Player Discussion Kirby Dach: Welcome to Montreal part 2

dackelljuneaubulis02

Registered User
Oct 13, 2012
12,039
7,743
I disagree on Seider again, I think you're having a bit of recency bias. He looked good at the WJC D1 and the WC but he was seen as a reach at 6 as Bob had him 10 spots later. He was kinda like Reinbacher where not a lot of people knew about him and a lot questionned his offensive upside.

I mean sure he's low as of today, can't have everything, but on draft day one could argue I overranked him, which is a generally good thing.

Don't think you're wrong on Dorofeyev, he's looking like he will be a heck of a player and Vegas fans are thrilled.


They wanted to tank. They even kept Reichel down because he was doing too good for them.

They had a vision and it paid off. Would've paid off too if they got Carlsson and Fantilli and even Michkov. They were not wrong. I guess limiting Dach's ice-time could also have worked though.

There's something to be said about priming your assets though. Going into a rebuild in 2022 with a 2019 draftee is good, but in two years when players start arriving he would be 25, a lot can change in that time frame. There's also something to be said about Dach being the perfect complement to Bedard, lol. He brings the size and speed that Bedard just doesn't have and he also can play on his wing as an ace playmaker.
Oh I didn't know that about Dorothy. Didn't we pass on him in the 2nd? That would sting.

I was very high on Seider and I wasn't alone. He rose very fast leading up to the draft. I wanted him to fall to us but I was positive he wouldn't. That's why I'm saying low-ish because you probably had your guys fairly locked in by that point as did many scouts.

No recency bias at all. I think many are forgetting that many people started drooling over him just before the draft. That's why I was excited when people were saying he looked better than Seider in his draft year. The narrative now is Seider's insane development curve, which I'm not disagreeing with but there were plenty of people here who were very very high on him. He really wasn't that off the board. 6 was fairly high though even with his stock rising but really not by much. I was fairly certain he wasn't dropping out of the top 10
 

SlafySZN

Registered User
May 21, 2022
7,733
16,876
Kirby wake up, Dach is having a breakout season this year

D584D852-4CE9-4D0C-A50A-587058AEBDA8.gif
 

Scriptor

Registered User
Jan 1, 2014
7,943
4,923
Thats definitely not the answer because Monahan is 29 years old and has at most only a couple of good hockey years left.
It doesn't need to be a long term solution with Monahan -- Just long enough for Newhook and Slafkovsky to reach another level and for Newhook to play with confidence so that he can switch to Center.

Caufield-Dach-Suzuki
Newhook-Monahan-Slafkovsky?

Becomes...

Caufield - Dach - Suzuki
Slafkovsky - Newhook - Roy
RHP - Beck- Anderson/Heineman
 

Kudo Shinichi

Registered User
Apr 20, 2012
21,338
28,428
It doesn't need to be a long term solution with Monahan -- Just long enough for Newhook and Slafkovsky to reach another level and for Newhook to play with confidence so that he can switch to Center.

Caufield-Dach-Suzuki
Newhook-Monahan-Slafkovsky?

Becomes...

Caufield - Dach - Suzuki
Slafkovsky - Newhook - Roy
RHP - Beck- Anderson/Heineman

That plan doesn't make any sense.
You're placing Suzuki, who's the habs best forward and center at wing, and are hoping meanwhile that Newhook can become a top 6 center by developing him on the wing.

The center position is also the most important position at forward. So it doesn't make sense to worsen the center depth to improve the wing depth.
 

Scriptor

Registered User
Jan 1, 2014
7,943
4,923
That plan doesn't make any sense.
You're placing Suzuki, who's the habs best forward and center at wing, and are hoping meanwhile that Newhook can become a top 6 center by developing him on the wing.

The center position is also the most important position at forward. So it doesn't make sense to worsen the center depth to improve the wing depth.
Dach or Suzuki on RW, it's the same thing. That makes for a helluva 1st line. I honestly think Newhook is better at C. At the very least he can use all of his skill set at that position.

A 2nd line of Slafkovsky - Newhook - Roy would be pretty good.

Still, I'd prefer a C-line of Suzuki - Dach - Newhook - Beck in the future , or Dach - Suzuki - Newhook - Beck, if Dach continues to improve and takes the next step.

We still need high end, quality wingers - Two top-6 wingers, to be exact. Roy and Heineman can play with Newhook. Anderson can serve as trade bait, along with draft capital, to get a younger, top-6 forward in the 2025 offseason.
 

MadMslm

Registered User
Jun 16, 2018
2,111
2,530
Honestly, Dach is just good at every facet in every facet of the game that it’s disturbing.

Other than faceoffs and shooting, he has everything to be a dominant force.

Tonight, he seemed go fumble the puck a few times in the offensive zone which isn’t like him, but still ended up with two assists (and would have finished with three if the Caufield goal was good).

I’m eager to see what highs he will reach this season.
 

Colezuki

Registered User
Apr 27, 2009
9,809
6,699
Toronto
I saw him in the preseason comeback in Toronto and turned to my gf and said “I need a dach jersey”. Quietly morphing into my favorite player with caufield and Suzuki. Suzuki’s true breakout year would be Dachs next year so excited to see what will happen there as time goes by. He had a couple shifts where he started to take the game over and the kid line is just a puck possession monster, new hooks speed and slaf and Dachs size and reach just make it so difficult
 

Jaynki

Registered User
Feb 3, 2014
5,870
6,049
He is incredible. What a beast.

I will say it again but people that excuse this trade from the Blackhawks POV because they got Bedard, its f***ing lunatic.

They sold Dach for a f***ing 13OV pick. . . I just don't know what to say. Terrible asset management. Franchise killing trade.

They may never have the chance to acquire such a center during Bedard tenure. These type of C are rarely available as UFA and you have to be lucky to draft them. They are untouchable in trades.

Well who cares, he is ours now and he will be our 1C.

That 2022 draft will be iconic for our franchise.
 

Gustave

Registered User
Feb 15, 2007
8,700
6,298
Here
He is incredible. What a beast.

I will say it again but people that excuse this trade from the Blackhawks POV because they got Bedard, its f***ing lunatic.

They sold Dach for a f***ing 13OV pick. . . I just don't know what to say. Terrible asset management. Franchise killing trade.

They may never have the chance to acquire such a center during Bedard tenure. These type of C are rarely available as UFA and you have to be lucky to draft them. They are untouchable in trades.

Well who cares, he is ours now and he will be our 1C.

That 2022 draft will be iconic for our franchise.
The Hawks don't care anymore about anything other than Bedard, incredibly sad but it did work out for them in the end. I would look at it the same way too... I mean Bedard changes everything and i'm pissed they got him. UFA's will flock there... nauseating.

From our stand point.... we got something we lacked and we aren't giving it back :laugh: Hugo made out like bandits and like you, It's all I care about at this point. Man he's getting good!
 

KevSkillz4

Registered User
Apr 11, 2016
8,270
13,979
I will say that again... Dach have the highest potential in Habs team. Caufield, Suzuki and Slaf are and will be great, they are amazing aswell, but the combo of Dach is just incredible, big, skate, two-way, protection of puck, hands, passing.

He is literally Ryan Getzlaf 2.0.
 

MarioLeMoose

Registered User
Jul 15, 2022
585
1,428
What an absolute beast this kid is. Loving the dark tinted visor as well, he means business this year. 75pt season incoming.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: NyQuil

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad