People are still talking about it because certain people on here don’t live in reality. That’s it. We’re talking about it at this very moment because people claim to know what he really meant and it’s fantasy in order to defend the man and the organization.And apparently it worked, because people are still talking about it.
When the other team has the puck McDavid is not a detriment on defense. Tortorella thinks he is because he is an idiot.
I would like to take this moment to remind everyone that Torts often speaks in hyperbole...particularly when he was an ESPN analyst. Though I hate to get in the way of the agenda of certain people here.
You and a couple other posters post about Torts 20x/day each. It's an obsession. Don't try to blame your fixation on other posters. You'd be finding reasons to complain about Torts all day every day even if they weren't here.People are still talking about it because certain people on here don’t live in reality. That’s it. We’re talking about it at this very moment because people claim to know what he really meant and it’s fantasy in order to defend the man and the organization.
If those same people could just say “hey, that’s a stupid thing to say” we wouldn’t be talking about it.
You and a couple other posters post about Torts 20x/day each. It's an obsession. Don't try to blame your fixation on other posters. You'd be finding reasons to complain about Torts all day every day even if they weren't here.
My agenda is that I wish the Flyers were a good team and I oppose anything that keeps them from being good.
I'm still waiting for the list of "progressive" coaches.
Sullivan is a Torts protege.
Cassidy is a martinet.
Brind'Amour has a similar philosophy (former Selke)
Marty St. Louis.You say these things — like Jones and Tulsky are the same level of unknown — and assume we should treat them as fact. But we don’t have to treat this idea of Torts being similar to these coaches as fact.
Sullivan absolutely was a Torts protege, but he’s surpassed him by tenfold. No one said a coach can’t be a bit of an asshole (to a point — Sullivan has emotional intelligence), but as it always works, shtick goes as far as results. Sullivan runs circles around Tortorella as a tactician, he’s adored by his core players, he’s more accomplished in this era. He doesn’t have to do the Cult of Personality thing to make up for his many weaknesses in a game that’s passed him by.
Brindy is as beloved as any coach in the league. He’s absolutely a player’s coach. I wouldn’t call him an Xs and Os savant, but his systems and passed down organizational philosophies produce results every year.
And the key thing you choose to ignore: all these coaches have results. They win playoff rounds, they have dynamite metrics. What does Tortorella have besides his paper thin house of bluff and bluster?
I'm still waiting for the list of "progressive" coaches.
Sullivan is a Torts protege.
Cassidy is a martinet.
Brind'Amour has a similar philosophy (former Selke)
Maurice, Ruff, etc.
Basically you have Jon Cooper, Jared Bednar and Sheldon Keefe?
2013 article about the new breed of "players coaches":
Adam Oates, Dallas Eakins, Dan Bylsma, Kirk Muller, Peter DeBoer, Dave Tippett
NHL’s new breed of coaches grows with Oilers hiring Dallas Eakins
Dan Bylsma in Pittsburgh and Adam Oates in Washington among the bench bosses who believe communication with players is key to getting the most out of themwww.theglobeandmail.com
Seems the new fangled HCs are no more and maybe less successful than the Dinos.
No idea. Nothing came up when I searched for ANY HC.Speaking of waiting for lists of coaches, werent YOU asked yesterday in this very thread to list coaches who are (heavily) involved in drafts by @Beef Invictus?
Sorry won't insult Torts anymore. Great coach. Very confident in the direction of this franchise. Great team. Sorry again.I would like to take this moment to remind everyone that Torts often speaks in hyperbole...particularly when he was an ESPN analyst. Though I hate to get in the way of the agenda of certain people here.
Sorry won't insult Torts anymore. Great coach. Very confident in the direction of this franchise. Great team. Sorry again.
The off topic threads are nice. Enter elsewhere and like you said.... unless the Flyers actually do something meaningful it will stay the same posters doing their thing for whatever reasonThe more time I spend on this forum the more I realize how much of a waste of time it is.
Same stupid arguments by the same people.
I'm still waiting for the list of "progressive" coaches.
Sullivan is a Torts protege.
Cassidy is a martinet.
Brind'Amour has a similar philosophy (former Selke)
Maurice, Ruff, etc.
Basically you have Jon Cooper, Jared Bednar and Sheldon Keefe?
2013 article about the new breed of "players coaches":
Adam Oates, Dallas Eakins, Dan Bylsma, Kirk Muller, Peter DeBoer, Dave Tippett
NHL’s new breed of coaches grows with Oilers hiring Dallas Eakins
Dan Bylsma in Pittsburgh and Adam Oates in Washington among the bench bosses who believe communication with players is key to getting the most out of themwww.theglobeandmail.com
Seems the new fangled HCs are no more and maybe less successful than the Dinos.
I love how the brass just love to bring up other GM's opinions of the team, "Oh yeah the Flyers under Torts are really tough to play against, hard place to play."
What those quotes don't include is the context nor the 2 minutes of manic laughter after the words left the GM's mouth.
You say these things — like Jones and Tulsky are the same level of unknown — and assume we should treat them as fact. But we don’t have to treat this idea of Torts being similar to these coaches as fact. We don’t have to use your definition of progressive either.
Sullivan absolutely was a Torts protege, but he’s surpassed him by tenfold. No one said a coach can’t be a bit of an asshole (to a point — Sullivan has emotional intelligence), but as it always works, shtick goes as far as results. Sullivan runs circles around Tortorella as a tactician, he’s adored by his core players, he’s more accomplished in this era. He doesn’t have to do the Cult of Personality thing to make up for his many weaknesses in a game that’s passed him by. Sullivan is what Tort’s worshippers imagine Tortorella to be.
Brindy is as beloved as any coach in the league — guys would run through a wall for him because he’s a master at messaging. He’s absolutely a player’s coach with high emotional IQ. I wouldn’t call him an Xs and Os savant, but his systems and marinated organizational philosophies produce results every year. Because they dump the puck in a lot, with success, he’s not progressive in other ways? It sounds like you’re the one with the over-simplistic definition.
And the key thing you choose to ignore: all these coaches have results. They win playoff rounds, they have dynamite metrics, top teams seek them out or would. What does Tortorella have besides his paper thin house of bluff and bluster? No team in the league wanted Tortorella besides the Flyers. Surely, you of all people understand how a market works.
The more time I spend on this forum the more I realize how much of a waste of time it is.
Same stupid arguments by the same people.
We're in a thread about hiring Keith Jones as President of Hockey Operations...wtf kind of discussion do you want?yeah if you’re coming to this board for flyers discussion just go round the way and face a septa bus instead.
but over the years i’ve learned who’s a moron and who isn’t and i like the sixers and eagles threads and i am too old to invest time sussing out morons on an eagles or sixers board.
We're in a thread about hiring Keith Jones as President of Hockey Operations...wtf kind of discussion do you want?