That's how Derren Dreger does it. He always says both sides..."It could be A or could be B....we are not sure yet....too cloudy to tell"....then when B is the answer...he quickly says " I told you it was B"....its all so tiresome.
If lovin' Dubas was wrong, they don't wanna be right...
You the 1 who said he didn't care...of course he dies. He is glitz without guts. He needs to care and grow a pair.
Never witnessed such emotional attachment to a corporate suit. Probably the most bizarre thing I've ever seen on this forum.
Maybe it really is possible that Dubas was the root cause of the country club atmosphere in Toronto?
He was the Human equivalent of a Tesla to some people.
Please , no logical reasoning beyond this point, only irrational thinking allowed.
Here is a great video for you. Warning: Only logical people should view.
Leafs' Players Uneasy After Kyle Dubas Let Go | Kyper and Bourne
If Matthews re-signing really is contingent upon who he wants as GM then get the f*** out of here. Shit like that is blue and white disease to its core.
Of course he does. I wonder what a poll in this section would say right now. We have to be at at least 99% wanting Keefe fired, right?
Sullivan is such a shit coach
Early 30s guy with a degree from Brock (a university that isnt super prestigous and crazy to get into so more people can relate), who claimed to promote analytics, intelligence, and diversity/inclusiveness
CJ said they felt there was too much pressure for the family to meet Crosby, so they met Letang instead.
I can see Shanahan doing that.
Anyone who thought a hockey lifer like Dubas wouldn't listen to other teams is a sucker.
Case dismissed.What is interesting to me is .. If this were a court of law, that statement would be ruled inadmissible as valid evidence, based a the 3rd party hearsay rule.
What is hearsay evidence?
Objection, Your Honour! Hearsay.” You’ve probably heard it a thousand times in courtroom dramas on TV – the judge then says, “Objection overruled” or “Sustained” and the trial moves on. But do you know what hearsay evidence is, and what it isn’t?
The general rule - All evidence presented in a trial must be “admissible”. The word “admissible” means that the law of evidence will permit the judge to admit it as evidence in the trial and consider it when deciding your case. Hearsay evidence carries with it the risk that the reported statement is not reliable, because it can't be verified, because a 3rd party not directly involved that neither saw, nor heard it first hand themselves has no true account of the situation. Because of the possibility that hearsay evidence is not reliable, this form of evidence is not allowed at trial.
Unless Chris Johnston was on the phone line with Shanny and the players, or in the room when it was said, his opinion outside that scope would be considered conjecture (an opinion or conclusion formed on the basis of incomplete information) and thus Hearsay. Where or what is the factual basis to prove CJ statement as true, or is it simple freedom of speech and his own personal opinion and drawn conclusion on the subject?
If however at and until Shanahan's next PC to announce the Leafs new coach, he personally goes on the record and tells us what he did or didn't say or promise the core 4, everything else said in the media can be believed or not believed at your own risk.
