Player Discussion Kirby Dach: Welcome to Montreal part 2

Habssince89

trolls to the IL
Sponsor
Apr 14, 2009
9,177
4,642
Vancouver, BC
I think Dach is going to develop nicely under MSL. I think MSL will focus on him using his body to protect the puck and positioning, and Dach won't be pressured into becoming a hard-nosed hitter, which he isn't. Dach is similar to Armia IMO, or at least draft-year Armia. Dach doesn't have to take people's heads off if he's scoring points and possessing the puck. Let's also remember that he's 21(?) so maybe by 24-25 he's going to have some more strength and physicality to his game. He's not KK in terms of balance thankfully lol
 

BenchBrawl

Registered User
Jul 26, 2010
31,053
13,975
Dach's reach is crazy. He really is very, very tall.

He's a good player but I will say, I would be shocked if he ever became a #1 center. Hope he proves me wrong big time.
 

Redux91

I do Three bullets.
Sep 5, 2006
47,007
43,405
Kirkland, Montreal
Dach's reach is crazy. He really is very, very tall.

He's a good player but I will say, I would be shocked if he ever became a #1 center. Hope he proves me wrong big time.
That's the BEST part about him lol
Chicago needed him to become #1C eventually
WE don't lol

He either claims 2C eventually, or maybe someone like Beck comes around and both he and Dach become hybrid 2/3C's depending on matchups and scenarios

Or they sign Monahan too lol etc, etc,

These are good "problems" to have

Our actual 1C has 5 pts in 4 games btw.
 

SlafySZN

Registered User
May 21, 2022
7,474
16,149
Dach's reach is crazy. He really is very, very tall.

He's a good player but I will say, I would be shocked if he ever became a #1 center. Hope he proves me wrong big time.

Maybe not a bonafide #1 but with his two-way play, and transition play, and when he’ll find a way to convert it in points, he could become a legit 1B
 

BenchBrawl

Registered User
Jul 26, 2010
31,053
13,975
That's the BEST part about him lol
Chicago needed him to become #1C eventually
WE don't lol

He either claims 2C eventually, or maybe someone like Beck comes around and both he and Dach become hybrid 2/3C's depending on matchups and scenarios

Or they sign Monahan too lol etc, etc,

These are good "problems" to have

Our actual 1C has 5 pts in 4 games btw.

We don't need him to become that because we'll draft a probable superstar #1 center in the 2023 draft. But otherwise, Suzuki alone at #1 center doesn't satisfy me on a top contender.

Maybe not a bonafide #1 but with his two-way play, and transition play, and when he’ll find a way to convert it in points, he could become a legit 1B

I wouldn't bet the house on that. Nothing I see in his game hints at this except his size. Hope I'm wrong.
 

Andy

Registered User
Jun 26, 2008
32,190
16,918
Montreal
Dach's reach is crazy. He really is very, very tall.

He's a good player but I will say, I would be shocked if he ever became a #1 center. Hope he proves me wrong big time.
I don't think there is #1 c potential either. Good possibility of #2. The skill is there. Strong possibility he ends up a tweener between #2 and #3.

Still very young though and a lot of room to grow
 
  • Like
Reactions: Redux91

Mrb1p

PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
Dec 10, 2011
91,425
58,524
Citizen of the world
Maybe not a bonafide #1 but with his two-way play, and transition play, and when he’ll find a way to convert it in points, he could become a legit 1B
He could become a top 10 C, not only a 1B.

He needs to make stride and show what his skill set can actually get him. Sometimes hes content with the Shane Wright way, he could be a lot more with coaching.
 

SlafySZN

Registered User
May 21, 2022
7,474
16,149
We don't need him to become that because we'll draft a probable superstar #1 center in the 2023 draft. But otherwise, Suzuki alone at #1 center doesn't satisfy me on a top contender.



I wouldn't bet the house on that. Nothing I see in his game hints at this except his size. Hope I'm wrong.

I mean i think he could, he is very young still, but like you said we don’t need him to become that either anyway. The habs drafting an elite #1 C next summer will be a huge thing for the organisation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Redux91

BenchBrawl

Registered User
Jul 26, 2010
31,053
13,975
He could become a top 10 C, not only a 1B.

He needs to make stride and show what his skill set can actually get him. Sometimes hes content with the Shane Wright way, he could be a lot more with coaching.

Top 10 C? The amount of things that would have to go right for this to happen are astronomical. Slafkovsky has a better chance to become the best winger in the game than Dach has to become a Top 10 C in the league.
 

Mrb1p

PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
Dec 10, 2011
91,425
58,524
Citizen of the world
Top 10 C? The amount of things that would have to go right for this to happen are astronomical. Slafkovsky has a better chance to become the best winger in the game than Dach has to become a Top 10 C in the league.
I disagree.

Dach has an unique combination of size, vision and stickhandling that very few players have in the league. Ive been following him for the past 4 years now, theres a few things keeping him from that ceiling.

1. His shot, with that said, weve seen players like Getzlaf, Backstrom, Thornton and Spezza dominate without a sniper like shot.
2. His willingness to be the guy. He moves the puck too fast. When he holds onto it, hes actually amazing.
3. His inside game. That is almost 100% on willingness. He defers to others and to the perimeter way too much.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sterling Archer

BenchBrawl

Registered User
Jul 26, 2010
31,053
13,975
I disagree.

Dach has an unique combination of size, vision and stickhandling that very few players have in the league. Ive been following him for the past 4 years now, theres a few things keeping him from that ceiling.

1. His shot, with that said, weve seen players like Getzlaf, Backstrom, Thornton and Spezza dominate without a sniper like shot.
2. His willingness to be the guy. He moves the puck too fast. When he holds onto it, hes actually amazing.
3. His inside game. That is almost 100% on willingness. He defers to others and to the perimeter way too much.

1. Getzlaf has a great shot, just doesn't use it too often. Getzlaf is also very physical. Backstrom, Thornton and Spezza were Top 5 playmakers of their era. I don't see the elite vision in Dach just yet. Maybe it's there, but I haven't seen it. Certainly not comparable to these guys, including Getzlaf.
2. Right. This looks like the biggest problem. But it's not an easy problem to fix .
3. Again the willingness. Same as #2.

I wish him the best obviously, I don't hate him, and I was OK with the trade. Still am. But I'm not excited just yet.
 

MarioLeMoose

Registered User
Jul 15, 2022
585
1,428
Faceoffs are the least important factor in his game. I’m just not a fan of his game at all. He’s playing well, it’s just whatever, I’m not a fan. Felt the same way with patio ready. Good stats and shit, but meh for me to watch.
He's playing well and he has good stats and shit, but you're not a fan?

The kid has been fantastic. Can't believe we turned Romanov into him, talk about wizardry
 
Last edited:

japhi

Registered User
Jul 7, 2014
3,778
3,131
Feel like I have to keep saying this, but the difference between a #2C and #3C is little to nothing on a good team. Teams roll their top 9, they play similar ES minutes,

If Dach can develop into 45-60 point defensively responsible, 17mins a night C it doesn't matter what # we assign him. As others have pointed out we have our #1 locked up long term and we need two quality players behind him, with a defensive specialist in the last slot.

Early indications, he is clearly a top 9 C. Hard to believe with his pedigree, and what we've seen over the first few games, that he doesn't have 50+ points in him. Probably not this year - he is still 21 - but kid has tons of time and room to grow into his role.
 

Kudo Shinichi

Registered User
Apr 20, 2012
21,200
28,127
Should it? We must assume that we had all informations on draft day?

Why does that matter? We know now that Nazar will miss a full development year due to injury. The Nazar cult will have nothing to talk about for a year, hence they will be quieter. It will also probably change the mind of some people on wanting Nazar since losing a full year is pretty bad development wise.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sterling Archer

GrandBison

Registered User
Jul 1, 2019
2,082
2,439
Why does that matter? We know now that Nazar will miss a full development year due to injury. The Nazar cult will have nothing to talk about for a year, hence they will be quieter. It will also probably change the mind of some people on wanting Nazar since losing a full year is pretty bad development wise.
Maybe Hughes will acquire him in 2024 with CGY pick 🤪
 

Habs13

Registered User
Dec 30, 2004
14,622
11,897
Montreal
I disagree.

Dach has an unique combination of size, vision and stickhandling that very few players have in the league. Ive been following him for the past 4 years now, theres a few things keeping him from that ceiling.

1. His shot, with that said, weve seen players like Getzlaf, Backstrom, Thornton and Spezza dominate without a sniper like shot.
2. His willingness to be the guy. He moves the puck too fast. When he holds onto it, hes actually amazing.
3. His inside game. That is almost 100% on willingness. He defers to others and to the perimeter way too much.

2 and 3 sound like confidence issues, maybe from not being what the Hawks wanted him to be. That can be fixed. The shot, well, not as much - but he is a good passer so he can be a playmaking center
 

Andy

Registered User
Jun 26, 2008
32,190
16,918
Montreal
Feel like I have to keep saying this, but the difference between a #2C and #3C is little to nothing on a good team. Teams roll their top 9, they play similar ES minutes,

If Dach can develop into 45-60 point defensively responsible, 17mins a night C it doesn't matter what # we assign him. As others have pointed out we have our #1 locked up long term and we need two quality players behind him, with a defensive specialist in the last slot.

Early indications, he is clearly a top 9 C. Hard to believe with his pedigree, and what we've seen over the first few games, that he doesn't have 50+ points in him. Probably not this year - he is still 21 - but kid has tons of time and room to grow into his role.
Fairest assessment I’ve read since the trade
 

nhlfan9191

Registered User
Aug 4, 2010
19,988
18,177
2 and 3 sound like confidence issues, maybe from not being what the Hawks wanted him to be. That can be fixed. The shot, well, not as much - but he is a good passer so he can be a playmaking center
The goal he scored last night may have been 4 on 3, but that’s the way he’s going to score the majority of his goals at even strength as well. He’s great at finding lanes big guys typically can’t for a tap in. He just needs to find a way to do it at the NHL level and we also need guys who can get him the puck.
 

bcv

My french sucks.
Sep 18, 2010
4,723
2,878
I disagree.

Dach has an unique combination of size, vision and stickhandling that very few players have in the league. Ive been following him for the past 4 years now, theres a few things keeping him from that ceiling.

1. His shot, with that said, weve seen players like Getzlaf, Backstrom, Thornton and Spezza dominate without a sniper like shot.
2. His willingness to be the guy. He moves the puck too fast. When he holds onto it, hes actually amazing.
3. His inside game. That is almost 100% on willingness. He defers to others and to the perimeter way too much.
How was point 2 and 3 when he was in juniors? Is this something new or something that was always kinda there.
 

Mrb1p

PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
Dec 10, 2011
91,425
58,524
Citizen of the world
How was point 2 and 3 when he was in juniors? Is this something new or something that was always kinda there.
Thats a good question actually.

Point 2, absolutely not. Its probably part confidence and part system/pro play. He was dynamic in the same way a guy like Leo Carlsson is. He was the man in Saskatoon.

Point 3, I had him outside my top 7 because or it for most of the year. In the playoffs though? He showed he could take abuse, he showed a willingness to move to the middle, he showed a willingness to squeeze the board offensively, etc. Maybe hes just soft, if thats what it is, his ceiling is RyJo, its not bad for a 2nd round pick value (Romanov).
 
  • Like
Reactions: bcv

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad