Scriptor
Registered User
- Jan 1, 2014
- 7,897
- 4,875
He really didn't get the full replay he wanted when he said watch everything Lane Hutson does on the play leading to that goal.The call is legendary
He really didn't get the full replay he wanted when he said watch everything Lane Hutson does on the play leading to that goal.The call is legendary
How is he now close to 5'11" when he's officially 5'9" and 3/4?It does not change the fact that he needed to grow. All the IQ in the world will not be enough to become a complet D if your frame is 5'08" and 165 lbs. That's why the fact that he is now close to 5'11" is such a good news.
How is he now close to 5'11" when he's officially 5'9" and 3/4?
Close to 5'10" would be more like it and it is significantly better than 5'8".
On the ice he looks close to 5'10. Close enough that I don't think his height will hold him back. He's small but not tiny.How is he now close to 5'11" when he's officially 5'9" and 3/4?
Close to 5'10" would be more like it and it is significantly better than 5'8".
Interesting, was not aware. How big is the gap?
Yeah I just feel at the end of the day whatever the numbers say, he just doesn't seem 'too small' where it's a red flag.I looked at him on the videos of his goals friday, while he was cheering with his teammates, by comparison, he looked 5'11", maybe it's 5'10".5, but it's close to 5'11", and if not, given how much he grew in the last 8 months, he will likely reach 5'11".
So close to 5'11 means close to 6' right?? So officially we can say he's 6 foot!How is he now close to 5'11" when he's officially 5'9" and 3/4?
Close to 5'10" would be more like it and it is significantly better than 5'8".
How many games does he have left where stats count? I see the hockey east game is next. Does that count?
So he can actually break Leetch's record.yes it counts but you would have to know the future to know how many games he has left. At least 2, since games are one and done, so win and he has more then 2, lose both and seasons over.
So he can actually break Leetch's record.
Not sure how accurate NHLe Calculator is but it thinks Lane Hutson's numbers are more impressive in Hockey East. It predicts he would score 42 points in the NHL but if he was playing in the Big 10 it would translate to only 36 points in the NHL.The Big 10 is easily....and it isn't very close, the best group in the NCAA. Just take a look at the names in the top 10 scorers in every league and you can clearly see the talent gap. This season is absolutely no different than others in that sense.
I am not sure that most posters know this as they never mention it other than the poster Montreal and a handful of others. If Luke or Quinn Hughes played in Hockey East they very well may have out scored Hutson. Fox was in an even weaker ECAC so I am not trying to dismiss Lane's numbers but there is certainly some context that needs to be added to the conversation.
Lane Hutson is also playing in a superior league compared with the Big 10. Just wanted to point that out. Brian Leetch also played in the H-East program which is far superior compared with the Big 10.Hutson has 43 points in 33 games. His Draft+1 season. Best ever draft plus one D-man Brian Leetch 47 in 37. He's on pace to pass Leetch
Hutson has 43 points in 33 games. His Draft+1 season. Best ever draft plus one D-man Brian Leetch 47 in 37. He's on pace to pass Leetch
So close to 5'11 means close to 6' right?? So officially we can say he's 6 foot!
He's a 5'9 midget, that's what he is and what he will be. It doesn't matter what his height is, let's see how he handles the NHL. He's got elite generational collegiate skill, let's see how that translates to the big show.
If he was in the big 10, he would play better opposition, but it is wuite likely he would also play with better teammates. So there are two opposite factors at play here. I am not sure how that would influence the overall result, however.The Big 10 is easily....and it isn't very close, the best group in the NCAA. Just take a look at the names in the top 10 scorers in every league and you can clearly see the talent gap. This season is absolutely no different than others in that sense.
I am not sure that most posters know this as they never mention it other than the poster Montreal and a handful of others. If Luke or Quinn Hughes played in Hockey East they very well may have out scored Hutson. Fox was in an even weaker ECAC so I am not trying to dismiss Lane's numbers but there is certainly some context that needs to be added to the conversation.
If he was in the big 10, he would play better opposition, but it is wuite likely he would also play with better teammates. So there are two opposite factors at play here. I am not sure how that would influence the overall result, however.
He is closer to 5 11 than 5 8!How is he now close to 5'11" when he's officially 5'9" and 3/4?
Close to 5'10" would be more like it and it is significantly better than 5'8".
Lane Hutson's height deserves it's own thread. We can update daily and maybe even get him to post his latest height on occasion.