That doesn't make it impossible. Not even that hard. Are there any decent engineers on this board? Put three detectors in the ice under the goal that can determine the distance between the detector and the center of the puck. Triangulate the location of the puck in space and compare it to the goal plane. Geometry.
All I'm saying is that it's a solvable problem. I'm not an engineer, but I'm sure there are decent engineers that could solve this problem without that much effort. It's 2015. We landed men on the moon 45 years ago. This should be totally doable.
That doesn't make it impossible. Not even that hard. Are there any decent engineers on this board? Put three detectors in the ice under the goal that can determine the distance between the detector and the center of the puck. Triangulate the location of the puck in space and compare it to the goal plane. Geometry.
All I'm saying is that it's a solvable problem. I'm not an engineer, but I'm sure there are decent engineers that could solve this problem without that much effort. It's 2015. We landed men on the moon 45 years ago. This should be totally doable.
THis is such a mountain out of a molehill situation. If this would have happened to anyone but McDavid and to a team like Dallas it would just get laughed off like "suck it up" rather than "fix everything, your tech sucks NHL."
I'm going to bookmark this **** for when the Oilers get the benefit of the doubt later this season.
So 10 times in 1230 regular season games or .081% of the games have an issue with something being inconclusive.Murphy explained that the NHL has roughly 10 cases each season where a replay deemed inconclusive falls back on the initial ruling from the referee.
Here's how often anything like this even happens.
http://www.thescore.com/nhl/news/864607?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
So 10 times in 1230 regular season games or .081% of the games have an issue with something being inconclusive.
That's not enough to invest a ton of money into a solution. It's well within the "margin of error" I'm sure the NHL has for officiating.
I said on the main board that is getting it right more than just most of the time. Any system they came up with would likely have at least that amount of error. Since nothing is perfect.
Oilers already have McJesus, they should be freakin happy they lost cuz they're getting Matthews this year too. Hope Oilers suck forever.
Yes you're right. I forgot that Pythagoras is a dick. If the center of the puck is 1.59 inches past the goal line, then the entire puck must be past the goal line. All the same, totally doable.
That doesn't make it impossible. Not even that hard. Are there any decent engineers on this board? Put three detectors in the ice under the goal that can determine the distance between the detector and the center of the puck. Triangulate the location of the puck in space and compare it to the goal plane. Geometry.
All I'm saying is that it's a solvable problem. I'm not an engineer, but I'm sure there are decent engineers that could solve this problem without that much effort. It's 2015. We landed men on the moon 45 years ago. This should be totally doable.
If I were an Oiler fan I would be as giddy as a pig in ****. The chemistry between Yakapov and McDavid will allow Eberle Hall and RNH to stay together. Once Nurse and some of their other young D develop more this team will be scary.
I hope they never get a goalie....seems like it maybe the last spot they need to solidify (assuming Talbot doesn't work out as it is too soon to tell)
Where are the sensors placed, what kind of sensor, and what sensitivity/accuracy can be expected from them?
Placed at the goal line... How is height determined? The sensors will only really be reading distance, so when your 1.59 inches away.... How do we determine what height the puck was at, and if it was 1.59 inches directly above vs on the ice 1.59inches back...
If you use sensors in the posts... You have nearly 2 feet to the puck in the middle of the goal, meaning the distance you read looses accuracy REAL quick. 2 feet over and 1.59 inches back gives a sensor reading of 24.05 inches back, meaning you need to read within 50 thousandths of an inch to do this, about the thickness of 12 human hairs.
Don't just say "its totally doable"
Explain how you would do it... Because the guys that do do it, don't seem to think its that doable, given that it isn't being done.
Even if doable, the main boards would still explode cause it's the kings so it would be the one case where the sensor malfunctioned bringing out all the conspiracy theories all over again.
Even if doable, the main boards would still explode cause it's the kings so it would be the one case where the sensor malfunctioned bringing out all the conspiracy theories all over again.
Even if doable, the main boards would still explode cause it's the kings so it would be the one case where the sensor malfunctioned bringing out all the conspiracy theories all over again.
Kinda crazy to think--as per insider article today--that McBain flew straight into the lineup very last minute and played w/Ehrhoff without even practicing with him. They've performed very well considering.
They had a private plane waiting for him, just hopped on, got to SJ, then laced them up. Love having the AHL so close.
LOL that was great. It's hilarious that they're just trying to find any way to get on Doughty for that. Yeah, Drew. Win something before celebrating like that. Kid never has accomplished anything /s. The best part is they'll be worshipping the ground he walks on when he dons the Team Canada colors in the next Olympics.