Confirmed with Link: Keith Jones actually set to be named real life part-time President of Hockey Operations, Danny Briere full-time GM

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ghosts Beer

I saw Goody Fletcher with the Devil!
Feb 10, 2014
22,780
16,527
I see you're dodging the question. Why is that? Is it because you're not actually serious about this "series wins" evaluation?
What are you struggling to grasp here?

I’m asking why people would clamor to hire a GM who had no more success over the last five years than the GM they constantly mocked & ridiculed.

Why?
 
  • Like
Reactions: tucson83

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
130,492
171,215
Armored Train
What are you struggling to grasp here?

I’m asking why people would clamor to hire a GM who had no more success over the last five years than the GM they constantly mocked & ridiculed.

Why?

Because there's more to evaluating a GM than simply series wins. And you know this, or you'd have no problem selecting Holland over Dubas. But you can't do that because you realize Holland sucks.
 

Ghosts Beer

I saw Goody Fletcher with the Devil!
Feb 10, 2014
22,780
16,527
Because there's more to evaluating a GM than simply series wins. And you know this, or you'd have no problem selecting Holland over Dubas. But you can't do that because you realize Holland sucks.
I’m not creating a standardized GM rating formula.

I’m asking a philosophical question:

Why would one clamor to hire a GM who had no more success than the guy you just spent years mercilessly ridiculing? Why?

Why?

This Holland-Dubas nonsense is a silly non-sequitir effort to obfuscate my simple philosophical question. It’s utterly irrelevant.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tucson83

Chicken N Raffls

Here for the chaos and lolz
Nov 7, 2022
3,789
7,919
Douglassville
I’m not creating a standardized GM rating formula.

I’m asking a philosophical question:

Why would one clamor to hire a GM who had no more success than the guy you just spent years mercilessly ridiculing? Why?

Why?

This Holland-Dubas nonsense is a silly non-sequitir effort to obfuscate my simple philosophical question. It’s utterly irrelevant.

Are you sure? Seems like you did exactly that. This from Mr Objective who talks about not seeing things in black and white. Series wins = success. I don't even know squat about either of those guys, and I know this is nonsense.
 

Ghosts Beer

I saw Goody Fletcher with the Devil!
Feb 10, 2014
22,780
16,527
Are you sure? Seems like you did exactly that. This from Mr Objective who talks about not seeing things in black and white. Series wins = success. I don't even know squat about either of those guys, and I know this is nonsense.
So would you say Kyle Dubas was successful in Toronto?
 

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
130,492
171,215
Armored Train
I’m not creating a standardized GM rating formula.

I’m asking a philosophical question:

Why would one clamor to hire a GM who had no more success than the guy you just spent years mercilessly ridiculing? Why?

Why?

This Holland-Dubas nonsense is a silly non-sequitir effort to obfuscate my simple philosophical question. It’s utterly irrelevant.

Because there's more to measuring success than just series wins. And you know this.

He's had massively more success than Fletcher. Fletcher left a smoking crater. Dubas has not.
 

Ghosts Beer

I saw Goody Fletcher with the Devil!
Feb 10, 2014
22,780
16,527
Because there's more to measuring success than just series wins. And you know this.

He's had massively more success than Fletcher. Fletcher left a smoking crater. Dubas has not.
I’m not saying there isn’t. And every situation is different.

That said, Dubas’ situation was to win in the playoffs.

And you’d think, if he were so good, he could manage more playoff wins than a guy everyone said was so bad, right?
 
  • Like
Reactions: tucson83

Chicken N Raffls

Here for the chaos and lolz
Nov 7, 2022
3,789
7,919
Douglassville
So would you say Kyle Dubas was successful in Toronto?

Certainly more than Chuck. Unless we're going by PO series wins again? One thing about Toronto's embarrassing PO record recently is....they were in the Playoffs. Can't be a 2nd round pretender if you don't get to the 1st round

5DCLZUqb0ImZy.gif
 

bobbythebrain

Registered User
Jul 30, 2016
14,140
13,985
Every team in every league in every sport worth a damn uses data in bulk.
Except this isn't the be all end all like it's made to be on these forums. Aside from analytics, the "experts" on these boards ignore ALOT of other tangibles that contribute, even when the right decision

The amount of times "analytics" have been misrepresented here to make an argument is mind boggling, and comical, and a metric ton of contradictions too if you have a good memory
 

renberg

Registered User
Dec 31, 2003
7,250
7,519
Lewes Delaware
forums.hfboards.com
Early candidate for post of the year.
I'm not saying that the Flyers are in great shape but the Leafs are having serious issues that will have a negative impact on them going forward. Notice the qualifier in my post-not in much better. Their FO is in terrible shape with guys jumping the ship there. Coach is probably going to be fired. Their overall defense isn't much better than that of the Flyers. Goaltending goes to the Flyers. Cap issues go to them. Let's just see who they have to deal off to adjust their core and what thee coat and return are. If Matthews walks after the upcoming season, they're in the same boat as the Flyers will be at that time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ghosts Beer

Columbus Hockey Dad

Registered User
Oct 30, 2018
1,045
1,502
I'm not saying that the Flyers are in great shape but the Leafs are having serious issues that will have a negative impact on them going forward. Notice the qualifier in my post-not in much better. Their FO is in terrible shape with guys jumping the ship there. Coach is probably going to be fired. Their overall defense isn't much better than that of the Flyers. Goaltending goes to the Flyers. Cap issues go to them. Let's just see who they have to deal off to adjust their core and what thee coat and return are. If Matthews walks after the upcoming season, they're in the same boat as the Flyers will be at that time.
The Leafs really are in trouble. They can't trade Matthews because he's their franchise, but they very well could watch him walk next year. They can't trade Tavares because no one wants that contract, not even for two years. They won't trade Marner, but they WILL trade Nylander who is the one guy signed to a good deal. Their defense is suspect, their goaltending is as well, and they are stuck with Matt Murray's contract for another year. The things they need to do to stay relevant are the things they will never do. They could be in a lot of trouble.
 

Columbus Hockey Dad

Registered User
Oct 30, 2018
1,045
1,502
Arizona could be another interesting team to talk to. They need to both hit the cap floor and convince Clayton Keller that they're going to compete. Could they move their Ottawa first and/or some of their prospects for a Provorov/Konecny and the corpse of Ryan Ellis?
 

Curufinwe

Registered User
Feb 28, 2013
56,994
45,414
I'm not saying that the Flyers are in great shape but the Leafs are having serious issues that will have a negative impact on them going forward. Notice the qualifier in my post-not in much better. Their FO is in terrible shape with guys jumping the ship there. Coach is probably going to be fired. Their overall defense isn't much better than that of the Flyers. Goaltending goes to the Flyers. Cap issues go to them. Let's just see who they have to deal off to adjust their core and what thee coat and return are. If Matthews walks after the upcoming season, they're in the same boat as the Flyers will be at that time.
Since the bubble playoffs, the Flyers are ranked 26th and the Leafs are ranked 4th. They're not similar at all.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad