1909
Registered User
- Jul 6, 2016
- 21,468
- 12,000
Same from your part. Go ask yourself to those who drafted him.That’s second guessing.
Same from your part. Go ask yourself to those who drafted him.That’s second guessing.
You missed the jokeSame from your part. Go ask yourself to those who drafted him.
In your reality I keep armia as that bottom 6 vet. I agree Mesar might be good one day but won't get that chance to reach his full potential here I don't think.I think Mesar's future like Mailloux will be with another team. I expect them to be traded at some point. I tink they'll both be valuable enough to get good vets for them to help the team compete. They'll return more than Barron imo specially Mesar if he has a good year in the AHL.
Caufield - Suzuki - Slaf
Laine? - Dach? - Demidov
Heineman - Beck - Vet?
Anderson - Xhekaj - Gallagher
If Dach doesn't work Hage will eventually replace him or we'll try to acquire a vet. If Laine doesn't work out Dach could evetually be moved to wing to repace him. When Gallagher's and Anderson's contract will end one will likely be replaced by another vet and the other maybe by Tuch or Davidson. I don't see a spot for Mesar tbh. And i did not even consider us signing Evans because i'm really not sure we will if KH believes in Back.
Hutson - vet?
Guhle - Reinbacher
Xhekaj - Engstrom
Again i don't see any spot for Mailloux unless he develops very well and Reinbacher doesn't.
No. They were just plain lucky he was still there. Like Caufield few years before. Lack of size was the main reason in both cases. As for Mesar, I will never understand what they saw in him that as so special.
I'm not sure they valued Hutson higher than Mesar and Beck. I think if they did they would have taken him 26th or 33rd.No, they calculated he would be there and he was.
They did the same thing for Konyushkov Miller and Xhekaj in the next draft.
These are freely available clips in their draft videos.
100%I'm not sure they valued Hutson higher than Mesar and Beck. I think if they did they would have taken him 26th or 33rd.
I wanted him picked with one of the earlier picks.They obviously knew what they were doing though. It’s easy now to sit here and second guess everyone else now that Hutson’s a star. But he was a 5’7 gamble. The Habs had to be thinking that he’d get passed over- which he did.
That’s very possible. I don’t think we’ll ever know.I wanted him picked with one of the earlier picks.
I’m just saying the habs drafted their players in their order of preference. They didn’t flip the order based on the hope he’d still be around at 62.
Fair enough.As someone commented (Morhilane?) … they tried to trade down in the 2nd round. I guess he slid from early/mid 2nd rd to late 2nd. They got a little lucky there, but were smart to take him when the opportunity presented, unlike others picking before them.
Newhook?I think Mesar's future like Mailloux will be with another team. I expect them to be traded at some point. I tink they'll both be valuable enough to get good vets for them to help the team compete. They'll return more than Barron imo specially Mesar if he has a good year in the AHL.
Caufield - Suzuki - Slaf
Laine? - Dach? - Demidov
Heineman - Beck - Vet?
Anderson - Xhekaj - Gallagher
If Dach doesn't work Hage will eventually replace him or we'll try to acquire a vet. If Laine doesn't work out Dach could evetually be moved to wing to repace him. When Gallagher's and Anderson's contract will end one will likely be replaced by another vet and the other maybe by Tuch or Davidson. I don't see a spot for Mesar tbh. And i did not even consider us signing Evans because i'm really not sure we will if KH believes in Back.
Hutson - vet?
Guhle - Reinbacher
Xhekaj - Engstrom
Again i don't see any spot for Mailloux unless he develops very well and Reinbacher doesn't.
This doesn’t make sense to me. Lane Hutson isn’t that fast a skater. He’s great at turning on a dime but he’s not what I’d call fast.His NHL edge skating stats are insane considering his speed was always in question.
View attachment 957836NHL EDGE Puck and Player Tracking Statistics - Skaters
NHL EDGE Puck and Player Tracking Statistics for skaters including skating speed, skating distance, shot speed, shot location, and zone time.edge.nhl.com
He's 95th percentile top speed and 96th for 20-22mph bursts (and 99th for 18-20mph).
For reference, those are similar numbers as Quinn Hughes this year (a bit better actually) and to his usual numbers. Hughes has a way better shot however, though he's improved it significantly every year since his draft year. It's still impressive to see that Hutson now has high end to elite speed.
This doesn’t make sense to me. Lane Hutson isn’t that fast a skater. He’s great at turning on a dime but he’s not what I’d call fast.
Now that we have recorded measurements like this, we don't have to rely on the eye test anymore. Subjective opinions aren't required when we data that demonstrates that he is indeed fast.This doesn’t make sense to me. Lane Hutson isn’t that fast a skater. He’s great at turning on a dime but he’s not what I’d call fast.
He's so deceptive he's fooled us all on his speed!!?This doesn’t make sense to me. Lane Hutson isn’t that fast a skater. He’s great at turning on a dime but he’s not what I’d call fast.
I disagree. Lately I've noticed he's been flying, which is why I went on NHL edge. They're objective measurements, it doesn't rely on the eye test, but on the actual numbers. Not only do they say he's fast, but they also say he's actually elite.This doesn’t make sense to me. Lane Hutson isn’t that fast a skater. He’s great at turning on a dime but he’s not what I’d call fast.