GKJ
Global Moderator
- Feb 27, 2002
- 194,619
- 44,425
With bacon?
With bacon?
It's a Saturday though so I doubt it.This will probably break HF
Why do we want even half of Hayes contract? Crap contract for crap contract I hope.(Responding to multiple players' suggestion of Krug) In what way would taking Krug's contract back be beneficial for the Flyers? It is only $600,000 less and the Flyers would be stuck with $6.5 million for an additional year. Are the Blues sending a 1st+?
I hear Hayes, Laughton and KonecnyRumor is Sanheim, Laughton, Hayes, TDA involved. That’s insane
Hayes, Konecny and Laughton to STL, I hear
Which unnamed source will be correct? STAY TUNEDRumor is Sanheim, Laughton, Hayes, TDA involved. That’s insane
Players who could be.Rumor is Sanheim, Laughton, Hayes, TDA involved. That’s insane
I hear it in my head, forgot to mention.Which unnamed source will be correct? STAY TUNED
That’s what I’m thinking. That feels old schoolPlayers who could be.
That type of deal is a 90s deal to have all of them
I'd be stoked.That’s what I’m thinking. That feels old school
He’s not going to accept a trade to the Flyers. Doesn’t he have a complete no-trade?It better be Krug
I’d take Parayko on the isles or Leddy backSoooo what does St Louis do on the blueline if they're bringing in one (or two) of Philly's Dmen?
Capfriendly says that Faulk, Parayko, Leddy and Krug ALL have non-modified NTCs????
As a Sabres fan, I'd be awfully intrigued by Parayko.I’d take Parayko on the isles or Leddy back
Krug and/or Scandella would likely be moved.Soooo what does St Louis do on the blueline if they're bringing in one (or two) of Philly's Dmen?
Capfriendly says that Faulk, Parayko, Leddy and Krug ALL have non-modified NTCs????