Lane Hutson Burgeoning Star Watch

bud12

Registered User
Oct 8, 2012
2,227
664
Based on everything he's accomplished the last few years?
Yeah but they will play him HARD and he's soo smallllllll. The guy create high danger chance each time he got the puck in the o.z( And it's not hard to see really) but that will magically disapear.:sarcasm: Some fans are so petty
 
  • Like
Reactions: Grate n Colorful Oz

Golden_Jet

Registered User
Sep 21, 2005
26,308
13,624
For sure a successful pick, but a far cry from a Hughes or Makar. That is my issue is the comparisons and hype train are out of control right now in Habs media and fanbase.

Why are they comparing a 2nd rounder 5 foot 8 dman with top 10 picks and not other small offensive dmen like Durzi or the many others before him who managed to have a career running a PP unit but never became a franchise dman?
Why are you picking Durzi, as a small defender to compare him to, he’s 6’1, 5 inches taller lol.😂
Adam Fox is a closer comparable.
Durzi isn’t close to the same size, as Hutson.
 

TheKrebsCycle

Throwing Confetti for Perfetti
Jun 1, 2011
7,177
2,650
Barrie
He's been our steadiest D for years, but ok dude. (with Guhle let's say)
He really hasn’t been . Just lives off his prior reputation . Matheson and Ghule were both much better last season . Additionally it’s not a strong corps to say the least so even by your own statement that isn’t saying much ..

Because Hutson has elite offensive talent. He's far more talented than Durzi...
That’s absolutely true but Durzi isn’t exactly tiny . So bit of a strange comp and dubious statement calling him small / comparable .
 
Last edited:

HockeyVirus

Woll stan.
Nov 15, 2020
19,556
29,937
Why are you picking Durzi, as a small defender to compare him to, he’s 6’1, 5 inches taller lol.😂
Adam Fox is a closer comparable.
Durzi isn’t close to the same size, as Hutson.

More about draft position and ability than size. 3rd rounder who can score like nothing
 

WhiskeyYerTheDevils

yer leadin me astray
Sponsor
Apr 27, 2005
35,398
34,146
His IQ is off the charts so there’s no reason to think his defensive game can’t improve drastically over time
He's a smart player, but I think it's actually his processing speed that is off the charts.

His IQ is good, but he still makes a fair amount of questionable decisions, like skating himself into trouble (still, he can usually get away with it).

I know that sounds like semantics, but I see them as separate though related concepts. His ability to process the information quickly is incredibly elite, but some of his instincts around what to do with that information can sometimes betray him.

I think that as he matures, some of the sub-optimal instincts that were honed vs junior/amateur hockey players will be replaced experiences vs men, which is why I agree with your ultimate conclusion that he should be able to improve immensely in his overall game.
 

Sasha Orlov

Lord of the Manor
Sponsor
Jun 22, 2018
8,953
21,212
He's a smart player, but I think it's actually his processing speed that is off the charts.

His IQ is good, but he still makes a fair amount of questionable decisions, like skating himself into trouble (still, he can usually get away with it).

I know that sounds like semantics, but I see them as separate though related concepts. His ability to process the information quickly is incredibly elite, but some of his instincts around what to do with that information can sometimes betray him.

I think that as he matures, some of the sub-optimal instincts that were honed vs junior/amateur hockey players will be replaced experiences vs men, which is why I agree with your ultimate conclusion that he should be able to improve immensely in his overall game.
I agree with your opinion and separation of the two concepts actually
 

rielledup

Registered User
Sep 17, 2015
632
607
He might not end up being good enough defensively to be a true #1 on a good team, that might be difficult given his size, but at the very least he's going to be special offensively. Offensively I think comparisons to Hughes and Makar are completely fair. Im a Leafs fan but I've watched his last couple games and he is definitely special with the way he skates with the puck and handles the puck and can slice through traffic.
 

WatchfulElm

Former "Domi a favor"
Jan 31, 2007
6,101
4,139
Rive-Sud
He really hasn’t been . Just lives off his prior reputation . Matheson and Ghule were both much better last season . Additionally it’s not a strong corps to say the least so even by your own statement that isn’t saying much ..

The internet is really full of weird opinions.

Sure, Matheson has better offensive numbers, but if your argument is that Matheson is the most steady D over Savard, then I would really like to try what you're smoking.

Savard has just won the Jacques-Beauchamp trophy 2 years in a row as the most underestimated player. He's been a rock, in the middle of a very young and unsteady D corp.

Maybe your opinion differs from everybody, it's your right, but just don't make your opinion sound like it's a fact, please.
 
  • Like
Reactions: viceroy

TBF1972

Registered User
May 19, 2018
8,373
6,845
He might not end up being good enough defensively to be a true #1 on a good team, that might be difficult given his size, but at the very least he's going to be special offensively. Offensively I think comparisons to Hughes and Makar are completely fair. Im a Leafs fan but I've watched his last couple games and he is definitely special with the way he skates with the puck and handles the puck and can slice through traffic.
if you talk about ceiling i can agree with you. if you talk about likely outcome i think it's a little bit too optimistic after less than 10 nhl games.
 

TBF1972

Registered User
May 19, 2018
8,373
6,845
The internet is really full of weird opinions.

Sure, Matheson has better offensive numbers, but if your argument is that Matheson is the most steady D over Savard, then I would really like to try what you're smoking.

Savard has just won the Jacques-Beauchamp trophy 2 years in a row as the most underestimated player. He's been a rock, in the middle of a very young and unsteady D corp.

Maybe your opinion differs from everybody, it's your right, but just don't make your opinion sound like it's a fact, please.
i had to look up what the jacques-beauchamp trophy is.

:DD
 

Agent Zuuuub

Registered User
Jan 2, 2015
15,282
12,737
Based on what? A few NHL games?

Seems you're one of the people who wouldn't have drafted him because he would never work in the NHL based on his junior or college game or something.

Meanwhile this guy has been able to generate offense at will.

He's closer to the best offensive defenceman than a lot of people like to admit.
 

HockeyVirus

Woll stan.
Nov 15, 2020
19,556
29,937
Seems you're one of the people who wouldn't have drafted him because he would never work in the NHL based on his junior or college game or something.

Meanwhile this guy has been able to generate offense at will.

He's closer to the best offensive defenceman than a lot of people like to admit.

This is my issue. He has 6 NHL games. I don't care at all what happened outside the NHL. Nick Robertson scored over a goal a game outside the NHL, it would be like him coming up and scoring and briefly leading the NHL in goals and Leaf fans claiming he is the new GOAT goalscorer.

For all the reasons I said above, lack of scouting on him, lack of urgency in players this early in the season and not as much commitment to defense as what we see later in the year, there is a reason we see random prospects catch fire and fizzle out as the year goes on every single year.
 

Agent Zuuuub

Registered User
Jan 2, 2015
15,282
12,737
This is my issue. He has 6 NHL games. I don't care at all what happened outside the NHL. Nick Robertson scored over a goal a game outside the NHL, it would be like him coming up and scoring and briefly leading the NHL in goals and Leaf fans claiming he is the new GOAT goalscorer.

For all the reasons I said above, lack of scouting on him, lack of urgency in players this early in the season and not as much commitment to defense as what we see later in the year, there is a reason we see random prospects catch fire and fizzle out as the year goes on every single year.

So what if he only has 6 NHL games?

His talent is nuts. He probably won't be as successful as those guys, as they are legends and have some advantages over him.

But in terms of talent? He's a closer to them than he is to Durzi.

And if you can't see it, you just can't see it. And you would not have seen it in Karlsson, Makar, Hughes, or Fox either.
 

The Gr8 Dane

L'harceleur
Jan 19, 2018
13,686
27,189
Montréal
His talent is nuts. He probably won't be as successful as those guys, as they are legends and have some advantages over him.

But in terms of talent? He's a closer to them than he is to Durzi.

And if you can't see it, you just can't see it. And you would not have seen it in Karlsson, Makar, Hughes, or Fox either.
More of these little stickhandling high offensive IQ freaks will be popping up with the way the game is going , people better get used to it
 

A55P2

Registered User
Jul 14, 2009
2,330
2,397
Québec, Québec
He's a smart player, but I think it's actually his processing speed that is off the charts.

His IQ is good, but he still makes a fair amount of questionable decisions, like skating himself into trouble (still, he can usually get away with it).

I know that sounds like semantics, but I see them as separate though related concepts. His ability to process the information quickly is incredibly elite, but some of his instincts around what to do with that information can sometimes betray him.

I think that as he matures, some of the sub-optimal instincts that were honed vs junior/amateur hockey players will be replaced experiences vs men, which is why I agree with your ultimate conclusion that he should be able to improve immensely in his overall game.
Solid, solid take!
 
  • Like
Reactions: WhiskeyYerTheDevils

I Hate Philadelphia

Registered User
Aug 10, 2015
2,282
5,571
Orlando, Florida
So what if he only has 6 NHL games?

His talent is nuts. He probably won't be as successful as those guys, as they are legends and have some advantages over him.

But in terms of talent? He's a closer to them than he is to Durzi.

And if you can't see it, you just can't see it. And you would not have seen it in Karlsson, Makar, Hughes, or Fox either.

I definitely trust this, coming from the fanbase who guaranteed that Erik Brannstrom was the next Erik Karlsson.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Voight

Bouboumaster

Registered User
Jul 4, 2014
10,826
9,321
I was impressed with him against Ottawa on Saturday night. He's tiny and yet he can control the game (offensively). He's the real deal, no doubt. However, if I was a Habs fan, I'd be worried about him getting steam rolled by a 6'4 power forward in his own end. As the season goes along, it'll be interesting to see how his body holds up to the rigors of the NHL.

It ain't happening, and if it actually do happens, we have an actual unhinged, über goon, that we can release and let loose on the team with the braindead moron who attacked Hutson

xhekah.jpg



If Xhekaj proved one thing during the offseason, it's that he doesn't give a f*** and will 100% target star players if needed

He went after Stützle this offseason with a semi-legal hit just because Greig was running away after he did another Greig-like bitchass move on one of our player
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sasha Orlov

Agent Zuuuub

Registered User
Jan 2, 2015
15,282
12,737
I definitely trust this, coming from the fanbase who guaranteed that Erik Brannstrom was the next Erik Karlsson.

What are you smoking lol?

Ottawa fans of all people knew that Brannstrom was no Karlsson, not even close.

Meanwhile I remember so many people like you who couldn't understand the talent of a Karlsson.

And would argue about how much better Luke Schenn or Del Zotto were.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad