TheKrebsCycle
Throwing Confetti for Perfetti
Savard has been bad for years ..Did you notice how Matheson, Savard and Barron were awfully horrendous? We, habs fans, have the privilege to see it every games
Savard has been bad for years ..Did you notice how Matheson, Savard and Barron were awfully horrendous? We, habs fans, have the privilege to see it every games
The positive thing is, he's so young it can easily be worked on. Look at Quinn Hughes in his first couple seasons for example, he was phenomenal offensively but a liability defensively. He's since worked on his defensive game and improved into an elite all around D-man, doesn't have the size but he makes the right plays and is good with his stick.He's an offensive dman, he's not an all-round defensive superstar. If his partner blows their coverage I'm not expecting him to make a fantastic defensive play to save the day.
Krug, Quinn, Spurgeon, Hughes have all managed to endure bigger forwards despite their size.I was impressed with him against Ottawa on Saturday night. He's tiny and yet he can control the game (offensively). He's the real deal, no doubt. However, if I was a Habs fan, I'd be worried about him getting steam rolled by a 6'4 power forward in his own end. As the season goes along, it'll be interesting to see how his body holds up to the rigors of the NHL.
No one cares about your 6 team league records unless we’re making fun of the Rangers for still not being able to win with 6 teams in the league.
and you might want to read the whole thread before posting.You might want to do a little research before you fire off your posts.
The Montréal Canadiens have won *ten* Stanley Cups in the post Expansion era.
When Hutson wins the Calder and finishes this season at almost a point per game, then you can start making this comparison.
Just wait until he quietly roars back... that's when you gotta watch out.READY TO BURN YOUR VILLAGE
What comparison? You said Hutson can't play defense because of the +/- he had, well I guess Makar can't play defense either since he had a bad +/- yesterday.
His IQ is off the charts so there’s no reason to think his defensive game can’t improve drastically over time
That highlight really shows one of the biggest flaws we hockey fans and the players have to endure. Look at those nicknames. Hutty, Eisey? They can't do any better than that? Every guy named Smith is called Smitty. Every guy named Jones is called Jonesy. It's time for hockey to do something about this. Why can't Lane Hutson be carrying the puck up the Hutson River Line or something like that? This complete lack of imagination must be stifling to the players.I'm a Bruins fan but also a longtime regular at BU games so I'm rooting for Lane to have a long career. His younger brother Cole, now a BU freshman, is fun to watch as well.
Savard has been bad for years ..
What I don't get is what sets him apart from all the other undersized guys who struggled defensively but could work magic with the puck? Like, I get he is young and can develop but defensively he will always be limited by his size in the NHL. Hutson is not boxing out his net or breaking the cycle.
Here is my take: We are a week into a new season. This is basically still pre-season for a lot of clubs. How does he do when teams start actually trying in the spring preparing for the playoffs? When teams scout him a bit more? When teams play him physically?
I see a lot of empty calories in his play so far (again he is young). Teams will allow him to stay to the outside, and he will dance around the perimeter stick handling like he is Patty Kane and then the media acts like he was McDavid on the shift when he didn't generate anything really dangerous.
So for the 4th time, he is so young it is impossible to tell what he becomes, but as of right now, the fact he is being put in the same sentence as Q. Hughes, Makar, etc is absolutely mental.
What makes him like those guys and not like a Durzi who is also an undersized mid round pick, bad defensively, but can put up points like nothing?
If Hutson can put up points like Durzi, he's a successful pick and player for them. Of course they'll need to surround him with the right people to make up for his deficiencies, but it wouldn't shock me to see Reinbacher be that guy for them. Guhle is playing decently, and Barron may yet grow into a top 4 D man.... That's at least three top four D men, and Barron... once everyone matures... that's not a bad start. Savard needs to be replaced with a veteran who can actually help, and eventually Xhekaj will be replaced with an upgrade as well.
For sure a successful pick, but a far cry from a Hughes or Makar. That is my issue is the comparisons and hype train are out of control right now in Habs media and fanbase.
Why are they comparing a 2nd rounder 5 foot 8 dman with top 10 picks and not other small offensive dmen like Durzi or the many others before him who managed to have a career running a PP unit but never became a franchise dman.
Because Hutson has elite offensive talent. He's far more talented than Durzi...
For sure a successful pick, but a far cry from a Hughes or Makar. That is my issue is the comparisons and hype train are out of control right now in Habs media and fanbase.
Why are they comparing a 2nd rounder 5 foot 8 dman with top 10 picks and not other small offensive dmen like Durzi or the many others before him who managed to have a career running a PP unit but never became a franchise dman.