Player Discussion Lane Hutson Part 2

Habs

It's going to be a long year
Feb 28, 2002
22,746
17,499
Where is the flip-flop in that statement, especially since the PP is a 1 D affair right now in Montreal.

The PP QB will likely be Hutson on one PP wave and Mailloux on the 2nd wave.

Because he then went on to say Reinbacher is a #1, after he took heat for his comments and that pick. Kent is covering his tracks on his players now, and careful what he says.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: nicehiss

Scriptor

Registered User
Jan 1, 2014
7,897
4,875
Why can't Huston and Mailloux be on the same wave?
It's not impossible, by any means, but it's not necessary either. based only projections to becoming a contender too many quality forwards will require PP time to go with two Ds on the first PP wave.

On top of Suzuki, Dach, Caufield and Slafkovsky, there would be two other impact forwards acquired, one via a trade in 2025 and one as an UFA in 2027, plus Roy that is a more than viable option on the right side of a PP.

That's 7 forwards for two PP waves, all able to justify playing on the first wave. Eight if you consider Newhook and his ability to easily gain the O-zone.

I'd go with Hutson and four forwards on the first PP wave and Guhle-Mailloux on the 2nd wave.

Because he then went on to say Reinbacher is a #1, after he took heat for his comments and that pick. Kent is covering his tracks on his players now, and careful what he says.
Paranoia is a good thing for some. I try to stay clear of it myself.

Some are clearly Jonesing from a time where they could take it out on Bergevin, regularly without class...
 
  • Like
Reactions: jaffy27

Habs

It's going to be a long year
Feb 28, 2002
22,746
17,499
It's not impossible, by any means, but it's not necessary either. based only projections to becoming a contender too many quality forwards will require PP time to go with two Ds on the first PP wave.

On top of Suzuki, Dach, Caufield and Slafkovsky, there would be two other impact forwards acquired, one via a trade in 2025 and one as an UFA in 2027, plus Roy that is a more than viable option on the right side of a PP.

That's 7 forwards for two PP waves, all able to justify playing on the first wave. Eight if you consider Newhook and his ability to easily gain the O-zone.

I'd go with Hutson and four forwards on the first PP wave and Guhle-Mailloux on the 2nd wave.


Paranoia is a good thing for some. I try to stay clear of it myself.

Some are clearly Jonesing from a time where they could take it out on Bergevin, regularly without class...

I have no idea what you are saying, but ok
 

Estimated_Prophet

Registered User
Mar 28, 2003
11,121
12,294
Matheson isn't lousy, he's just not a quarterback... he deserves to be on PP1, but for his one-timer.

Matheson's IQ isn't high enough to be a competent puck distributor on the PP. He consistently makes the wrong read and takes too long to move the puck. The key to a successful PP is creating and exploiting small triangles in the offensive zone and this absolutely requires quick reads and one touch passes which Matheson almost never does.

Lane will be a huge upgrade on the PP although he will have some catastrophic giveaways that will result in breakaways that Matheson would easily track down and neutralize but I am here for watching Lane figure it out.

Matheson isn't lousy, he's just not a quarterback... he deserves to be on PP1, but for his one-timer.

He is a PP2 guy at best.
 

Lafleurs Guy

Guuuuuuuy!
Jul 20, 2007
78,552
49,943
Matheson's IQ isn't high enough to be a competent puck distributor on the PP. He consistently makes the wrong read and takes too long to move the puck. The key to a successful PP is creating and exploiting small triangles in the offensive zone and this absolutely requires quick reads and one touch passes which Matheson almost never does.

Lane will be a huge upgrade on the PP although he will have some catastrophic giveaways that will result in breakaways that Matheson would easily track down and neutralize but I am here for watching Lane figure it out.



He is a PP2 guy at best.
Name an offensive blueliner who doesn’t have giveaways on the PP.
 

Habssince89

trolls to the IL
Sponsor
Apr 14, 2009
9,240
4,770
Vancouver, BC
Matheson gets far too much hate. He's taking the hit right now and eating the minutes to help the team. We've seen other D be forced into that role and they've completely bombed. MM is giving a great effort every night, and when Hutson joins, he'll be in a way better role and I think he'll be appreciated more. Its true he's not a QB, but he's not a scrub.
 

Ozmodiar

Registered User
Oct 18, 2017
6,327
7,662
Matheson gets far too much hate. He's taking the hit right now and eating the minutes to help the team. We've seen other D be forced into that role and they've completely bombed. MM is giving a great effort every night, and when Hutson joins, he'll be in a way better role and I think he'll be appreciated more. Its true he's not a QB, but he's not a scrub.
He’s prone to mistakes if you try to get too much out of him. Good player, just shouldn’t be the top minute eater.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Estimated_Prophet

tinyzombies

Registered User
Dec 24, 2002
16,948
2,399
Montreal, QC, Canada
Matheson's IQ isn't high enough to be a competent puck distributor on the PP. He consistently makes the wrong read and takes too long to move the puck. The key to a successful PP is creating and exploiting small triangles in the offensive zone and this absolutely requires quick reads and one touch passes which Matheson almost never does.

Lane will be a huge upgrade on the PP although he will have some catastrophic giveaways that will result in breakaways that Matheson would easily track down and neutralize but I am here for watching Lane figure it out.



He is a PP2 guy at best.
I agree Hutson-Matheson would be devastating on the powerplay and cover for each other’s deficiencies (on special teams anyway). MM probably won’t be a Hab for the long haul so might never know. His passing and creativity have always been the hole in his game (and that sometimes leads to glaring turnovers). He has the potential even at his age to be a stellar 2 with the right partner. And his one-timer is a straight-up bomb and is definitely PP1 worthy. You can’t ask him to create tho- he doesn’t do that. That’s why we got him for nothing. Letang even commented publicly that he thought it was a mistake.
 

ChesterNimitz

governed by the principle of calculated risk
Jul 4, 2002
5,820
12,646
Matheson gets far too much hate. He's taking the hit right now and eating the minutes to help the team. We've seen other D be forced into that role and they've completely bombed. MM is giving a great effort every night, and when Hutson joins, he'll be in a way better role and I think he'll be appreciated more. Its true he's not a QB, but he's not a scrub.
Excellent post. The team has much greater issues than the level of play and commitment that Matheson brings every night. I fear with Slafkovsky’s ascendancy, there will be more ‘focus’ on every minutia of this fine player’s efforts.

If you look for faults, you will find them.
 

tinyzombies

Registered User
Dec 24, 2002
16,948
2,399
Montreal, QC, Canada
Excellent post. The team has much greater issues than the level of play and commitment that Matheson brings every night. I fear with Slafkovsky’s ascendancy, there will be more ‘focus’ on every minutia of this fine player’s efforts.

If you look for faults, you will find them.
And Matheson was clearly playing hurt last month. I saw them in Arizona on the glass - he was right in front of me - and he was basically limping. He looks healthier now. And he hasn’t had any help. The talent is definitely there. Dude has tons of heart. I wouldn’t mind if he was a Hab for life.
 

Estimated_Prophet

Registered User
Mar 28, 2003
11,121
12,294
I agree Hutson-Matheson would be devastating on the powerplay and cover for each other’s deficiencies (on special teams anyway). MM probably won’t be a Hab for the long haul so might never know. His passing and creativity have always been the hole in his game (and that sometimes leads to glaring turnovers). He has the potential even at his age to be a stellar 2 with the right partner. And his one-timer is a straight-up bomb and is definitely PP1 worthy. You can’t ask him to create tho- he doesn’t do that. That’s why we got him for nothing. Letang even commented publicly that he thought it was a mistake.

The one-timer from the point is almost extinct and is only useful if the player taking them also has the ability to distribute which is becoming more and more evident that MM struggles in this regard. His feet and shot can place him on a PP2 but he has no business being part of aPP1 and I would not have him out there with Hutson (Whether Hutson can defend enough to even play in the NHL is another serious question). Hutson will negotiate his opportunity to do so at the end of the season and I want to see him work with Caufield in the umbrella with Suzuki as the bumper, Slaf on the right boards and Monahan low post/net front.

Next season Dach supplants Slaf and Slaf supplants Monahan.
 

tinyzombies

Registered User
Dec 24, 2002
16,948
2,399
Montreal, QC, Canada
The one-timer from the point is almost extinct and is only useful if the player taking them also has the ability to distribute which is becoming more and more evident that MM struggles in this regard. His feet and shot can place him on a PP2 but he has no business being part of aPP1 and I would not have him out there with Hutson (Whether Hutson can defend enough to even play in the NHL is another serious question). Hutson will negotiate his opportunity to do so at the end of the season and I want to see him work with Caufield in the umbrella with Suzuki as the bumper, Slaf on the right boards and Monahan low post/net front.

Next season Dach supplants Slaf and Slaf supplants Monahan.
It depends if you want to move him over to the right dot or not and have Suzuki in the middle (a shorter pass to Cole). And have Hutson run things up top. They’re gonna try it all. I don’t know if Matheson will be around tho, someone might offer something big at the deadline.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Estimated_Prophet

Don D

Registered User
Oct 15, 2017
454
561
Matheson isn't lousy, he's just not a quarterback... he deserves to be on PP1, but for his one-timer.
Matheson is a very good second pairing. As with other players on this team, they are playing "out of position" as the Habs do not have enough top shelf players. Lane will help, but he cannot immediately be a first pairing. More growing pains.
 

tinyzombies

Registered User
Dec 24, 2002
16,948
2,399
Montreal, QC, Canada
Matheson is a very good second pairing. As with other players on this team, they are playing "out of position" as the Habs do not have enough top shelf players. Lane will help, but he cannot immediately be a first pairing. More growing pains.
Lane will probably be an offensive specialist I would think
 

26Mats

Registered User
Jun 23, 2018
33,348
25,742
The one-timer from the point is almost extinct and is only useful if the player taking them also has the ability to distribute which is becoming more and more evident that MM struggles in this regard. His feet and shot can place him on a PP2 but he has no business being part of aPP1 and I would not have him out there with Hutson (Whether Hutson can defend enough to even play in the NHL is another serious question). Hutson will negotiate his opportunity to do so at the end of the season and I want to see him work with Caufield in the umbrella with Suzuki as the bumper, Slaf on the right boards and Monahan low post/net front.

Next season Dach supplants Slaf and Slaf supplants Monahan.

Dach is going to have to be taught to look to shoot when the time is right or he won't be on the half wall, but will only be ablre to play in front of the net.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad