renberg
Registered User
The fans of analytics love Dubas because he is one of them. They’re willing to back him no matter what.
yup, i mean retread gms only work for so long eventually you have to go own route of developing your own gms so they can have fresh ideas of from other successful teams like vegas, dallas, carolina, florida that can make this team successful. that's why im liking the move, a different approach rather than spend to cap and going nowhere which alot of retread gms are doing.No GM is magic, but I also don't see the need to bring in a retread GM who hasn't been particularly successful.
Briere is a smart guy, a rink rat, competitive. Maybe he'll turn out to be a shrewd trader. Maybe he'll have a knack for NHL player evaluation, something the Flyers have been lacking.
Or maybe he'll be another average GM, like most are. I'd rather take the risk, with the possibility of reward, than hire an average retread.
The "fans of analytics" favor high probability moves and sound decision making. Wild concept.
I’m old enough to remember the time that people celebrated and knocked Zito for the Panthers getting swept in the second round last year.
Maybe let’s stop building narratives over small sample sizes.
I’m old enough to remember the time that people celebrated and knocked Zito for the Panthers getting swept in the second round last year.
Maybe let’s stop building narratives over small sample sizes.
@JojoTheWhale wrote that article better for me last year.
He said go to games with Thatcher Venmo to see the other teams.
What "analytics" did Zitto use in putting Marc Staal in the top 4?
For Dubas, series wins (or lack thereof) is an indicator of failure. You disagree?
Lmao at some of the people praising Dubas here.
What "analytics" did Zitto use in putting Marc Staal in the top 4?
Better yet, one of Dubas pats on the back was getting Luke Schenn for the playoffs. I would LOVE to se how many Dubas fanboys on here also were Schenn fans too .
I truly hope you recognize the massive levels of hypocrisy going on here.I don’t care if Dubas used analytics or not.
When you inherit a young core of Matthews, Marner, Nylander, & Rielly, plus substantial cap space, and after 5 years you have won a grand total of one playoff round, same as the lowly ridiculed Chuck Fletcher, then you failed.
I am not touting your GM brilliance & clamoring to put you in charge of the Flyers.
That's a non-sequitir.Only to a degree. I think more context is needed and focusing solely on series wins is a bad analysis.
You'd take Holland over Dubas right? If you don't, then you must agree
I don’t care if Dubas used analytics or not.
When you inherit a young core of Matthews, Marner, Nylander, & Rielly, plus substantial cap space, and after 5 years you have won a grand total of one playoff round, same as the lowly ridiculed Chuck Fletcher, then you failed.
I am not touting your GM brilliance & clamoring to put you in charge of the Flyers.
That's a non-sequitir.
In Dubas' situation, one playoff round win in five years is a failure.
I truly hope you recognize the massive levels of hypocrisy going on here.
Cow dung or chicken sh**?Holland or Dubas? I want to see if you're serious about this as an evaluation method or if you're just being a pure contrarian.
Cow dung or chicken sh**?