Confirmed with Link: Kyle Dubas Not Returning

Status
Not open for further replies.

Golden_Jet

Registered User
Sep 21, 2005
26,433
13,718
If we traded them at the beginning of the pandemic, not only would we be trading them in an environment where teams can't easily accommodate and are wary of taking on big contracts, but we'd also not be getting value for their recent breakouts, and any replacements in that cap space (that are supposedly only possible with the loss of those players) are extremely unlikely to make up for the lost and wildly undervalued impact those players bring to the team.

Not sure where you got that idea. Sounds like the idea was considered and recognized as not beneficial to the team.
M Tkachuk was available last summer, maybe there could of been a deal with him involved to change the makeup of the core.
 
  • Like
Reactions: myleafs

Ianturnedbull

Registered User
Jun 11, 2022
6,112
5,560
2021-2022 and 2022-2023 post-deadline were our strongest versions of the team.

Really? Because I remember reports of Dubas looking into options and concluding that the offers weren't there. I think about Nylander specifically - he didn't hold the league-wide trade value at the time that was necessary for it to be worth it. And weren't there also reports that Shanny said they weren't going anywhere this year?

What are you even talking about? Star wars action figures? What? These analogies of yours never fit.
Matthews and Marner are incredibly special, even if they're wildly underappreciated by their own fanbase.
"Wildly underappreciated"? How can you say that? The fans love those 2.
 

hamzarocks

Registered User
Jul 22, 2012
21,663
15,280
Pickering, Ontario
Sorry, why are we comparing our 9th and onward to primarily top 4 D?
Which of the following D are top 4D on a contending team?

Rielly (for sure imo)
Brodie (maybe though ideally a 4D)
Schenn (no he is not a top 4D but good third pairing)
Gio (not an NHLer now)
McCabe (dont think he would be for most teams)
Lilijgren (he was a 6/7 on our team , so would he be higher on other teams)
Holl (i don't think he is a top 4D on poor teams let alone playoffs)

The leafs defense is quite a mess at the moment.

We need to upgrade Brodie into under 30 2-way D who can move the puck and is good defensively (both areas whete Brodie fell hard last 1.5 years)

We need to find a true partner for Rielly as Schenn is a stop gap but not a full time player with him. This player needs to have physicality and a nice heavy shot

Rielly - XXX
XXX (#2D which we don't have)- XXX (brodie upgrade)
McCabe - Lilijgren

That is what our defense should be at the moment.

You can get away with the 2RHD if lilijgren steps up and getting a 3RHD isnt to tough

A #2D who plays the LHD and a good guy to pair with rielly are a must need
 

socko

Registered User
Nov 26, 2013
7,938
6,032
Martinez, GA
That’s really cool! What assets do you spend on a 1C 1D and 1G now that you’re competing given that you have no picks to tank with?
It's just my opinion that it wasn't the worst trade ever. You're free to disagree. I think a trade closer to the one you're trying to make is the Tom Kurvers trade. Kurvers 27 was a decent player but nothing more than that. Giving a pick up in what was known to be the Eric Lindros draft was very ill-advised.
 

Gallagbi

Formerly Eazy_B97
Jul 5, 2005
49,522
12,107
Which of the following D are top 4D on a contending team?
Mo's a #1, Brodie and McCabe are top 4. Then we have a glut of bottom pair guys, especially with Muzz going down (otherwise hed be our top 4).

Im not a believer that your #1 always has to play with your #2, so im fine with a Mo/Schenn pairing next year and spotting in extra minutes with our middle pair when needed.

Really we need another top 4 D or to bulk fill with another borderline top 4 guy, like Lilj. Im also fine to move on from Brodie, but he's easily a top 4
 

Dekes For Days

Registered User
Sep 24, 2018
21,442
16,140
Well even if you're right and Dubas had no choice but to keep the core intact, he did a poor job building around them. However you want to slice it, Dubas was tasked with making the team good enough to compete for a championship and never even got close
He was tasked with making us good enough to compete for a championship, and he did, despite some pretty significant obstacles. We've been one of the best teams in the league for years. Nobody is perfect, but he did a good job building around the core and gave this team multiple really good shots.
M Tkachuk was available last summer, maybe there could of been a deal with him involved to change the makeup of the core.
Tkachuk wanted to go to the U.S.
 

Apex Predator

Registered User
Jun 21, 2019
4,293
4,463
He was tasked with making us good enough to compete for a championship, and he did, despite some pretty significant obstacles. We've been one of the best teams in the league for years. Nobody is perfect, but he did a good job building around the core and gave this team multiple really good shots.

Tkachuk wanted to go to the U.S.
I agree with dekes he wanted to go to the states and wouldn’t signing long term here.
 

hamzarocks

Registered User
Jul 22, 2012
21,663
15,280
Pickering, Ontario
Mo's a #1, Brodie and McCabe are top 4. Then we have a glut of bottom pair guys, especially with Muzz going down (otherwise hed be our top 4).

Im not a believer that your #1 always has to play with your #2, so im fine with a Mo/Schenn pairing next year and spotting in extra minutes with our middle pair when needed.

Really we need another top 4 D or to bulk fill with another borderline top 4 guy, like Lilj. Im also fine to move on from Brodie, but he's easily a top 4
What makes you feel McCabe is a top4D

He has little offensive game, struggled against flordia and hasnt had a history of playing tough top 4 mins vs hard assignments

Muzzin was decling hard when he was playing.

Leafs need to be proactive and fix the declining defense core

Brodie was borderline unplayable in the offensive zone this year and made too many bone headed and flat footed plays

We need to upgrade brodie and drop McCabe to 3rd pairing if we want a defense core which is strong enough to win in the playoffs.
 

Gallagbi

Formerly Eazy_B97
Jul 5, 2005
49,522
12,107
What makes you feel McCabe is a top4D

He has little offensive game, struggled against flordia and hasnt had a history of playing tough top 4 mins vs hard assignments

Muzzin was decling hard when he was playing.

Leafs need to be proactive and fix the declining defense core

Brodie was borderline unplayable in the offensive zone this year and made too many bone headed and flat footed plays

We need to upgrade brodie and drop McCabe to 3rd pairing if we want a defense core which is strong enough to win in the playoffs.
Simple answer is how he plays hockey in relation to the rest of the league. No point debating further, we wont agree.
 

Buds17

Registered User
Nov 29, 2015
8,573
3,588
Burke often gets dinged for the Kessel trade, but I would make that trade today all over again. A 22 year old stud like Kessel for two firsts and a 2nd round pick. I mean that worked out about as good as it possibly could for Boston, but that wasn't a great trade on their behalf. Just plain luck for them.
The trade didn't make much sense for the Leafs because they weren't a playoff team prior to that move occurring. I also doubt Boston makes that deal with Toronto if they feel that the Leafs were going to end up being a playoff team as that likely would've diminished the quality of the pick(s).
 
Last edited:

Antropovsky

Registered User
Jun 2, 2007
15,495
7,263
M Tkachuk was available last summer, maybe there could of been a deal with him involved to change the makeup of the core.
I said we should trade Marner for Tkachuk at the time he was holding out with Calgary, @Dekes For Days and a few other well known Marner defenders said "lol Marner is way better" or something very close to that effect.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Golden_Jet

hockeywiz542

Registered User
May 26, 2008
16,225
5,292
I've seen zero evidence he was willing to come here. He wanted to be in the U.S.


Did The Maple Leafs Reject A Matthew Tkachuk For Mitch Marner Deal Last Summer? | SDP

sdpn

May 19, 2023

Steve, Jesse and Adam are joined by Chris Johnston to discuss the Leafs stars and the possibility of trading them
and whether or not Toronto actually rejected a Marner for Tkachuk trade last summer.
 

Kaladin

Registered User
Nov 5, 2017
787
1,113
If Lou stuck around, he probably would have driven this team off a cliff, and we'd be begging to just make the playoffs again.
For a person who prides himself on being "objective" and "facts" oriented you sure do share a ton of opinions. Guess you know for a fact that if Lou had stuck around the Leafs wouldn't have made the playoffs again despite the actual evidence of him taking his next team to the playoffs (after they lost their biggest star no less) multiple times. Much further than the leafs ever managed in his absence. But I apologize, continue to look down on us from your fact-based mountain Mr. Days.
 

Kaladin

Registered User
Nov 5, 2017
787
1,113
Depth chart write ups are never really that useful when you’re not comparing guys like Mete, Kokkonen, Koster, Kral and Niemela to the kind of opposition you’re likely to play against deeper into the playoffs.

Just try to visualize how each of those prospects will compete vs real final four defense corps with names like Pietrangelo, Theodore, Hague, Whitecloud, Slavin, Pesce, Ekblad, Montour, Skeji, Burns, Heiskanen.
This is what I don't get. No one can objectively look at the Leaf's D group and compare it to the other contenders and think it's perfectly "fine" as I've heard some say on here. It's sorely lacking.
 

Racer88

Registered User
Sep 29, 2020
12,196
12,188
For a person who prides himself on being "objective" and "facts" oriented you sure do share a ton of opinions. Guess you know for a fact that if Lou had stuck around the Leafs wouldn't have made the playoffs again despite the actual evidence of him taking his next team to the playoffs (after they lost their biggest star no less) multiple times. Much further than the leafs ever managed in his absence. But I apologize, continue to look down on us from your fact-based mountain Mr. Days.
Hey you’re arguing with real facts that’s not fair. Lol
 

Dreakmur

Registered User
Mar 25, 2008
19,232
7,656
Orillia, Ontario
Yes, I'm sure it's a coincidence that the Leafs just happen to get the exact same results against these goalies as the other teams that play them on their run to the cup finals. It couldn't possibly be that the goalies we've faced are among the best goalies in the world, with awards piling a mile high, and proven potential to hit peaks like this, going through undeniably dominant stretches by every metric and eye test. Surely we saw success against Vasilevsky this year and decided no more of that and stopped working. Boston and Carolina, the top two teams in the league this year, also clearly don't like working.

It’s unfortunate that Toronto wasn’t allowed to get a good goalie of their own…
 

Gallagbi

Formerly Eazy_B97
Jul 5, 2005
49,522
12,107
This is what I don't get. No one can objectively look at the Leaf's D group and compare it to the other contenders and think it's perfectly "fine" as I've heard some say on here. It's sorely lacking.
Honestly were watching a Panthers team play Stall as a top 4 D. Forsling is also prone to his own issues and they play him as a top 2. I like Dallas, and have been a Suter fan for ages, but they ride their top pair hard to compensate their depth.

Too many people look at their own team and mistakes in isolation. They also tend to look at the result of the error rather than the occurence.

I dont love our D and would make changes based on my own preferences, but its competetive with 2 of the 3 teams left. I do think VGK has the strongest D left, which is a tier above.
 
  • Like
Reactions: andora and ACC1224

Dreakmur

Registered User
Mar 25, 2008
19,232
7,656
Orillia, Ontario
This is what I don't get. No one can objectively look at the Leaf's D group and compare it to the other contenders and think it's perfectly "fine" as I've heard some say on here. It's sorely lacking.

First form the opinion that Dubas is infallible, then argue to support that opinion. That’s how people can think our blueline has been anything by mediocre.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rumman and Kaladin
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad