drktmplr12
Registered User
an absurd way to define leadership, suggested by youNeither? Leadership is taking league min.
Barkov has also won 0 cups.
So has Tkachuk.
Their leadership is not working.
an absurd way to define leadership, suggested by youNeither? Leadership is taking league min.
Barkov has also won 0 cups.
So has Tkachuk.
Their leadership is not working.
Good fit for the Bruins. They'll have room next year and can give Matthews 13.5x3. Good stopgap to give Sweeney time to figure out how to develop a C while still having a contending roster. Matthews can then get his big bag in Vegas, LA, wherever he wants to end up when he still is in prime.
Signing Tavares is the root cause. Because he almost immediately became the teams #2C when Matthews emerged. And he obviously was not going to take less than Tavares because he was the better player (or at least was going to be very soon). And then Marner could also make the claim for double digits because he had actually outperformed Matthews in terms of stats.Nah man. The root to all of Toronto's cap problems is Kyle Dubas (ie the guy who agreed to pay the contracts)
You justify it by him being on the team instead of walking away in free agency or getting a fraction of the value in a trade.You’re getting 5 more years with Mackinnon and he got paid $1 million less then what Matthews wants. How do rationalize giving Matthews that kind of contract? It’s just a selfish ask.
They should’ve figured that out before they got in a situation where the ultimatum was keeping him and crippling their team or trading him and figuring out a plan without him while he had more then rental value.You justify it by him being on the team instead of walking away in free agency or getting a fraction of the value in a trade.
6.962 almost 7................but I do agree he was the most reasonable, and earned his pay accordingly.Meh, at 6.7, Nylander was at the highest end of "fairly paid" imo. Agree that he was undertermed.
So why does nobody clown on Tkachuk and Barkov for being playoff failures with no heart like everybody does for AM and Mitchy boy
We all knew this would happen last year, as we headed to this scenario.......stupid on their part, and now a brand new GM has to deal with it.They should’ve figured that out before they got in a situation where the ultimatum was keeping him and crippling their team or trading him and figuring out a plan without him while he had more then rental value.
Had Lou signed Tavares to that deal, there's no way he could've justified not giving Matthews and Marner something close to what they got. Maybe you can shave off a few hundred k. But the standard was set when Tavares signed.6.962 almost 7................but I do agree he was the most reasonable, and earned his pay accordingly.
Leafs got messed over by Dubas getting played by the player agents.......no way does Lou Lam cave if he had still been there.
No. You don’t look at the $ value as the measuring stick, you look at the cap hit %.
Could be................maybe Lou doesn't sign Tavares and keeps his build in house?Had Lou signed Tavares to that deal, there's no way he could've justified not giving Matthews and Marner something close to what they got. Maybe you can shave off a few hundred k. But the standard was set when Tavares signed.
I think it would be foolish to think signing Tavares was a choice for whoever was the GM. Pretty sure that came from the top, and by this I mean even above Shanahan. The way Tavares was hyped up by the media it was obvious they wanted him badly. And have obviously made him the captain since.Could be................maybe Lou doesn't sign Tavares and keeps his build in house?
There are a few scenarios......all moot now.
And 13.5 is just over 15% of the cap at 87.5 which is about right for a rocket/hart winner in a high tax market
The term is brutal though
13.5 x 3 is nuts. I don’t see why he would do that. The term is so small that squeezing 1.5-2.5 million over 3 years isn’t worth the headache when you have 65 in the bank.
Personally I would prefer 5 years to 8
He isn’t healthy. Or incredibly fast. I have no idea how well he will age at 32.
Most people wish Tavares only had 5 years. I wonder what’s the best move.
Matthews from 27-31 is probably his best years. Might cut bait at 32.
I think you answered your own question with your obsession
Signing Tavares is the root cause. Because he almost immediately became the teams #2C when Matthews emerged. And he obviously was not going to take less than Tavares because he was the better player (or at least was going to be very soon). And then Marner could also make the claim for double digits because he had actually outperformed Matthews in terms of stats.
If you fellas think Lou could've gotten Matthews and Marner signed to 8 year deals on single digits, lol. Doesn't really matter who the GM was, because signing Tavares probably came from above the GM as well.
Probably 14.5 - 15 for 7 years as a UFA.let say he does not extend and goes to UFA next summer what do you think he gets? probably 13-14 range probably.
Hilarious.................this is how GM's get fired.Probably 14.5 - 15 for 7 years as a UFA.
Its a different team. Bruins would plug him next to Pasta and have McAvoy, Lindholm, Carlo, Ullmark/Swayman defense behind him.If the Leafs apparently can’t put together a winning team around Matthews at $13.5m, what makes anyone think another team can?
I don’t understand how these two thoughts can be reconciled by simply changing the logo on the jersey
Ullmark has been fantastic in the playoffs. What’s not to like there lolIts a different team. Bruins would plug him next to Pasta and have McAvoy, Lindholm, Carlo, Ullmark/Swayman defense behind him.
14.5M is 15.7% in year 2 of a 7 year deal.Hilarious.................this is how GM's get fired.
Nick Kypreos kind of thinking there I would say....
3) To your point about Lou, Lou is not only cheap, he generally builds his team from the net out. Look at what he did in Jersey and what he's doing now with NYI. He also does not care at all. Meaning if mgmt told Lou to sign Tavares, Lou probably would've told then to go to hell and then used the cap to sign guys like Spencer Knight, Chris Tanev, Adam Pelech. Probably not those exact players but you get the idea. If Lou were in charge of the team, there's no way he would've prioritized signing JT over a proper 1D and / or starting goalie. Those pajama boy memes never would've happened. He's also a good negotiator and he would've got AM34 and MM either at the full 8 year term, at a lower cap hit, or both. See how Yzerman got exactly what he wanted with Debrincat, Lou's a better negotiator than Stevie Y.
***
But the Leafs had Matthews, plus their other young core to lock up. Tavares was the ultimate overpriced luxury item for the Leafs and they splurged instead of giving him a "take it or leave it" offer of 9.5 per to come home to Toronto. The following summer, Kucherov wins the Hart and scores 126 points and signs for 9.5 x 8. The Leafs have been a clown show with contracts ever since Tavares. But continuing down the same losing path is insanity. It's time to start challenging these players to see how much they value the Leafs vs. the paycheck.People thought JT could be a 90-100 pt elite 1C who would be as good as Matthews
You do realize there's a hard cap in the NHL, yes? If there wasn't, MLSE would overpay for every hot free agent and our payroll would be 120 million a year.Yes let's hate athletes because the owners are all cheap as hell.