He started visibly slowing down before Xmas, before 4 nations, and even right now I'm noticing it as well. That extra break for the 4N helped him out.
The entire Habs team is going to be abused. They have Alex Newhook in their top 6 and Mike Matheson playing 25 minutes. Montreal even making the playoffs is like a Stanley Cup for this team. Suzuki is a horse but it's clear even he's running on fumes, and probably injured.
It's no surprise that one who dabbles in hyperbole would consider basic reading comprehension as mental gymnastics.
True or not, that poster's flippant dismissal of criticism with the same response is childish and not in the spirit of good discussion.
It’s not a reading comprehension issue at all. You just think it’s a different thing when you do it vs when someone else does because you’re biased. It’s as simple as that. Textbook cognitive dissonance and hypocrisy.
I loved prime Karlsson and defended him when a lot of non Ottawa fans didn't. I honestly think Hutson can be better.
It’s a lot easier for a little guy to have a big motor due to physiology and he avoids a lot of physical contact so it’s really not surprising he has gotten better with more experience considering.
Easily. EK was at one point considered the #2 or #3 player in the league and carried his team of scrubs to one win away from the Cup finals.
Yup EK was easily one of the best players in the world before his career was derailed by Matt Cooke. Even after he was damn good and instrumental in the sens ECF drive. As a hockey fan, I can appreciate great players even if they play on teams I am really indifferent about, like the Sens. But he wasn't nearly as good as Hutson is when he was 20/21 and a second year player in the league.
You make a good point. I anticipate him making his mark in Round 1 and shutting down the Caps.
It's OK buddy, come to the sound of my voice
Great point - in this case, cognitive dissonance would be if i actually held contrasting opinions about the same thing. But, as evidenced, I don't - you just misinterpreted when you attempted to ctl+F cherry pick posts I made. A valiant try (as was using these big psychology words), but alas, a miss.
Not even close. His insinuations were very clear. He also uses the “If you watch the games, …” comment as a passive aggressive little jab to insinuate other people haven’t watched. It’s throughout his profile.Your logical fallacy is ambiguity
You used a double meaning or ambiguity of language to mislead or misrepresent the truth.yourlogicalfallacyis.com
From what I can tell he's talking about voters, not about people here. That's a pretty significant difference. One is disdain for the media, which is pretty commonplace. The other is an ad hominem against HFBoards posters.
It is clearly cognitive dissonance: you tried to take the moral high ground about people accusing others of not watching the games, but you’re guilty of it yourself, repeatedly. You are now trying to rationalize your hypocrisy by claiming it was different when you did it. Your response is classic, literally by the book lmao.
