One of the big disconnects between the "sign Kreider" crowd and the "trade Kreider" crowd seems to be the belief that the Rangers are rebuilt enough to compete for multiple Cups, versus not.
As I had said many times, if it were possible, signing Kreider to this deal after trading him for assets for the rest of the year FIRST would have been way more palatable.
In any case, I'm very interested to see if they decided they can't live without Kreider but are still in asset accumulation mode, or if they are thinking they are gonna line up and compete for a title next year. Because if it's the latter, I couldn't possibly disagree more strongly and I would be terrified they are killing off their true title chances down the line.