Player Discussion Lane Hutson Part 2

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
When your team is in a rebuild, you need to have things to look forward to other then the wins. Hutson is delivering that for me right now. I want to see him on the ice, I get excited when he has the puck... always wondering what's he'll pull of. People keep saying that he wont be able to keep his style in the NHL and he's proving them wrong.

Play the kid, let him get comfortable in all situation. He'll make mistake... I dont care. make me dream kid!
 

These stats are no coincidence, these stats have been that way his entire career, at every level. Those are against Boston and Toronto, not Chicago and Anaheim eh.

Those of you that think he can't play defense will watch in not so many games when he is playing no.1 minutes.
It's a different way of looking at defensive play isn't it?
 
When your team is in a rebuild, you need to have things to look forward to other then the wins. Hutson is delivering that for me right now. I want to see him on the ice, I get excited when he has the puck... always wondering what's he'll pull of. People keep saying that he wont be able to keep his style in the NHL and he's proving them wrong.

Play the kid, let him get comfortable in all situation. He'll make mistake... I dont care. make me dream kid!

it's why I said I would have put him on PP1 from the start because he is the future, unless we get someone else that can be a #1 PP QB, as the Habs PP has been a nightmare for years and this is a league where it's very hard to be good if your PP sucks ass. If you had a Carey Price in net maybe but this organization at least for now badly needs a #1 PP QB and Hutson is the answer no question.

If people watched my Lane Hutson vids they saw what he can do, just a question of how effective can he be at such a light weight over a long season and in one day hopefully some long playoff runs. But you could always see that where ever he went he was able to put on a show. I've got almost 100 Hutson vids on my channel, if you haven't seen them by now I would suggest watching him closely.


















 
it's why I said I would have put him on PP1 from the start because he is the future, unless we get someone else that can be a #1 PP QB, as the Habs PP has been a nightmare for years and this is a league where it's very hard to be good if your PP sucks ass. If you had a Carey Price in net maybe but this organization at least for now badly needs a #1 PP QB and Hutson is the answer no question.

If people watched my Lane Hutson vids they saw what he can do, just a question of how effective can he be at such a light weight over a long season and in one day hopefully some long playoff runs. But you could always see that where ever he went he was able to put on a show. I've got almost 100 Hutson vids on my channel, if you haven't seen them by now I would suggest watching him closely.
It's only a matter of time before he's the number one guy. I don't think many people would disagree that he's probably already the best fit there.

However, the Canadiens have to be careful here. Matheson's value is pretty high due to his PP numbers and I don't see him as a long term solution here. So that means trading him sooner rather than later. And for the duration that he's here, it kinda makes sense to keep giving him those PP minutes so he doesn't lose his value.
 
It's only a matter of time before he's the number one guy. I don't think many people would disagree that he's probably already the best fit there.

However, the Canadiens have to be careful here. Matheson's value is pretty high due to his PP numbers and I don't see him as a long term solution here. So that means trading him sooner rather than later. And for the duration that he's here, it kinda makes sense to keep giving him those PP minutes so he doesn't lose his value.

I don't think his value is that high, but that depends on what anyone thinks high means. I have never cared for Matheson so I don't see the need to be careful here as I think GMs know what kind of player he is. I don't think he's the key to any big trade outside of a package.
 
I don't think his value is that high, but that depends on what anyone thinks high means. I have never cared for Matheson so I don't see the need to be careful here as I think GMs know what kind of player he is. I don't think he's the key to any big trade outside of a package.
It should definitley be a package. We have tons to trade with. And we need veteran help on the right side D. That makes the most sense. It lets Ghule move back to the left and takes the pressure off the younger blueliners. It's one thing to have a bunch of young forwards... a whole different thing to have young blueiners.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gustave
I don't think his value is that high, but that depends on what anyone thinks high means. I have never cared for Matheson so I don't see the need to be careful here as I think GMs know what kind of player he is. I don't think he's the key to any big trade outside of a package.
A bad reputation is very hard to overcome and Matheson reputation was not good he was pretty much given away for free twice. The first time he was traded for an almost retired Hornqvist who was on a bad contract. Hornqvist was almost a cap dump at this point. This trade was seen pretty much as bad contract for bad contract. Then Pens shipped Matheson to us for basically nothing. He'll have a good value at the TDL of the last year of his contract if he keeps playing well but ATM i don't think his value is as high as people think it id.
 
I don't think his value is that high, but that depends on what anyone thinks high means. I have never cared for Matheson so I don't see the need to be careful here as I think GMs know what kind of player he is. I don't think he's the key to any big trade outside of a package.
Yeah that's why I never really got into the whole "sell high" on Matheson stuff. I think he's a pretty OK 2nd pair D who's uniquely well suited for the specific role of "#1 on a bad team to keep the puck moving so your forwards get touches" but I don't think anyone around the league would have been fooled by the 62 point season last year and I doubt his value has changed much or will be much different as a pending UFA either.

I just don't really think he ever really had or would have had that much trade value, a contender would be looking at him as a 2LD puck mover and a bad team would be trying to add him as a token vet to fill the #1/leader role and keep the game flow respectable for their forwards as a puck mover. Neither of those roles are really the kind of roster chair GMs are going to pay a ton to fill.

Muzzin returned a 1st and a couple B prospects, Ekholm returned a 1st, 4th, and a B prospect, just don't really see how Matheson's value would be in that ballpark since those guys are/were clearly better players.
 
  • Like
Reactions: montreal
Yeah that's why I never really got into the whole "sell high" on Matheson stuff. I think he's a pretty OK 2nd pair D who's uniquely well suited for the specific role of "#1 on a bad team to keep the puck moving so your forwards get touches" but I don't think anyone around the league would have been fooled by the 62 point season last year and I doubt his value has changed much or will be much different as a pending UFA either.

I just don't really think he ever really had or would have had that much trade value, a contender would be looking at him as a 2LD puck mover and a bad team would be trying to add him as a token vet to fill the #1/leader role and keep the game flow respectable for their forwards as a puck mover. Neither of those roles are really the kind of roster chair GMs are going to pay a ton to fill.

Muzzin returned a 1st and a couple B prospects, Ekholm returned a 1st, 4th, and a B prospect, just don't really see how Matheson's value would be in that ballpark since those guys are/were clearly better players.

Only thing is that his cap hit is pretty palatable for a contending team. That does add some value if he can have another good season here.. first two games were better on the defensive side than last year but significantly worse offensively.
 

These stats are no coincidence, these stats have been that way his entire career, at every level. Those are against Boston and Toronto, not Chicago and Anaheim eh.

Those of you that think he can't play defense will watch in not so many games when he is playing no.1 minutes.
He just has the puck or gets it back fast. Fun to see defense does not only mean « stand in passing lanes and finish your check »
 
I know it’s early, but I think he sets the record for points by Habs first year dman. If he doesn’t get injured I’m saying 60-70 points.
I don't believe he is going to be close to 60-70 points. At best, I would say around 40-45 for his rookie year. Most of the rookie production goes down after December.

Remember how Logan Cooley has red hot in his first 20 games in the NHL?
 
I don't think his value is that high, but that depends on what anyone thinks high means. I have never cared for Matheson so I don't see the need to be careful here as I think GMs know what kind of player he is. I don't think he's the key to any big trade outside of a package.
His salary is barely 5m. If we retain 50% of his salary, I'm pretty sure we can get a first round pick for him.
 

Broken record time lol:

Hutson played 17:22 at even strength, only Kaiden Guhle (18:01) played more on the Canadiens. Hutson played 22:48 total, only Mike Matheson played more for Montreal. In those minutes, per Natural Stat Trick, the Canadiens outshot the Bruins 8-3, outscored the Bruins 2-0, and high danger scoring chances were 5-1 Montreal. This on a night where the Canadiens were outshot 28-21 at even strength, outscored 5-3, and tied in high danger chances 10-10. You can do the math to see how the Canadiens fared when Hutson was not on the ice.

And it’s not like Hutson did this against bottom six forwards and bottom pair defenders. He played 7:48 against Hampus Lindholm, 6:40 against Charlie McAvoy, 5:46 against David Pastrnak, 5:00 against Elias Lindholm, and 4:25 against Brad Marchand. In fact, no Habs defender played more at even strength against Pastrnak than Hutson. Despite this, when Hutson was on the ice at even strength, the Canadiens had 81.39% of expected goals, per Natural Stat Trick. The team as a whole was at 45.38%. Hutson also started more shifts in the defensive zone than any other Canadiens player at even strength.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad