unicornpig
Registered User
- Dec 8, 2017
- 3,758
- 5,497
No, but Chicago would be dumb to do that dealTurcotte + Kupari + Peterson (50%) retained for Chicago's first.
Are the Kings giving up too much for a chance at Bedard?
No, but Chicago would be dumb to do that dealTurcotte + Kupari + Peterson (50%) retained for Chicago's first.
Are the Kings giving up too much for a chance at Bedard?
I understand and agree it's a driving force... but despite Bjornfot's shortcomings, that's still a lot of futures from a position of weakness to upgrade that weakness, and still to have too many RHD.Well youre replacing the kings only lhd prospect for a young proven lhd. Blake is probably higher on durzi and Spence than bjornfot which he should be. They package is much better than ottawas 1st and 2 seconds, unless ottawas first is a lottery.
I'll be pissed if JAD is traded for a pick.I'm expecting Grundstrom or JAD moved for a pick. There is no way Blake has made all these moves and and then Kupari down.
April 6 in VegasKings play vegas anytime in the future lol
Turcotte + Kupari + Peterson (50%) retained for Chicago's first.
Are the Kings giving up too much for a chance at Bedard?
edit: add King's first.
it takes two to tango my dude...How was Blake not able to get rid of a couple RHD? Kulikov went for a 3rd. We seriously don’t have offers? Pick up the phone
Oh there’s a lot of partners this time around. And he should be offloading dmen just to do it. There’s so much redundancy.it takes two to tango my dude...
he wont offload someone just to do it