AbsentMojo
F-ing get up and hunt! Cmon Todd!
those 2 yes, 34, 55 noWe have way too many forwards now. 15 on roster once Moore is back. Who gets sent down? And would they have to go through waivers now?
Grundstrom? JAD?
those 2 yes, 34, 55 noWe have way too many forwards now. 15 on roster once Moore is back. Who gets sent down? And would they have to go through waivers now?
Grundstrom? JAD?
We have way too many forwards now. 15 on roster once Moore is back. Who gets sent down? And would they have to go through waivers now?
Grundstrom? JAD?
It's looking like it.His plan can't possibly be to send Kupari down and roll with MacEwen?
That would be a mistake. Kupari is really valuable on the PK and generally on the 4th line...I think they spot start MacEwen here and thereHis plan can't possibly be to send Kupari down and roll with MacEwen?
I gotta agree with this. Maybe Blake wanted to keep his options open for a trade that never materialized. I think he's also getting a head start on next season when we see some bigger contracts kick in, while still needing to sign Vilardi.I dont get this mindset....Kings are at the top of the pacific and addressed their 3 biggest weakness with a too 4 LHD, NHL Caliber Goalie and a Big Tough 4th Liner with Grit. They already have a great balance of forwards- why the pessimism?
These moves are get past the 1st round moves in my view. I wouldnt be surprised if they were encouraged by Luc/AEG to show progress and get some playoff $$. In terms of clearing all the cap space for this year - i think he was trying to do one more move and it didnt happen. No money was saved against future season's cap with the JQ/Lemieux trades.If this is all Blake did after wasting draft capital, this team isn't getting out of the first round. Waste of cap and assets. And I an not a Blake hater but this is a failure if they wanted to get to the second round.
Byfield and Kupari can be sent down without needing waivers.We have way too many forwards now. 15 on roster once Moore is back. Who gets sent down? And would they have to go through waivers now?
Grundstrom? JAD?
he didnt help next seaons cap at all. Edit: maybe miniscule by moving WagnerI gotta agree with this. Maybe Blake wanted to keep his options open for a trade that never materialized. I think he's also getting a head start on next season when we see some bigger contracts kick in, while still needing to sign Vilardi.
To me it does, we needed a better goalie too. Maybe I'm cold hearted? It makes no difference to me if quick only played for LA or not. I'm a fan of the team winning, first.As of right now, traded a 1st + 3rd for 2 rentals and moved out Quick to shed some salary but didn't actually use that salary to bring anyone else in. Do I have that right?
At least with Chychrun he had term and fit in the age bracket with to grow and win with the team. Blake proclaimed all season that rentals at this junction was the wrong approach.
Does that justify trading quick with a month left in the season rather than not resigning him in the off-season?
From the CBAByfield and Kupari can be sent down without needing waivers.
Then they can be called back up after the deadline and the roster expands.
However, teams only have 5 callups, after the deadline; assuming Byfield, Kupari, and Bjornfot are eventually called back up, that leaves them with only 2 left for the rest of the season in case of injury.
if either gets waived before Grundstrom this team is more concerned with lossing guys than winningthose 2 yes, 34, 55 no
Turcotte is gone at the draft is my prediction. There's smoke with teams apparently showing interest and recouping a pick in this draft makes sense from an asset mgmt perspective, even though we probably won't get great value.Would’ve liked to see a condensing of some of these prospects into a better player, some 2 for 1 kind of deals. Otherwise these kids are going to have to be dealt at the draft. We just don’t have room for everyone and I hate letting assets go for nothing.
So is that it? We traded Quick so we could…add MacEwen?
To me it does, we needed a better goalie too. Maybe I'm cold hearted? It makes no difference to me if quick only played for LA or not. I'm a fan of the team winning, first.
Byfield won’t hit his I can tell you hahaDid not take into consideration any performance bonuses that might hit this season.
Per Cap Friendly
Byfield can receive up to $2,650,000
Kupari $350,000
Kaliyev $150,000
Edler $750,000
Not saying that they will hit them (whatever they may be) but that could be a reason why there was cap space so it did not carryover into next season.
FYI - There was a $637,500 carryover from last season.
he would have taken up a roster spotWe def. needed a goalie but I would have preferred a Korpisalo trade with an extension. But my point is if the extra salary cap was needed to dump Quick but not used, why trade him in the first place? A roster spot?
I am fine with dealing him if there is a package on the table, but I doubt they move him for a low return on his own over just letting him continue to develop and see what they have. I mean, what is the purpose of dealing him for a 3rd or bottom 6 roster player, etc? He still has middle 6 skill and talent and while is situation is different than say Vilardi's he is still quite young and if he can stay healthy for a stretch could prove to be useful. I just don't see them dealing him for a low-end deal just to get rid of him. There has to be a definite upside to the deal that is making the team better than just retaining value.Turcotte is gone at the draft is my prediction. There's smoke with teams apparently showing interest and recouping a pick in this draft makes sense from an asset mgmt perspective, even though we probably won't get great value.
Yeah - I mean very little, but sometimes every little bit helps.he didnt help next seaons cap at all. Edit: maybe miniscule by moving Wagner
Turcotte is gone at the draft is my prediction. There's smoke with teams apparently showing interest and recouping a pick in this draft makes sense from an asset mgmt perspective, even though we probably won't get great value.