You just said that calling Dach a perimeter player is “nonsense” then proceeded to say you know more than most fans. You clearly are implying something here. This is who is. He’s a slightly better Lars Eller
Lars Eller has 4 goals already.You just said that calling Dach a perimeter player is “nonsense” then proceeded to say you know more than most fans. You clearly are implying something here. This is who is. He’s a slightly better Lars Eller
Yeah I meant more like what the best version of him will be. Eller rn is probably still a better hockey playerLars Eller has 4 goals already.
Sam Montembeault is currently sitting at .932 and we all know that's unsustainable.You don't think the Canadiens having the second best penalty kill in the league marks a large improvement?
Long term future Kirby I would put at wing. He played his best hockey couple years back with Suzuki and Caufield. Canadiens going to be deep at centerI'm not there yet, I'm fine with giving him the development runway with our prospects before it's time to flip the focus. I have 0 interest in any qualified francophone coach, they'll all bring the Therrien puck in.
It's something that almost exclusively requires experience and repetitions. He hasn't had a long runway of consistently taking draws, night after night, to improve. It will get better, he may never be a plus 50% guy but if he can hover in the high 40s, it's negligible.
Eller always had tunnel-vision, and wasn’t really suited for top-6 duties. Your comparison makes no sense at all.You just said that calling Dach a perimeter player is “nonsense” then proceeded to say you know more than most fans. You clearly are implying something here. This is who is. He’s a slightly better Lars Eller
Long term future Kirby I would put at wing. He played his best hockey couple years back with Suzuki and Caufield. Canadiens going to be deep at center
To be fair, he looked good playing RW as well.Nah, his best stretch was when he went off that line and centered his own line.
He is completely rusty and playing on a line with 0 chemistry; drawing conclusions while the whole team looks like shit on individual players, especially Dach, is folly.
He did look better ar RW but that's mostly because of Suzuki I'd say.To be fair, he looked good playing RW as well.
That's fine. He still complimented that line well with his size, board play and passing.He did look better ar RW but that's mostly because of Suzuki I'd say.
I don’t think a professional hockey player should struggle at making 10 foot passes, period.. Guy looks slurry, slow and disinterested.Nah, his best stretch was when he went off that line and centered his own line.
He is completely rusty and playing on a line with 0 chemistry; drawing conclusions while the whole team looks like shit on individual players, especially Dach, is folly.
This. And Caufield’s 30% shooting.Sam Montembeault is currently sitting at .932 and we all know that's unsustainable.
I wouldn't count Kapanen out of the equation to be 2C later on in the season. I don't think Dach has an entire season to figure it out, but he still has a good chunk of time.He will be fine. He just needs time and keep staying healthy. Timing and confidence will be back. And it's not like we have better options at center for the 2nd line. Maybe make Newhook takes reps and faceoffs but other than that...
Yeah i guess it's not completely out of the question Kapanen is getting tryouts at 2C if Dach keeps struggling for a bunch of time but i don't think he has what it take to produce that kind of offense to be honest.I wouldn't count Kapanen out of the equation to be 2C later on in the season. I don't think Dach has an entire season to figure it out, but he still has a good chunk of time.
With Dach, this is just a gut feeling, but I don't think he will be happy on the wing. If he ends up not being our long-term solution at C, I think he should be traded. I think he will figure it out at C, though, but there is a good chance he doesn't or someone overtakes him (Kap/Hage).
I have never really been impressed with Dach's offensive game, really.Yeah i guess it's not completely out of the question Kapanen is getting tryouts at 2C if Dach keeps struggling for a bunch of time but i don't think he has what it take to produce that kind of offense to be honest.
Eller always had tunnel-vision, and wasn’t really suited for top-6 duties. Your comparison makes no sense at all.
I wouldn't count Kapanen out of the equation to be 2C later on in the season. I don't think Dach has an entire season to figure it out, but he still has a good chunk of time.
He is who he is… Which is not much right now. I feel we've been projecting the whole team’s youth as something more than it really is. I would not get attached to anyone at this point or pencil anyone in as a piece of the future. Potential means nothing on the ice unfortunately, and injuries have this guy trending down fast.…he's a major piece of the team's future.
He never developed into a top-6 player, in part due to his lack of offensive creativity, and his vision was very questionable. You can blame Therrien for mismanaging Eller, which is fair, but the point was that Eller’s vision was never the main selling points of his game, and that he cannot be compared to Dach.Not true, Eller had a decent assists to points ratio prior to the Habs' and after the Habs. His so-called tunnel vision on the Habs was in fact an adaptation to playing with guys who couldn't shoot the puck, like Rene Bourque.