- Jan 18, 2022
- 9,032
- 13,551
In essence you said that the team had assets left to it. But every team has assets at all times — it’s a bit of a “the sky is blue” kind of statement.Obviously, what is even the point of the sentence in bold? Evidently if we had had a GM with a bit of talent our rebuild or our club would have probably been better (depending on who you hire). But the question was did Bergevin leave us in a good position for a rebuild. I didn't say yes outrightly, because I don't believe he left us in a good position, but when you look at the past certain teams who've started their rebuilds and became contenders were worse off than we were. Honestly, I don't get why you felt the need to write out such a long post when most of the things you bring up are obvious mistakes on Bergevin's part and salient reasons why he was fired. I disagree with none of your points nor does anything you bring up counter my original post. The only thing I wanted to bring up was that Hughes and Gorton at least had something to work with. Could it have been better, well, for sure. He (Bergevin) was a bad GM, and if it would have been better he's probably still there managing the club. How the f*** that was not an objective analysis eludes me, just because he was horrendous at his job doesn't mean there weren't players of value to trade and a potential foundation. There was. I don't even understand why you felt the need to write such a long post. Bergevin didn't leave us with assets thanks to his competence and acumen as a GM; he left us with assets despite his being horrible.
Bergevin received a much better asset value position than he left for his successor.
It will take a long time until Hughes assembles a team that can win playoff rounds.
Last edited: