Doug Prishpreed
Registered User
The death of a guy...who stepped down and will now have more job opportunities than anyone else in the NHL?He actually made a lot of good moves but signing Tavares was the death of him.
The death of a guy...who stepped down and will now have more job opportunities than anyone else in the NHL?He actually made a lot of good moves but signing Tavares was the death of him.
Is there a bag of magic beans we aren't aware of?Leafs might be able to get something done now.
But I was told he was the chosen one? The messiah? Boy wonder.
Toronto gets rid of the wrong guy. Hilarious.
Liked a lot of the moves he made at the deadline? He made only one move - acquiring O'Reilly and Acciari. Acciari's okay, O'Reilly was good, but this still was just one move.
Yes, lost Murray early in the season. Murray, who has had massive injury trouble for years. Could it have been predicted that he might be injury prone? Surfely not.
Self inflictedWasn’t amazing but wasn’t terrible. Did well managing a Toronto team that was heavily pressed against the cap.
Lou might be dead before that horrendous contract he gave Horvat ends. let that sink in.
Tavares was good for toronto until only recently, people seem to forget that
Yup, nailed it.Dubas was not the problem, he literally did everything possible to put a winning team in Toronto.
He built a great organization, losing him is a massive blow, no matter how they spin this.
This firing is 100% because of the players underdelivering
It's very rare to see someone accomplish so little while raking in so much public acclaim.
Whichever team this guy goes to will probably see about the same results as the Leafs while he embarrasses himself by picking fights with opposing fans in the home team's club section.
Huge W for the Leafs today, IMO. Pains me to see it.
That's not the point though. Tavares has been good, I don't think anyone would argue that. The issue always has been, and still is that it was an awful allocation of 11 million dollars.Tavares was good for toronto until only recently, people seem to forget that
I don’t think it’s exactly a bold assumption to take the Leafs at their word. A lot of the noise is emanating from Dubas’ comments but since then no one really considered that the Leafs themselves might not want to keep a GM who didn’t make a ton of progress towards the only goal that matters in five years. Regardless of what you think of Dubas it’s a results driven business and fairly understandable.Nope. The noise recently is that the Leafs' decision makers wanted him back but he's pushed back saying he needs time and space to think about it.
They might have not wanted to risk waiting. And either chose to proceed this way or were told if they need an answer now, it's no.
Too much is unknown to make bold assumptions. But you can certainly have reason to think Dubas' choice might be driving this.
Why on earth would Dubas want to go to Pittsburgh bunch of aging players that all have full NMC no prospects and no goalie.Welcome to Pittsburgh
Nice! He's a good GM, always glad to see the Leafs lose one of those.
Is that confirmed? They could have pulled the offer since he wasn't able to handle Toronto's pressure which wouldn't have been lower next year.The death of a guy...who stepped down and will now have more job opportunities than anyone else in the NHL?
Are you really taking them at their word by characterizing it this way?I don’t think it’s exactly a bold assumption to take the Leafs at their word. A lot of the noise is emanating from Dubas’ comments but since then no one really considered that the Leafs themselves might not want to keep a GM who didn’t make a ton of progress towards the only goal that matters in five years. Regardless of what you think of Dubas it’s a results driven business and fairly understandable.