The Challenge of predicting the Eastern Conference now is that none of the teams went over the top. The ones that did solid buys only filled gaps. Where that becomes a challenge is determining how those gaps adversely affected those teams In the first half and how filling those gaps changes the dynamics within those teams.
Sudbury added some defence and a centre to help fill some gaps they had. Ottawa added two centres and a D-Man. NB added a couple forwards and a D-Man. these are three teams in particular that had decent foundations but glaring holes that were hampering the teams from finding any sustainable success. Kingston and Oshawa tinkered a bit and got better but tinkering isn’t ideal when other teams jsut as good do major changes. Brantford did very well taking advantage of some high valued graduating players and then filling their absences with viable replacements. So, they are likley slightly less than they were.
So, on the surface, only looking at the impact of changes, you have to consider NB, Sudbury and Ottawa as the ones most positively impacted. For teams like Kingston and Oshawa to push ahead of those three, they have ot obtain internal improvement that wasn’t there earlier or, in Oshawa’s case, return a significant player(Ritchie) from injury.
So, it is incumbent on Oshawa, Brantford and Kingston to prove they are in the same category as the three that filled their gaps fully. It is on NB, Sudbury and Ottawa to prove they cannot win. It is sort of the same scenario where the bigger player needs to prove he can’t play while the smaller player needs to prove he can play.
Weekend #1 was fruitful for NB And Ottawa. Both beat good teams on the road. Sudbury was a mixed bag. Oshawa proved they can be right there. Kingston looks to be struggling. Brantford is somewhere in the middle of all that floating around. I think we need a couple more weeks before we get a stronger sense of what the real landscape Is or should be.