You sure about that?
You seem pretty sure here that pragmatism has led you to think the GM isn't even a GM, by however you define them.
It's not a slight on Adams, it's an observation. Post Eichel trade, He's treated the team like something he's there to watch over rather than something he is there to improve. The original post i was responding to stated that he couldn't imagine why people would be frustrated with Adams, I listed the reasons. By all accounts, it's been a conscience decision by him to do so. Maybe he will be proven right in the long term and it was what was best for the team. However, you can see how that approach would elicit frustration, especially when there are obvious, immediate teams that remain unaddressed, especially when there are no resource restraints such as cap space or lack of draft capital preventing the team from improving via outside additions.
Last edited: