AcerComputer
Registered User
- Aug 4, 2014
- 5,462
- 4,050
Larkin for EP40
Take Laferriere & Clarke out & you have a deal!Ep doesn't seem to have that high of value and trading within the division could be a mistake. None the less. LA could give up:
Lafferirere, Turcotte, Clark and a 2nd
There's a huge deman for a 2C. Canucks dont need to drum up a market. They basically just have to piggy back from whoever loses the Larkin sweepstakes.
And they have to re-sign Clarke before anything else. He’s looking at around $8M. Doesn’t look good for Petterson to the Kings.FWIW, I don’t think the Kings have ample cap space. It’s true Kopi’s 7 Mil came off the books, but now they have Kempe at 11, bread at 11, and Doughty at 11![]()
Why would they though?Ep doesn't seem to have that high of value and trading within the division could be a mistake. None the less. LA could give up:
Lafferirere, Turcotte, Clark and a 2nd
Which is a good thing.And they have to re-sign Clarke before anything else. He’s looking at around $8M. Doesn’t look good for Petterson to the Kings.
EP40 isn't getting traded until either the Canucks become willing to retain on him/take a pretty bad contract back, or he regains his old form.
Canucks honestly don't have any urgency to move him either, so I'd imagine they just wait on him and hope he bounces back.
And I don't think they want to do that either, if he plays well you get a lot for him if you're the Canucks. If he doesn't play well you're in the same situation you are now with one less year on the contract.For a team whose Top 6 Centers are about to be Copp and Kasper, with $40M in cap space, they can probably get rid of him at full contract...
... Just not for much of any value back.
How many 2C's make $11.6m?
Oilers should trade nurse for Gavrikov.I think LA trades for Gavrikov and they don't have the money to also trade for Pettersson.
Pettersson to Detroit after a Larkin trade makes sense but I have a feeling he wouldn't allow a trade there. Detroit just seems like it's in a mess of a situation and I'm not sure any player with a full NTC would particularly want to waive their NTC to go there.
And I don't think they want to do that either, if he plays well you get a lot for him if you're the Canucks. If he doesn't play well you're in the same situation you are now with one less year on the contract.
There's no urgency to move him either because iirc he's happy there (god knows why). Canucks are also barely above the cap floor, so they need the salary anyways. Especially if there's other guys they want to move with big contracts.
One of those is unlike the otherOilers should trade nurse for Gavrikov.
What are the chances that Pettersson elevates his play significantly from where he's at with Vancouver being the same, at best, or arguably worse if they tear things down further?
It doesn't really matter what the chances are.What are the chances that Pettersson elevates his play significantly from where he's at with Vancouver being the same, at best, or arguably worse if they tear things down further?
- EP40 generating alot of buzz around the league
- Canucks are not willing to retain
- Kings and Red Wings have shown strong interest recently and previously
Red Wings would be an interesting trade partner. They can replace Larkin with EP40. They also have assets that the Canucks would be interested.
LA Kings are not flushed with prospects but they do have high draft picks. Canucks also just hired Richard Seeley who was running the King's farm team in the AHL so Seeley will have alot of knowledge in regards to prospects.
Proposal:
To Det
Ep40
To Van
Michael Brandsegg Nygardd
conditional 2nd round pick ( Becomes a 1st if Pettersson scores over 60 points and Detroit makes playoffs)
4th round pick
To LA Kings
Ep40
To Van
2027 1st round pick top 12 protected
2028 Conditional 2nd round pick ( Becomes 1st if Petterson scores over 60 points and LA makes the playoffs)
4th round pick