Mackinnon is a Stanley Cup winner because of Makar, not because he carried them. How many more points did Makar score than him as a d-man?
If Rielly turned into Makar and the Leafs win with Matthews being 3rd on the team in scoring - is he now a better player?
This is nonsense. You're doing everything in your power to reduce MacKinnon to build up Matthews because he has 1 playoff win in 7 years.
During the Cup run, MacKinnon scored 24 points in 20 GP. That's still 1.2 PPG. Yes, Makar played out of his mind, but MacKinnon still delivered at a
high level. And, of course you're also not considering that Kadri missed games and MacKinnon was the only high-end centerman the opposition had to focus on. If you are calling a player who scored 1.2 PPG during a Cup run in an all-important 1C role a
"passenger" I cannot take you seriously tbh.
Are we going to somehow penalize MacKinnon because he has Makar, Rantanen, and Landeskog on his team? Yet, pretend Matthews hasn't been blessed with a star-studded cast in Marner, Tavares, Nylander, and Rielly? Really? Let's not make it sound like Matthews is 1986 Mario Lemieux who is stuck trying to carry his team all by himself.
Matthews career PPG in the playoffs is 0.88. This is a fact. He's also been surrounded by elite talent over the years and a future HHOF coach. Also a fact. And, other than Crosby with Malkin, I can't think of another recent champion 1C who actually had a 2C like Tavares to help shoulder the burden up the middle. Toews? Nope. Kopitar? Nope. Backstrom? I guess with Kuznetsov. Heck, last year Matthews had Tavares
and a Conn Smythe winner in ROR to share duties up the middle. And, unlike Crosby who has often had to carry his line, Matthews always has an elite winger by his side. Honestly, there's
zero excuses for Matthews' shortcomings in the playoffs... other than he's just come up rather small. Period.
Trying to diminish Nate MacKinnon in order to prop Matthews is an awful look.