River Meadow
Registered User
- Mar 29, 2016
- 7,293
- 9,836
Not one wrist question, and Dach didn't bring it up as it bothering him... I suppose that is... good?
I was shocked that he fell that far....Luneau as wellI can't believe Goyette fell that far, I would have picked him in the top 20, think he's one of the best players I saw in the OHL.
Where did you hear this about Shutt?Yup those were my take always too
Oh! That and the fact that #22 is apparently retired for Shutt.
How can Romanov develop into an elite defender, considering his subpar hockey sense and lack of strenght down low?IMO, even if Romanov's offense doesn't develop, he could still become elite defensively, making his value higher than the 3C floor for Dach.
Romanov is a much better known quantity, has also room to grow, but comes with less risk.
Show name now changed to Dropping the Ball.Just saw this on YouTube.
The guy in the right hand corner is just weird and doesn't need to be there.
I know this is professional amateurish, but they need to edit it so you go from whomever is talking to whomever is talking with the odd shot off all 3. Just seeing that guy look awkward in the top right got more of my focus than the questions
How can Romanov develop into an elite defender, considering his subpar hockey sense and lack of strenght down low?
That man interviewing Kirby is so bad lol.
‘’You’re not stepping in a situation where it’s a team that struggling, this is a team that’s build to win right now’’
Where as he been
PK for Weber ?It's worth pointing out that Bergevin would have never traded Romanov and late picks for Kirby Dach.
It's a moderate-high risk, high reward trade. In contrast Bergevin was extremely conservative in his trades (other than the Sergachev trade).
What a shoddy interviewer John Scott is. Most of the time was spent on dead end questions and empty banter. The idiot thought that the Habs’ AHL franchise was in St-John’s.
From the little that was salvageable, Dach acknowledged that his shot needs work and that he’s been spending a lot of time working on it this summer. And he’s going to wear no. 77. He looked into it and knew that Kulak and Gilbert wore that number as Habs.
What a missed opportunity to delve deeper.
I don't think one can significantly develop certain things. He either has it, or not.Because just like Dach, he's young and has room to grow.
I don't think one can significantly develop certain things. He either has it, or not.
There is hope that it's just a lack of experience in Romanov's case. However, he already had nearly 100 games of professional hockey experience before reaching the NHL. Personally, I'm not oprimistic.
I don't think one can significantly develop certain things. He either has it, or not.
There is hope that it's just a lack of experience in Romanov's case. However, he already had nearly 100 games of professional hockey experience before reaching the NHL. Personally, I'm not oprimistic.
John Scott.............doing an interview, interesting eh..........as you say missed opportunity to look at the kid a little deeper. I think there will be more interviews upcoming for sure, Engels and the gang so to speak.What a shoddy interviewer John Scott is. Most of the time was spent on dead end questions and empty banter. The idiot thought that the Habs’ AHL franchise was in St-John’s.
From the little that was salvageable, Dach acknowledged that his shot needs work and that he’s been spending a lot of time working on it this summer. And he’s going to wear no. 77. He looked into it and knew that Kulak and Gilbert wore that number as Habs.
What a missed opportunity to delve deeper.
At the time, this was 4 quarters for a loonie.............Bergevin and Toe nails just wanted PK gone.PK for Weber ?
It was sarcasm. In that interview, Scott was saying how 22 is up in the rafters or something. Then Dach is like, I think Caufield wears 22.Where did you hear this about Shutt?
It's worth pointing out that Bergevin would have never traded Romanov and late picks for Kirby Dach.
It's a moderate-high risk, high reward trade. In contrast Bergevin was extremely conservative in his trades (other than the Sergachev trade).
I mentioned Sergachev for Drouin, the others are not in the ballpark of Romanov for Dach.That's not true. Bergevin has done a lot of risky 1 for 1 trades
Sergachev for Drouin
Subban for Weber
Galchenyuk for Domi (who was coming off a 9 goal season)
Domi for Anderson (who was coming off a 1 goal season)
Such a dman number. not too many forwards have made that number relevant. I remember Chris Gratton and Anson Carter wearing it and Adam Oates at the end of his career. Pretty sure Josh Anderson was 77 in Colombus as well but would have to do some research to find others.
Only Turgeon, Gilbert and Kulak had it before with the habsSuch a dman number. not too many forwards have made that number relevant. I remember Chris Gratton and Anson Carter wearing it and Adam Oates at the end of his career. Pretty sure Josh Anderson was 77 in Colombus as well but would have to do some research to find others.
How could I forget Turgeon????Only Turgeon, Gilbert and Kulak had it before with the habs
Its lucky number 7, twice
he'll need it lol
He and Koivu were my favorite players during those dark Houle years. He was the last Hab to get 90 points in a season I believe. I still have my Turgeon jersey in fact . I loved watching that guy play for the Habs.How could I forget Turgeon????
My first memory of #77 is Phil Esposito with the Rangers.Such a dman number. not too many forwards have made that number relevant. I remember Chris Gratton and Anson Carter wearing it and Adam Oates at the end of his career. Pretty sure Josh Anderson was 77 in Colombus as well but would have to do some research to find others.
He only had the one calendar year under Houle before being traded to ST.L but it was one of his most productive years.He and Koivu were my favorite players during those dark Houle years. He was the last Hab to get 90 points in a season I believe. I still have my Turgeon jersey in fact . I loved watching that guy play for the Habs.