was for them to sell high on zib now as an expiring rental. No other way for cap to fit.
 

Richard88

John 3:16
Jun 29, 2019
19,407
21,158
Brooks pulls stuff out of his @$$ every now and then. I think the idea he’s going to get moved to the Canucks because of his agent is silly and speculative.

That being said, this is a strange year for the Rangers. Hes stuck behind Kreider and Panarin on the depth chart, they need a Top 6 RW and another Center in the worst way, and they’re ahead of schedule on their rebuild, but do they really want to start moving major assets to start taking shots at a cup run?
They should have traded that 1st overall pick for a top young center when they had the chance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Team Cozens

57special

Posting the right way since 2012.
Sep 5, 2012
49,933
21,765
MN
Laf is only 20 years old, give him some time to adjust to the pros and he will be solid in another year or two.
Solid is not what you expect from the #1 oa. You want "dominant", "electric", "brilliant". Guys like Zegras, Seider, Raymond, Stutzle, Lundell, Drysdale, Robertson, Mercer are outplaying him... maybe even guys like Jarvis and Boldy.

I wish I could say that I see something in him, but he just looks kind of slow, and peripheral right now. I thought he was a sure thing coming out of junior.

No blame on the NYR for picking him, or Kakko. They were the clear and obvious consensus picks in their respective draft years.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Team Cozens

Taluss

Registered User
Jul 28, 2018
8,324
5,992
NYC
Laff will be worth pennies on the dollar if he doesn't find another gear next year. Rangers have a chance to win now and the return for Laff now could give them an edge.

Theres not a player avaliable that Laf can be traded for that would make Rangers a cup contender. So its not worth trading him. Especially considering how bad that trade can look years down the line
 

Team Cozens

Registered User
Oct 24, 2013
6,604
3,904
Burlington
not if you recognize Eich is 5 yrs obligation, so it is not just this yr to make cap fit and also, they knew at some pt they were gonna get hit w/heavy #s for both Fox and Zib.

Eich should not have been considered by NY due to risk w/neck issues, at least not until after seeing him healed and how effective then; but pretty much only way to add at 10m or so size deal was for them to sell high on zib now as an expiring rental. No other way for cap to fit.
Have you not followed Tampa the last 4 years??? They don’t care about next years cap. They go for Stanley Cups and then figure it out in the off seasons. Winners aren’t afraid to go for it.
 

LordZapp

Registered User
Jan 31, 2015
2,169
1,561
Texas
That trade was 4 years ago, I think it is safe to say Miller has developed a bit. Also, JT Miller was in no way a throw in.

Rangers got:
Nemestikov, who was having an excellent season, and looked to be breaking out.
Recent 1st in Brett Howden
Recent 2nd in Hajek
1st round pick
2nd round pick

Do you really think all 5 assets were for McDonaugh?

Yes, honestly that is the return you would expect for an elite 1D in his prime at that time.
 

Nucklehead Supreme

Registered User
Jul 10, 2011
4,387
2,377
If you believe Canucks fans they’d only be happy if Lafreniere was the sweetener in a Miller trade. They want way more. It’s ridiculous

A few people with bad takes, not the entire fanbase, most of us are far more rational about it and don't even expect Laf alone in a trade for Miller.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Qwijibo

Qwijibo

Registered User
Dec 1, 2014
3,578
3,567
A few people with bad takes, not the entire fanbase, most of us are far more rational about it and don't even expect Laf alone in a trade for Miller.
That’s good to hear. I’ve seen Canuck proposals along the lines of Schneider, Lafreniere, Othmann and a 1st for Miller at 50% retained. Lol
 

Rangeri

Registered User
Sep 29, 2020
210
236
Lapland
Have you not followed Tampa the last 4 years??? They don’t care about next years cap. They go for Stanley Cups and then figure it out in the off seasons. Winners aren’t afraid to go for it.
Tampa knew exactly what their core is before they won, Rangers still figuring it out. Their situation differs.
 

bernmeister

Registered User
Jun 11, 2010
28,712
4,234
Da Big Apple
Solid is not what you expect from the #1 oa. You want "dominant", "electric", "brilliant". Guys like Zegras, Seider, Raymond, Stutzle, Lundell, Drysdale, Robertson, Mercer are outplaying him... maybe even guys like Jarvis and Boldy.

I wish I could say that I see something in him, but he just looks kind of slow, and peripheral right now. I thought he was a sure thing coming out of junior.

No blame on the NYR for picking him, or Kakko. They were the clear and obvious consensus picks in their respective draft years.

more than fair, and actually kind upon reflection. The key here is a consensus on his skating not quite NHL level, but that is continuously improving and by mid next season he could well be on his way
 

bernmeister

Registered User
Jun 11, 2010
28,712
4,234
Da Big Apple
Have you not followed Tampa the last 4 years??? They don’t care about next years cap. They go for Stanley Cups and then figure it out in the off seasons. Winners aren’t afraid to go for it.
That statement is reckless. This is how you wind up having to take on a Seabrook for cap.
It is always smarter to control the cap rather than let the cap control you.
And, nothing wrong with playing it with measured risk on an extended window instead of going too far and missing all in.
Some of those deals on the '94 Rangers were necessary, but I get the feeling had we kept Mike Gartner and been smarter about 1-2 others we'd be better off w/better shot at more cups
 

Nucklehead Supreme

Registered User
Jul 10, 2011
4,387
2,377
That’s good to hear. I’ve seen Canuck proposals along the lines of Schneider, Lafreniere, Othmann and a 1st for Miller at 50% retained. Lol

After years of living in shit, a few fans are shooting for the moon, we'll never get that much for Miller. Period.
 

Lion Hound

@JoeTucc26
Mar 12, 2007
8,349
3,778
Montauk NY
Hate the idea for the NYR.

Miller was a solid player for the Rangers…They got fleeced on initial deal to Tampa. Undoubtedly the worst trade they made in quite sometime.

Commit to a rebuild get all sorts of assets only to and then trade the first OA in their history after only 2 incomplete seasons for the player they gave away for a box a shit from Tampa. not to mention you get two years of that player. Also worthy of note, he’s a LW who seems to play Center but not his primary role.

Drury did well with Reaves and Goodrow. Terrible with Nemeth and Tinordi. Messed up the Kravtsov situation. He did terrible with Buchnevich deal. With that said his team has overachieved thus far. Too little of a track record to gauge what he will do next, but a deal for a long term rental for a former 1st OA sounds to me like a terrible hand.
 

Quinning

Registered User
Mar 18, 2008
26,983
14,532
I would say there are three tiers of offers from the Rangers.

Offer 1: Underpaying

Kravtsov, Barron, 1st 2022

Offer 2: Fair Value

Schneider, 1st 2022

Offer 3: Overpaying

Lafreniere, Barron, 1st 2022
 
  • Like
Reactions: Canucks LB

Kocur Dill

picklicious
Feb 7, 2010
3,180
1,678
That statement is reckless. This is how you wind up having to take on a Seabrook for cap.
It is always smarter to control the cap rather than let the cap control you.
And, nothing wrong with playing it with measured risk on an extended window instead of going too far and missing all in.
Some of those deals on the '94 Rangers were necessary, but I get the feeling had we kept Mike Gartner and been smarter about 1-2 others we'd be better off w/better shot at more cups

I forget exactly what I read but Gartner was a Messier or Keenan thing. One of them put it in Neil Smith's head that Gartner wasn't the type of personality that does what it takes to win the Cup.
 

bernmeister

Registered User
Jun 11, 2010
28,712
4,234
Da Big Apple
I forget exactly what I read but Gartner was a Messier or Keenan thing. One of them put it in Neil Smith's head that Gartner wasn't the type of personality that does what it takes to win the Cup.
Thanks for the share. I wouldn't put it past either Messier who I respected, or Keenan, who I don't.
Pt is, there is no given. And that was when it was easier to so call 'buy a cup' if you had $$. We were fortunate as there were worthy opponents including that yrs VAN if I remember. Gartner, Zubov, coupla others, I'd re-examine options there.
 

jackjohnson

Registered User
Feb 9, 2021
8,093
5,331
I would say there are three tiers of offers from the Rangers.

Offer 1: Underpaying

Kravtsov, Barron, 1st 2022

Offer 2: Fair Value

Schneider, 1st 2022

Offer 3: Overpaying

Lafreniere, Barron, 1st 2022

2nd offer needs a third piece to be fair. A late 1st and Schneider gets you in the door but needs another piece to entice JR to pull the trigger right away. That piece could be a Nils Lunkvist or Othman.
 

Team Cozens

Registered User
Oct 24, 2013
6,604
3,904
Burlington
Tampa knew exactly what their core is before they won, Rangers still figuring it out. Their situation differs.
Eichel was exactly the Rangers needed and they had the cap space. It was a massive mistake to not go all in to get a 1C. Laf, Kakko or anyone. Elite 1C players are unicorns and they let one go because they were afraid of the what ifs.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad