I'm thinking it would be closer to a book then bullet points.
The strategy Dubas started with, that the Avs decided against, was fundamentally broken. As an outsider, it seemed like this was partly acknowledged early on. We sort of attempted pivots, but mostly it became, work with the mess that was made, and keep throwing stuff at the wall each year hoping we would eventually prevail on sheer talent and a bit of luck. Time ran out and now its a mess. Scrap it entirely.
I'd like the new GM to come in with a blueprint of what the contender team will look like, why it will win, and how we will get there. Every facet of the game will align to the plan - mgmt, coaching, players, culture, style, roles, cap, pairings, etc. It will evolve over time, but not along the lines of hockey basics like 'let's forget about physicality in the playoffs, no wait, lets put some back in.'
The time sensitive upcoming critical moves need to align to that long term plan, and will probably be the most important parts of achieving it, or at least achieving it quickly. Already we're working under strained conditions. Significant options and opportunities will soon dissappear.
I can follow most of this.. i can definitely agree on the alignment piece, it is like when usa college people refer to their sports as programs - i like that notion and i like the creedance behind it. Carolina runs a program in my opinion.
Ideally in a strong alignment pivots should only occur based on your upper players and contracts - not re signing so they are traded, or not re signing and leaving
The two parallel roads in which he built this team have always irked me because it was so distinct - top six bottom six and they looked it on the ice - versus having a collective 12 man unit playing the same way brings those roads together.
I know carolina is going to lose again and again could have used more scoring.. that aside their ability to play effective aggressive hockey with guys like noesen on a top line and martinook as a key 3rd line cog.. etc.
This team is far beyond the chapter headings like physicality or skill etc... it needs to be addressed to the basic theme of everyone do the same shit. Marner cannot keep playing the way he does at our blueline - others have their expectations of chip, get it out, nothing in the middle but others get green lights - that is wrong.
I dont really agree with strained conditions.. personally i see more strained by everyone looking in rather than the top guys involved doimg to work
You move past it pretty quick if youre all in on your job
Is that being reported as fact about the core 4 or is it being speculatedWhat we know is that Dubas was ok with trading a core 4 player. According to Johnston, Shanahan called the core 4 and said they're staying.
If we hire another GM before then and we essentially run it back with the same core, then I feel Dubas' asked for autonomy is justified because Shanahan would've blocked a trade. Which makes us look even more of a clown organization because everyone is generally in agreement that after 7 years with minimal success, the core 4 has to be broken up.
I reserve judgment until July 1st passes.