KevSkillz4
Registered User
- Apr 11, 2016
- 8,032
- 13,518
Don’t forget Cole’s goals…
trying not to hold on to that 30% sh% because it'll break my heart eventually, i'll focus on HutsonDon’t forget Cole’s goals…
Of course he won’t be 30 percent. He’s not going to 80 goals.trying not to hold on to that 30% sh% because it'll break my heart eventually, i'll focus on Hutson
People forget that while his s% is unsustainable his goal pace also is (74 goals pace). This is what you want to see. Even if you halve his s% he would still score 37 goals. It's Different than Paul Byron who scored 23 goals with an unsustainable s%. Since he had only 23 goals we knew once his s% would be back to normal that he would be back to 15 goals max.Of course he won’t be 30 percent. He’s not going to 80 goals.
But he might score 50!
People forget that while his s% is unsustainable his goal pace also is (74 goals pace). This is what you want to see. Even if you halve his s% he would still score 37 goals. It's Different than Paul Byron who scored 23 goals with an unsustainable s%. Since he had only 23 goals we knew once his s% would be back to normal that he would be back to 15 goals max.
Imaging watching this team without Hutson in the lineup. He's the only making this team exciting.
honestly add struble in there tooI find Suzuki, Caufield, Dach, Guhle and Slafkovsky exciting.. and there's the glimpses of things from Heineman, Kapanen that make things fun, too.
Sorry but you dont win cups with players like Caufield on your 1st line. He's going to end up as a 2nd line sniper that will score if he plays with 2 good linemates. Slaf and Demidov are the players that will bring you a cupSaid it before and I'll say it again, Caufield has the highest ceiling. He has superstar potential. He'll never be the complete player that others are, but the guy piles up goals and has a great offensive sense. He's not perfect but when you score the way he does, you don't have to be.
Still needs to prove it. Even if he has a great season this year, still needs to do it consistently. But I think he has the capability to be among the absolute best scorers in the league.
Out of all those guys?
it's tough between Slaf and Caufield. I see Caufield as a guy who can consistently score close to 50 goals a year if healthy. Slaf will be a much more complete player and I think rack up some points. Those goals are so valuable though. I'd probably lean CC. If CC had been healthy, I think we'd have seen a couple of 45-50 goal years already.
Hutson is very interesting but his size and position knocks him down from the others. He could easily be the best of the group. A true unicorn in how he plays.
Suzuki is the most solid, reliable player on that list. Ultimately though, he doesn't have the upside that the others do. A complete, consistent player who is also extremely versatile but I don't see him being truly elite at anything. The others are somewhat unique in what they bring and Nick is probably the most easily replaced. That's not to say he isn't a great player or that he'd be easy to replace... but the others bring something that's really hard to find elsewhere. And while I find him consistently good, he's not consistently great. He's streaky and I'd like to see him level up more.
I'd probably draft it: Caufield, Slaf, Hutson and Suzuki.
Well Slaf and Demidov aren't winning anything without other top 6 forwards and a good D core + G , takes a village , something we haven't had in a long long time. Not to mention its gonna take another top 6 center. Caufield is fine we should be happy to have him. Maybe Demidov can play CSorry but you dont win cups with players like Caufield on your 1st line. He's going to end up as a 2nd line sniper that will score if he plays with 2 good linemates. Slaf and Demidov are the players that will bring you a cup
Even if you have his shooting %, it would still be deemed high.People forget that while his s% is unsustainable his goal pace also is (74 goals pace). This is what you want to see. Even if you halve his s% he would still score 37 goals. It's Different than Paul Byron who scored 23 goals with an unsustainable s%. Since he had only 23 goals we knew once his s% would be back to normal that he would be back to 15 goals max.
Yeah but 15% is definitely sustainable. There's around 60 players players who sustained a career 15% s% since 1993 (minimum 200 games). 20% is not though. 0 players sustained a career 20% s% since 1993 (minimum 200 games).Even if you have his shooting %, it would still be deemed high.
Caufield isn’t proven yet. But I think he establishes himself this year as a premier scorer. And yes, absolutely you win cups with those kinds of players. In fact it’s hard to win without those kinds of players.Sorry but you dont win cups with players like Caufield on your 1st line.
It takes a mix of players. And judging by how things are going, we’re going to wind up with lines 1A and 1B.He's going to end up as a 2nd line sniper that will score if he plays with 2 good linemates. Slaf and Demidov are the players that will bring you a cup
Not at all.Even if you have his shooting %, it would still be deemed high.
trying not to hold on to that 30% sh% because it'll break my heart eventually, i'll focus on Hutson
It seems to be working with him on PP 2. Gives us a threat for the other line. I don’t mind it.The best PP QB on the Habs is Hutson, it's probably gonna be yet another crappy year but at least put him on PP1.
AgreedI find Suzuki, Caufield, Dach, Guhle and Slafkovsky exciting.. and there's the glimpses of things from Heineman, Kapanen that make things fun, too.