And you act as though it's common, and that context never makes it into the equation.
Yes, trading a 30+ year old with a NMC and multiple years at a $10m hit was and is unrealistic. I will die on that hill, because you can't show me otherwise. You can show a much younger big money guy being traded(not many though). You can show an even older player with a couple years left being dealt(not many though). What you can't show is a guy in Kopitar's situation being dealt.
It's also factually incorrect, and you can see the numbers, that the Islanders traded for an $8.5m player mid-season. That did not happen. That is not a nitpick. That is a basic hard fact of the case. In no way are either the Islanders or Canucks currently working under an $8.5m contractual obligation to Bo Horvat 50+ games into the 22-23 NHL season. You cant get that wrong, and think you get a W.
Whether the Islanders added Horvat's AAV mid-season or offseason is not the point. Do you really not comprehend that?
This is why I constantly call you out for being a troll. You demand hyper specificity when you know it's unreasonable or unfalsifiable, and the argument doesn't call for specificity at all. It's straight out of the Jordan Peterson school of debate, and it's obnoxious, bad faith rhetoric.
No one is going to be able to point to a player like Kopitar being traded because there's only one Kopitar. Moreover, no one disputes the claim that large AAV players being moved is rare. It is rare. But it DOES happen. Your insistence that it doesn't, and it could've never happened, is why this argument continues.
Jack Eichel. $10 million AAV. Traded mid-contract.
OEL. $8.25 million AAV. NMC. Traded mid-contract.
PK Subban. $9 million AAV. NMC. Traded mid-contract.
Ryan O'Reilley. $7.5 million AAV. Traded mid-contract.
Shea Weber. $7.8 million AAV. Traded mid-contract.
Need I go on? I didn't even include all the players who were traded and immediately extended for high AAVs, or players added via free agency with high AAVs, because surely you'll pretend those don't count.
It is absolutely reasonable to believe that if Anze Kopitar were made available sometime between 2016-2019, he could have been traded. Would the Kings need to retain? Possibly. Would they have received a lucrative return? Potentially.
I can't argue the specifics with you because this trade never happened. Your insistence that it couldn't have happened under any circumstance is what myself and others are disputing.