Miller Time
Registered User
- Sep 16, 2004
- 23,833
- 16,522
I'm not quite clear on why anyone cares wether it's been altered or not... The cup isn't awarded for a body building contest last I checked.
What are you talking about?
You're not correct - you've provided 0 evidence that the photo is altered, you haven't provided an original photo that shows what it was before the alteration, and you haven't even come up with a rational conclusion for why it would have been altered in the first place other than "it's the internet".
Bringing in Flat Earth arguments when you are the one with the conspiracy theory of an altered photo is a bit of a lack of self-awareness on your part. You are the one who is trying to disprove the legitimacy of something that has been posted without any real substance as to why it would be altered.
And your evidence for saying it has been altered is a bunch of photos from ~5 months ago, further away from Lane and where you can't actually see his upper legs.
The only thing at play here is that a sitting photo of Lane is being compared to a standing photo of MSL, where obviously if you had your legs sat on a flat surface it will push things laterally and make things appear bigger than they would if you were standing straight up.
The photo wasn't altered, the comparison is a flawed one - that's it. No one altered the photo and suggesting that Lane did no work in the off-season to make his legs bigger than they were 5 months ago would be the harder thing to prove.
His legs aren't as big as MSL's - but they didn't photoshop the photo. You just want to keep his notion of Lane being too skinny legged and skinny-butted in conversation and alive because that is your bias and what you have specifically spent pretty much 2 years arguing.
And when called on anything you just default to being older and more experienced in this or that than anyone.
Can tell we are in the dog days of summer. People arguing over whether a man's legs are photoshopped or not
Honestly not that stupid at all lol MTL fans are wild, look at what it's doing on just this site alone. This is marketing genius if shopped to stir up the Habs fans.I mean, ask yourself WHY would some amateur hockey page called Gino Hard decide to photoshop such a random photo? Out of ANY photo they could choose to alter... hey lets fool everyone and make LANE HUTSON'S thighs look bigger than they really are. Yeah, thatll generate so much money due to a few extra likes and comments.
Doesnt that sound completely stupid?
Honestly not that stupid at all lol MTL fans are wild, look at what it's doing on just this site alone. This is marketing genius if shopped to stir up the Habs fans.
Now idk if this photo is shopped, but it absolutely would not surprise me if so. Everything is altered these days. Somebody needs to sneak some photos under the stall next time he's taking a dump![]()
Or… it’s just the lighting and the angle.What are you talking about?
You're not correct - you've provided 0 evidence that the photo is altered, you haven't provided an original photo that shows what it was before the alteration, and you haven't even come up with a rational conclusion for why it would have been altered in the first place other than "it's the internet".
Bringing in Flat Earth arguments when you are the one with the conspiracy theory of an altered photo is a bit of a lack of self-awareness on your part. You are the one who is trying to disprove the legitimacy of something that has been posted without any real substance as to why it would be altered.
And your evidence for saying it has been altered is a bunch of photos from ~5 months ago, further away from Lane and where you can't actually see his upper legs.
The only thing at play here is that a sitting photo of Lane is being compared to a standing photo of MSL, where obviously if you had your legs sat on a flat surface it will push things laterally and make things appear bigger than they would if you were standing straight up.
The photo wasn't altered, the comparison is a flawed one - that's it. No one altered the photo and suggesting that Lane did no work in the off-season to make his legs bigger than they were 5 months ago would be the harder thing to prove.
His legs aren't as big as MSL's - but they didn't photoshop the photo. You just want to keep his notion of Lane being too skinny legged and skinny-butted in conversation and alive because that is your bias and what you have specifically spent pretty much 2 years arguing.
And when called on anything you just default to being older and more experienced in this or that than anyone.
No, the pic was absolutely suggesting that his legs have made huge gains
I keep getting attacked by the same posters who place their bias above evidence.
What's funny is that nobody seems to have even uploaded the source image. This was supposedly ripped off of instagram by someone on reddit, then cropped by a bunch of other groups.
()
I don't use instagram so that would be for someone else to verify.
The instagram post was posted by Shutdown a couple pages back.
Have to swipe to see the 2nd photo.
I'm not picking sides but this was funny!!!!!! TYYou're arguing with what I would consider to be the first truly carbon neutral human I've encountered. A man who can completely subsist off of consuming his own farts.
![]()
The other candidate would be Dach, but otherwise I agree.Hutson is very much going to be an "X factor" for us this season.
Definitely dach is the huge x factor. He was brought in to be the number 2 center. Played really well in his 26 minutes. But looking forward to a full season. Good problem to have regarding the defense though. Can use some of the prospects for offensive upgrades in the coming seasonsThe other candidate would be Dach, but otherwise I agree.
Bringing a true elite offensive option from the blueline has the potential of radically changing our overall offense to a point people underestimate. And this team has been lacking of an offensive defenseman of such talent since Markov (not that they play anything alike).
YesDoes he have a bigger offensive upside than PK Subban?
That's why I sit in the dark most days. I look freaking hot that way.All kidding aside,
As someone who’s working to get back in shape, you can look fantastic under the right lighting and angle.
Regular lighting? Not so much.
Does he have a bigger offensive upside than PK Subban?
The question is whether Hutson’s defensive limitations will offset his obvious offensive potential.
Considering Subban was never good defensively I still think Hutson will have a better career.The question is whether Hutson’s defensive limitations will offset his obvious offensive potential.
The Norris “Plus” platinum proDoes he have a bigger offensive upside than PK Subban?
He looked good enough defensively for two games he played a few months ago, but then there's a wide gap between that and being reliable enough games-in games-out and not become a weakness to exploit by the opposition.The question is whether Hutson’s defensive limitations will offset his obvious offensive potential.
We did have a lot of posts about X or Y chromosomes though.I actually think this is a first. Usually we only have lots of posts about X or Y busting.
God I hate the off season