DatDude44
Hmmmm?
- Feb 23, 2012
- 6,330
- 3,207
It better be KrugHayes to STL, but Philly would have to take Krug or Leddy as part of the package.
It better be KrugHayes to STL, but Philly would have to take Krug or Leddy as part of the package.
Need cap space for what? The difference between 30-50% is like 1.5m. That’s a negligible difference for the Flyers immediate goals.Interesting. I was looking at it as it’s better to more cap space going forward to have flexibility to take on a contract at future TDLs for assets.
probably Scandella. soon to be expiring contract with a similar caphit if Hayes is taken @ 50%.It better be Krug
Prepare to be disappointed.For the love of god Krug had better be going back the other way.
(Responding to multiple players' suggestion of Krug) In what way would taking Krug's contract back be beneficial for the Flyers? It is only $600,000 less and the Flyers would be stuck with $6.5 million for an additional year. Are the Blues sending a 1st+?For STL, Hayes would make sense at 50% or if we are swapping unsavory contracts (Krug for Hayes). I just don't see an actual outcome where the Blues can take the entire brunt of that 7mil contract with their current cap struggles.
With bacon?I’m hearing this will be a whopper of a trade
That was more of hopeful thinking. If we’re taking on Hayes, somebody with major salary has to be going back.I wonder if St. Louis will be getting Laughton or TK as well. Do they even have that type of cap space?
Prepare to be disappointed.
Started with Schenn, might as well keep it goingInteresting. Blues re-tool with Philly players?