Player Discussion Lane Hutson Part 2

Tabarouette

ben kin
Jan 28, 2013
15,084
5,008
mtl
1730313055770.png
 

LaP

Registered User
Jun 27, 2012
26,079
20,231
Quebec City, Canada
Of course he won’t be 30 percent. He’s not going to 80 goals.

But he might score 50!
People forget that while his s% is unsustainable his goal pace also is (74 goals pace). This is what you want to see. Even if you halve his s% he would still score 37 goals. It's Different than Paul Byron who scored 23 goals with an unsustainable s%. Since he had only 23 goals we knew once his s% would be back to normal that he would be back to 15 goals max.
 

Tabarouette

ben kin
Jan 28, 2013
15,084
5,008
mtl
People forget that while his s% is unsustainable his goal pace also is (74 goals pace). This is what you want to see. Even if you halve his s% he would still score 37 goals. It's Different than Paul Byron who scored 23 goals with an unsustainable s%. Since he had only 23 goals we knew once his s% would be back to normal that he would be back to 15 goals max.

don't you ever talk shit about my homie ti-paul, it was sustainable and he was a GOD
 

Trenbohabs

Registered User
Sep 25, 2024
68
47
Said it before and I'll say it again, Caufield has the highest ceiling. He has superstar potential. He'll never be the complete player that others are, but the guy piles up goals and has a great offensive sense. He's not perfect but when you score the way he does, you don't have to be.

Still needs to prove it. Even if he has a great season this year, still needs to do it consistently. But I think he has the capability to be among the absolute best scorers in the league.


Out of all those guys?

it's tough between Slaf and Caufield. I see Caufield as a guy who can consistently score close to 50 goals a year if healthy. Slaf will be a much more complete player and I think rack up some points. Those goals are so valuable though. I'd probably lean CC. If CC had been healthy, I think we'd have seen a couple of 45-50 goal years already.

Hutson is very interesting but his size and position knocks him down from the others. He could easily be the best of the group. A true unicorn in how he plays.

Suzuki is the most solid, reliable player on that list. Ultimately though, he doesn't have the upside that the others do. A complete, consistent player who is also extremely versatile but I don't see him being truly elite at anything. The others are somewhat unique in what they bring and Nick is probably the most easily replaced. That's not to say he isn't a great player or that he'd be easy to replace... but the others bring something that's really hard to find elsewhere. And while I find him consistently good, he's not consistently great. He's streaky and I'd like to see him level up more.

I'd probably draft it: Caufield, Slaf, Hutson and Suzuki.
Sorry but you dont win cups with players like Caufield on your 1st line. He's going to end up as a 2nd line sniper that will score if he plays with 2 good linemates. Slaf and Demidov are the players that will bring you a cup
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Gr8 Dane

The Gr8 Dane

L'harceleur
Jan 19, 2018
13,187
26,081
Montréal
Sorry but you dont win cups with players like Caufield on your 1st line. He's going to end up as a 2nd line sniper that will score if he plays with 2 good linemates. Slaf and Demidov are the players that will bring you a cup
Well Slaf and Demidov aren't winning anything without other top 6 forwards and a good D core + G , takes a village , something we haven't had in a long long time. Not to mention its gonna take another top 6 center. Caufield is fine we should be happy to have him. Maybe Demidov can play C
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lafleurs Guy

Mrb1p

PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
Dec 10, 2011
91,126
58,214
Citizen of the world
People forget that while his s% is unsustainable his goal pace also is (74 goals pace). This is what you want to see. Even if you halve his s% he would still score 37 goals. It's Different than Paul Byron who scored 23 goals with an unsustainable s%. Since he had only 23 goals we knew once his s% would be back to normal that he would be back to 15 goals max.
Even if you have his shooting %, it would still be deemed high.
 

LaP

Registered User
Jun 27, 2012
26,079
20,231
Quebec City, Canada
Even if you have his shooting %, it would still be deemed high.
Yeah but 15% is definitely sustainable. There's around 60 players players who sustained a career 15% s% since 1993 (minimum 200 games). 20% is not though. 0 players sustained a career 20% s% since 1993 (minimum 200 games).
 

Lafleurs Guy

Guuuuuuuy!
Jul 20, 2007
78,219
49,527
Sorry but you dont win cups with players like Caufield on your 1st line.
Caufield isn’t proven yet. But I think he establishes himself this year as a premier scorer. And yes, absolutely you win cups with those kinds of players. In fact it’s hard to win without those kinds of players.
He's going to end up as a 2nd line sniper that will score if he plays with 2 good linemates. Slaf and Demidov are the players that will bring you a cup
It takes a mix of players. And judging by how things are going, we’re going to wind up with lines 1A and 1B.

At the end of the day, you need to score to win. Demidov isn’t even in the league yet and Caufield hasn’t been healthy enough over a season to show what he can do. But if Caufield is scoring at a 50 goal rate, that’s absolutely a guy who qualifies for the first line. If you have choices like Dmeidov and Slaf then it simply becomes a game of mixing and matching. They may put Slaf with Cc for size reasons for example but maybe they’re centered by Dach or Hage…

The nice part is that Hutson can play with ALL those guys and help the entire lineup.
 

Lafleurs Guy

Guuuuuuuy!
Jul 20, 2007
78,219
49,527
Even if you have his shooting %, it would still be deemed high.
Not at all.

Cc’s shooting percentage over that 48 in 82 stretch was 18 percent. If he’d had that last year he’d have had 57 goals.

No, he’s not going to be 30 percent this year or whatever but 50 goals is well within his reach regardless. He just has to stay healthy. A good shooter like him should be over 15 percent shooting.
 

habbubba

Registered User
Jan 19, 2024
273
236
I find Suzuki, Caufield, Dach, Guhle and Slafkovsky exciting.. and there's the glimpses of things from Heineman, Kapanen that make things fun, too.
Everyone has varying degrees of what they deem exciting and good for you and whomever else is being so easily excited where as there are many that are more demanding and less easily impressed.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad