I’m crying that trading for Panarin age 26 was a bad on-ice trade. The guy with the top 2 highest point totals in team history. Acquired for Saad and spare parts.
“Now, for my next trick watch as I spin Ristolainen as a
good on-ice trade…...”
Two years of Panarin were acquired, since he made it clear he had no interest in staying in Columbus.
They scored 247 goals the year before they acquired Panarin, 236 and 256 after they acquired him.
The offense collapsed after Panarin, Duchene, Duclair left, but primarily b/c Torts got conservative after Bob left, protecting two mediocre goalies in Korpisalo and Merzlikins.
Nor did acquiring Panarin turn the Rangers around, it would take two more years and the emergence of Shesterkins and a bunch of young players like Fox, Chytil, adding Trouba, etc.
Toronto
2016-17: 250 goals
2017-18: 270 goals
2018-19: 286 goals (add JT)
2019-20: 278 goals (237 in 70 games)
2020-21: 272 goals (186 in 56 games)
2021-22: 312 goals
2022-23: 278 goals
Adding a top scorer doesn't always make a big difference for a number of reasons:
1) cost to add player, trade, cap hit, weakens depth or makes it hard to retain other offensive players
2) chemistry, only one puck, lines are most effective with the right mix of players, a top score can push other players into less effective roles
3) minutes, you pay a scorer, you feel obligated to give him a lot of minutes, blocking the development of other players
Article is behind a pay wall, but yeah, I thought so.
Good job, Flyers
Apparently Fletchet had a "mostly successfull" run in Minnesota...are they serious?
About as good as Toronto, he made the playoffs six straight seasons and got to the 2nd rd twice.