Herby
How could Blake have known?
This board seems far different from what I see on Twitter. Hoven's stuff completely crafts the narrative for a large part of the fanbase, a portion of the fanbase I assume wasn't online bitching about the Kings in the 90s or even the 00's.
This isn't new though. Lombardi used Hammond. Cammalleri was basically character assassinated on there. The part about that--and even Rosen--was that there was still some semblance of journalistic integrity and some independence, highlighted most famously by the Williams/O'Sullivan trade "fiasco".
Now? LAKI is worthless and bloggers (i.e. super fans grateful for access), are now your "news" source. It's just a pulpit for Management and nobody dares bite the hand that feeds.
I have to admit, I am pretty shocked how the "We always had him pegged as a 5-7 year project" lie about QB has been so accepted within the Kings fan community. I mean, you expect it from someone like Hoven who can't be critical of anything because doing so is a risk to his access to the team. But this has become one of these situations where if you just repeat a lie over and over again that it becomes reality. There was zero talk about QB taking this long to develop (not being a C entering year 4, really!!??). You can go back and check posts here or elsewhere, or comments on Twitter and there was nothing about a development plan that long, and for good reason, no team in their right mind is taking 5-7 years to develop a #2 overall pick, it's complete insanity that anyone would think that, but here we are in the summer of 2023 and that is accepted by many within this community.
And these guys will eventually admit mistakes (kind of), but it's years down the road (see Hickey and Teubert), where they come up with reasons the picks failed, instead of just saying, we made terrible evaluations on players.
I'm sure in 2032 when Mark Yannetti is entering his 26th season with the team he will go on Hoven or Jessie's show and tell everyone how "we just fell in love with his compete level and blinded us to some red flags we should have seen from a Top 5 pick" or on the other one will say "we were unicorn hunting instead of just going for the best player to help us compete with Kopi, did him being German vs our pick being Canadian have an impact too, I'd hate to think that, but maybe in a way it did". He always has some long winded response instead of just saying "Our evaluation sucked, it happens sometimes" or "we chose the wrong guy between the two we were debating"
Like someone else said in an earlier reply, this isn't a casual fanbase, most Kings fans are dedicated and follow the team closely, don't BS us with excuses and lies, just be honest. If Yannetti just said, "hey, with a pick that high you are certainly expecting more instant results than we have seen, we still believe in the player and his upside but it's been a slower process than we expected" . I won't speak for everyone else, but to me that is more honorable and fair than going on and making excuses and creating false narratives.
The stuff about "we've always been a slow cook team" is just flat out lying to a fanbase that should see right through it.
Last edited: