Wendelstache
Registered User
- May 5, 2010
- 9,897
- 3,834
Holl is certainly an NHL defenceman.
agree, a 7th defenseman on a good team.
Holl is certainly an NHL defenceman.
Is Kevin Connauton an NHL defenceman?agree, a 7th defenseman on a good team.
People are equally sick of talking about Matthews, Marner, Tavares and Nylanders contracts.It’s more to illustrate how valuable 1.25 million in cap space is and picking the right guy is.
Kerfoot has been playing wing and McCaan is a better winger.
Hyman is in another stratosphere compared to Ritchie.
Holl regressing is hindsight. Bogosian is more physical and overall probably an equal #6.
To make all those judgement calls and correct decisions is another story. I’m just sick of people defending the Matthews/Marner over payments because an extra 1.25 million let’s you keep Hyman, McCaan in this scenario. Not saying they would have made all those decisions and been successful, obviously.
Dermott for Mikey DiPietro + 5th
Holl for Nick Paul
Dermott for Sam Steel
Dermott/Holl for a 2nd
Dermott/Holl for Arturri Lehtonen
Dermott + x for Phil Kessel @ 50% retention
Dermott + Woll for Connor Ingram + Ben Harpur + 4th
He earned that contract. He was fine last year, if not good for most of the year. Not sure what you expect to pay mid/bottom pairing defenseman that play high defensive minutes like Holl. I don't think anyone expected him to regress to this level of struggling.
I'm fine admitting I was wrong about Holl though. Opinions can change based on new information. In hindsight, should have probably let Seattle take him if they were interested in doing so.
Things that are the "right move" don't need asterisks next to them.. right moves don't require disclaimers.
It was wrong to keep Holl (-7 in 7GP and yes I get how +/- is not the greatest stat but it is directionally a proxy stat for quality of play) over McCann (3G,4A in 8GP), it was wrong to keep Kerfoot past the day after our season ended last year.
I think holl problem is he’s playing like a offensive d if he went back to how he was playing before defence he would be fine
Pretty much what I was saying lol keep it simpleMy problem with Holl is when he's feeling himself he starts freewheeling like he's Alex Pietrangelo and getting deep in the offensive zone. He's at his best playing a quiet Ron Hainsey game and just using his mobility and length to disrupt, regain puck control and onto Muzzin or the easy out.
I don't understand why people seem to think 6 or 7 poor games suddenly erases achievements over an entire season prior.
Holl HAS looked Poorly this season, but he's also clearly capable of being better than this based on what we've seen with our eyes and on the stays sheet in the past.
He's decent in the right situation, how many teams have a Muzzin to carry a partner and pair?
I don't understand why people seem to think 6 or 7 poor games suddenly erases achievements over an entire season prior.
Holl HAS looked Poorly this season, but he's also clearly capable of being better than this based on what we've seen with our eyes and on the stats sheet in the past.
3 thingsIt’s more to illustrate how valuable 1.25 million in cap space is and picking the right guy is.
Kerfoot has been playing wing and McCaan is a better winger.
Hyman is in another stratosphere compared to Ritchie.
Holl regressing is hindsight. Bogosian is more physical and overall probably an equal #6.
To make all those judgement calls and correct decisions is another story. I’m just sick of people defending the Matthews/Marner over payments because an extra 1.25 million let’s you keep Hyman, McCaan in this scenario. Not saying they would have made all those decisions and been successful, obviously.
I still think they can get more in trade value now than what was given up in the expansion draft (Hallander + 7th) even if it’s a 2nd or a 3rd plus Hallander was only a second rounder who’s not excelling but not busting, whereas a draft pick is still a lottery ticket everyone envisions cashing in on.He earned that contract. He was fine last year, if not good for most of the year. Not sure what you expect to pay mid/bottom pairing defenseman that play high defensive minutes like Holl. I don't think anyone expected him to regress to this level of struggling.
I'm fine admitting I was wrong about Holl though. Opinions can change based on new information. In hindsight, should have probably let Seattle take him if they were interested in doing so.
In the end, the net loss to the organization was Hallander and a 7th which is less value than Justin Holl. So that is a win.
Steve Dangle was speculating that he'd be traded very soon. Don't know if he has any connections, but I'd assume they want to shed his salary and get someone cheaper to fill that role.
Biega works....Just leave it as it is. Sit Holl until one of Sandin, Dermott, Liljegren start screwing up.
I suspect we will be happy to have both Holl and Dermott when someone gets injured. It will happen.
Get a cheap Physical D pk type at the deadline for depth.
LA can take Holl when they leave town tomorrow night. Just leave Grundstrom.