They should. Which feeds into the bass-ackwardness of the entire process. The GM should hire a coach who he believes can implement his vision. The organization should not hire a GM because he backs the vision the coach has.
I don't think it quite worked that way.
It's more Torts was the first to articulate the need for a long-term rebuild, but Briere came to the same conclusion.
The two then seemed to have developed a strategy together and then sold it to Hilferty (maybe before he replaced Scott) with Camillo as the possible intermediary.
I don't think it's rocket science. The team needs to get young and faster. They need more skill.
The ability to make skillful plays in dirty areas and under pressure will be valued more than making skilled plays in clean ice.
Nor is their vision very different from the four teams that made the finals, watching the playoffs, all four teams seem to focus on an aggressive forecheck, D-men aggressively stepping up on offense, a strong back check, the low/high cycle and success at winning board battles. There may be schematic differences, but all four teams are more "grinders" than figure skaters, they have good size, and go to the net.
If I were to make a list of former teammates Briere
might use as templates:
Phoenix: Teppo Numminen D, Daymond Langkow F,
Buffalo: Bryan Campbell D, Chris Drury C
Flyers: Kimmo D, Pronger D, Richards C (on ice), Giroux RW
Habs: Andrei Markov D, P.K. Subban D, Thomas Plekanec.
That would be a good question to ask him, what former teammates would he want to clone for the Flyer rebuild?